A GUIDE TO THE JOINT COMMISSION’S COMMUNICATION GOAL
A GUIDE TO THE JOINT COMMISSION’S COMMUNICATION GOAL
STATED MISSION
MISSION:
To continuously improve healthcare for the public, in collaboration with other stakeholders, by evaluating healthcare organizations and inspiring them to excel in providing safe and effective care of the highest quality and value.
http://www.jointcommission.org/the_joint_commission_mission_statement/
IMPROVING HOSPITAL COMMUNICATION
NATIONAL PATIENT SAFETY GOALS (NPSG)
Improve the safety and effectiveness of communication among caregivers
NPSG.02.03.01Report critical results of tests and diagnostic procedures on a timely basis
http://www.jointcommission.org/standards_information/npsgs.aspx
NPSG.06.01.01Clinical alarm safety for hospitals and critical access hospitals
THE NEED FOR BETTER COMMUNICATION
http://www.jointcommission.org/Sentinel_Event_Statistics/
5
U.S. hospitals waste more than $12B/year from communication inefficiencies*
A 500-bed hospital is estimated to lose more than $4M/year from communication inefficiencies*
Annual malpractice payouts for communication breakdowns quadrupled 1991-2012 to $91M**
THE COST OF POOR COMMUNICATION
*Agarwal, R., Sands, D.Z., Schneider, J.D. (2010). Quantifying the economic impact of communication inefficiencies in U.S. hospitals. Journal of Healthcare Management, 55(4), 265-82
**Journal of the American College of Radiology, Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages 776 -779, November 2011
TECHNOLOGY THAT CAN HELP IMPROVE MOBILE WORKFLOWS
The right INFORMATION: Clinical alerts and test results
The right PERSON: Reaching hospital staff and on-call providers
The right DEVICE: Smartphone, tablet, pager, Wi-Fi phone
The right TIME: Speed and effectiveness
1
2
3
4
THE RIGHT INFORMATION: CLINICAL ALERTS AND TEST RESULTS
CLINICAL ALERTING: MANY ALARMS PER PATIENT PER DAY
alarm conditions per day - per bed350
• Bad data or sensor• Not set to actionable levels• Duplicate alarms• Thresholds too tight•Many false positives• Closed doors make it difficult to hear alarms
85-99% of alarms are non-actionable
http://www.aami.org/htsi/SI_Series/Johns_Hopkins_White_Paper.pdf
HELPING STAFF RESPOND QUICKLY
Sorting, prioritizing, and routing input sources like
patient monitoring and nurse call to staff’s mobile devices
ALARM MANAGEMENT FOR PATIENT SAFETY & SATISFACTION
•Faster staff response to dangerous changes in patients’ vital status•Reduce overhead paging to promote quiet healing•Handle patient requests more quickly and easily•Reduce accidents and falls•Higher satisfaction
TRADITIONAL WORKFLOW
Nurse tries to fix unsuccessfully and calls
telemetry tech to fix
Nurse hears alarm, runs to patient room, and sees it
is a lead malfunctionPatient monitor alarm
goes off
Nurse puts patient on portable telemetry monitor to continue
patient monitoring until hardwired monitor is fixed
PATIENT ALARM - LEAD MALFUNCTION
CNA or tele tech troubleshoots lead and learns they need to text
biotech engineer
CNA or tele tech receives high-priority alarm on
smartphone and goes to patient room
Patient monitor alarm goes off due to lead
malfunction
CNA or tele tech puts patient on portable
patient monitor until biotech fixes hardwired
patient monitor
WITH
PATIENT ALARM - LEAD MALFUNCTION
High Priority:Lead off alertRoom 203
Nurse and team arrive in patient room quickly and
begin defibrillation
Nurse receives urgent priority
V-fib alarm on smartphone and calls for staff
assistance on the way to the patient room
Patient monitor V-fib alarm
goes off
WITH
PATIENT ALARM - V-FIB ALARM
Urgent:V-Fib alertRoom 203
IMPROVING ALARM MANAGEMENT
• Reduced alarm fatigue improves patient safety
• Better patient response improves patient care
• Improved staff efficiency and satisfaction
• Works with the systems and devices you already use
CRITICAL TEST RESULTS MANAGEMENT: MANY TESTS, MANY RESULTS
http://www.asrt.org/main/standards-regulations/federal-legislative-affairs/state-and-federal-licensure-issues
http://wwwn.cdc.gov/futurelabmedicine/pdfs/2007%20status%20report%20laboratory_medicine_-_a_national_status_report_from_the_lewin_group_updated_2008-9.pdf
RADIOLOGY TESTS
LAB TESTS
Approx. 400 million radiology exams are done in the U.S. per year
Approx. 6.8 billion lab testsare done in the U.S. per year
RESULTS ONLY MATTER IF THEY’RE RECEIVED
Of test results specifically cited as a factor in a malpractice case:
Journal of the American College of Radiology Volume 8, Issue 11 - November 2011 Pages 776-779
“Of malpractices cases ... 75% are communication related.”
MOST COMMON PROBLEMPatient didn’t receive test resultsSECOND-MOST COMMON PROBLEMClinician didn’t receive test results
TRADITIONAL WORKFLOW
After some phone tag, Radiologist speaks with the ordering physician
about the patient
Results are critical
Radiology tech attempts to contact ordering
physician
Physician recommends patient has chest x-ray
Treatment begins
COMMUNICATION BREAKDOWN
CRITICAL TEST RESULTS
WITH
Results are sent immediately to the
physician’s device and includes audit trail
Results are critical
The patient’s physician must be notified
Physician recommends patient has chest x-ray
Attending physician takes immediate action
Results are entered into Spok
CRITICAL TEST RESULTS
CLOSED LOOP FOR CRITICAL TEST RESULTS
• Increase patient safety and satisfaction
• Meet regulatory requirements• Speed patient discharge• Reduce liability• Improve physician productivity
THE RIGHT PERSON: REACHING HOSPITAL STAFF AND ON-CALL PROVIDERS
THE RIGHT DEVICE: SMARTPHONE, TABLET, PAGER, WI-FI PHONE
SMARTPHONES IN HEALTHCARE
IT teams want to meet physician requests while
ensuring security and reliability.
Clinicians demand consolidated messaging on their smartphones.
SMARTPHONES IN HEALTHCARE
• Communication ranks in the top three causes contributing to sentinel events (as reported to the Joint Commission)
• The Joint Commission says texting is unacceptable for treatment orders– Cannot verify identity of sender– Need to keep the original message as validation
for medical record entry
WHAT’S MISSING WITH STANDARD TEXTING
• Staff directory integration• Prioritization of critical messages• Separation of patient and personal• Audit trails and escalations• Security for electronic protected
health information (ePHI)
SPOK MOBILE™
Secure, encrypted receipt of messages on smartphones
and tablets
Message to anyone in your organization’s directory with
traceable communications
Improve efficiency and workflows via better information
sharing at critical points
SECURITY AND ENCRYTION: PROTECTING SENSITIVE INFORMATION
• Provide security for ePHI• Meet HIPAA and HITECH Act guidelines
with a business associate agreement (BAA)
• Encryption via SSL connection – application, as well as data during transit and storage— Text, images, and video files
• Remote device wipe and automated message removal
• Application screen lock and access code
WHAT DIFFERENTIATES SPOK MOBILE?
Technical differentiators• Option for premise or hosted in cloud • Device diversity– Smartphones, tablets, desktop / laptop
• Escalations for unanswered messages
• Programmable templates• Receive alarms and alerts from
nurse call, patient monitors, Lab, Radiology and EMR systems
THE RIGHT TIME: SPEED AND EFFECTIVENESS
• Advises average 90-minute “door-to-balloon” time– American Hospital Association– American College of Cardiology
• All hospitals must track this metric• ‘Code STEMI’ at Spok customer
IU Health Goshen Hospital– 129-minute average– Time wasted with extra calls– Uncertainty about who should do
what
AVERAGE DOOR-TO-BALLOON TIME: A KEY METRIC
BEFORE SPOK
Manual Paging
Manual Phone Tree
Wasted Time
Unconfirmed Responses
BEFORE Spok® e.NOTIFY = 129 MINUTESTIME TO COMPLETE THE PROCESS:
START
RESPONSE TEAM• Cath lab staff • House supervisor• ICU shift
coordinator/nurses
• Attending cardiologist• Cardiovascular
coordinator• ER director• Cardiovascular director
• ER shift coordinator• X-ray/imaging
technicians• Lab technicians
Heart Attack Balloon Successful
Over communicate to ensure proper response
Inefficient phone trees among 30
people
THE CODE STEMI ALERT: WITH SPOK
Heart Attack Balloon SuccessfulStaff Respond w/Availability
Use Spok e.Notify to Deploy Code
Spok e.Notify Manages Response & Escalation
RESPONSE TEAM• Cath lab staff • House supervisor• ICU shift
coordinator/nurses• Attending cardiologist• Cardiovascular
coordinator
• ER director• Cardiovascular
director• ER shift coordinator• X-ray/imaging
technicians• Lab technicians
Spok e.Notify• Logic for on-call calendar• Auto escalations based on
responses or non responses from staff
• Eliminates manual calling trees and messy escalations
BEFORE Spok e.NOTIFY = 129 MINUTESTIME TO COMPLETE THE PROCESS:
START
WITH Spok e.NOTIFY: 68 MINUTES
THE RESULTS
• Reduced average door-to-balloon time from 129 to 68 minutes• Improved response time and patient care• ER operator or house supervisor sends code STEMI notification
to 30 staff members• Staff members respond with status• Escalations and follow-ups as necessary• Process review after each event to improve wherever possible
IN REVIEW
Better workflows improve patient care and satisfaction
Right information, right person, right device, right time
Technology can significantly improve communication efficiency
Efficient communications increase patient safety and satisfaction, improve provider satisfaction, and support the delivery of excellent care
LET’S GET IN TOUCH!
Learn more:
CASE STUDIES VIDEOS
We’d love to hear from you!