Flickr Organizr Andrea Wiggins, Timothy Mills, Matt Rubinstein, Min Hu, David Lee
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Flickr Organizr
Andrea Wiggins, Timothy Mills, Matt Rubinstein, Min Hu, David
Lee
Organizr Overview
Personas and Scenarios
LauraArtist, 34 years old
New User
SaraPhysics Ph.D. student, 26 years old
Intermediate User
JohnCarpenter, 46 years old
Expert User
Summary of Findings
• Overall Flickr usability is very good
• Flickr is on an iterative release cycle(it’s constantly being changed… for the better)
• Some issues identified– Visibility– Labeling– Consistency
Usability testing: Overall Findings
Post Questionnaire ResponsesEase of Task Performance
Hardest Aspect of Organizr to Use
Aspect of Organizr they “Don’t Like”
Participant 1 Not too hard Groups Other – small size of text, basic tasks require practice
Participant 2 Very easy “except last task”
Sets Batch Organizr – difficulty selecting subsets of current selection
Participant 3 Not too hard Other – “missing out on little options”
Batch Organizr – “needs prompt to save changes because save button isn’t obvious”
Participant 4 Very easy Other – changing representative photo for sets
Batch Organizr
Evaluation Methods
• User testing– 4 subjects, 5 tasks
• Survey– 107 respondents
• Heuristic Evaluation– 10 heuristics with 5 reviewers
• Comparative Analysis– 9 physical and digital competing systems
• Vocabulary / Visual analysis
Visibility
• Findings: Clear batch, Findr filter feature, save button, date selector are examples of many functions are underutilized because they are not clearly visible
• Evidence: User testing, heuristic evaluation
• Recommendations: Trying other layouts that place functions in better locations. Need more pop-outpop-out
Labeling
• Findings: Some of the labeling is inconsistent. – “Add to set” sometimes creates a new set– Organizr vs Organizer vs Organize
• Evidence: Survey responses, Interviews, Heuristic Evaluation, User Testing, and Vocabulary Analysis
• Recommendations: Card sorting to determine optimal vocabulary
Consistency
• Findings: Good usability principles make for poor usability… sometimes. Its easy to select multiple things into the finder, but when you want to drag them out, it’s one at a time. Same thing is true when you’re working with groups.
• Evidence: User Testing, GTN, and Heuristics• Recommendations: Interaction consistency vs
labeling consistency.
Questions?
Related Documents
