Page 1
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐1
October 2014ICF 00323.08
3.3 Air Quality Thissectiondescribestheregulatoryandenvironmentalsettingforairquality.Italsodescribesimpactsonairqualitythatwouldresultfromimplementationoftheprogramandthetwoindividualprojectsanddescribesmitigationforsignificantimpactswherefeasibleandappropriate.Mitigationmeasuresareprescribedwherefeasibleandappropriate.
GreenhousegasemissionsareconsideredseparatelyfromtheairqualityanalysisinthisPEIRinChapter3.7.
3.3.1 Existing Conditions
TheprogramareaiswithintheSanFranciscoBayAreaAirBasin(SFBAAB),whichencompassesanine‐countyregionconsistingofallofAlameda,ContraCosta,SantaClara,SanFrancisco,SanMateo,Marin,andNapaCountiesandthesouthernportionsofSolanoandSonomaCounties.BecausetruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSanJoaquinValleyAirBasin(SJVAB)totheprogramarea,thestudyareaalsoincludestheSJVAB.
Regulatory Setting
TheairqualitymanagementagenciesofdirectimportanceinAlamedaCountyareEPA,theCaliforniaAirResourcesBoard(ARB),andtheBayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict(BAAQMD).EPAhasestablishedfederalairqualitystandardsforwhichARBandBAAQMDhaveprimaryimplementationresponsibility.ARBandBAAQMDarealsoresponsibleforensuringthatstateairqualitystandardsaremet.TheSanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict(SJVAPCD)hasjurisdictionovertheSJVAB.
Federal
Clean Air Act and National Ambient Air Quality Standards
ThefederalCleanAirAct(CAA),promulgatedin1963andamendedseveraltimesthereafter,includingthe1990CleanAirActamendments(CAAA),establishestheframeworkformodernairpollutioncontrol.TheActdirectsEPAtoestablishNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS)forthesixcriteriapollutants(discussedinSection3.3.2,EnvironmentalSetting).TheNAAQSaredividedintoprimaryandsecondarystandards;theformeraresettoprotecthumanhealthwithinanadequatemarginofsafety,andthelattertoprotectenvironmentalvalues,suchasplantandanimallife.Table3.3‐1summarizestheNAAQSandtheCaliforniaAmbientAirQualityStandards(CAAQS).
TheCAArequiresstatestosubmitastateimplementationplan(SIP)forareasinnonattainmentforfederalstandards.TheSIP,whichisreviewedandapprovedbyEPA,mustdemonstratehowthefederalstandardswouldbeachieved.Failingtosubmitaplanorsecureapprovalcanleadtodenialoffederalfundingandpermits.IncaseswheretheSIPfailstodemonstrateachievementofthestandards,EPAisdirectedtoprepareafederalimplementationplan.
Page 2
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐2
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.3‐1. National and State Ambient Air Quality Standards
CriteriaPollutant AverageTimeCaliforniaStandards
NationalStandardsa
Primary Secondary
Ozone 1‐hour 0.09ppm Noneb Noneb
8–hour 0.070ppm 0.075ppm 0.075ppm
Particulatematter(PM10) 24‐hour 50g/m3 150g/m3 150g/m3
Annualmean 20g/m3 None None
Fineparticulatematter(PM2.5) 24‐hour None 35g/m3 35g/m3
Annualmean 12g/m3 12.0g/m3 15g/m3
Carbonmonoxide 8‐hour 9.0ppm 9ppm None
1‐hour 20ppm 35ppm None
Nitrogendioxide Annualmean 0.030ppm 0.053ppm 0.053ppm
1‐hour 0.18ppm 0.100ppm None
Sulfurdioxidec Annualmean None 0.030ppm None
24‐hour 0.04ppm 0.14ppm None
3‐hour None None 0.5ppm
1‐hour 0.25ppm 0.075ppm None
Lead 30‐dayAverage 1.5g/m3 None None
Calendarquarter None 1.5g/m3 1.5g/m3
3‐monthaverage None 0.15g/m3 0.15g/m3
Sulfates 24‐hour 25g/m3 None None
Visibility‐reducingparticles 8‐hour –d None None
Hydrogensulfide 1‐hour 0.03ppm None None
Vinylchloride 24‐hour 0.01ppm None None
Source:CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013a.ppm = partspermillion.g/m3 = microgramspercubicmeter.a Nationalstandardsaredividedintoprimaryandsecondarystandards.Primarystandardsareintendedtoprotectpublichealth,whereassecondarystandardsareintendedtoprotectpublicwelfareandtheenvironment.
b Thefederal1‐hourstandardof12partsperhundredmillionwasineffectfrom1979throughJune15,2005.Therevokedstandardisreferencedbecauseitwasemployedforsuchalongperiodandabenchmarkforstateimplementationplans.
c Theannualand24‐hourNAAQSforSO2applyonlyforoneyearafterdesignationofthenew1‐hourstandardtothoseareasthatwerepreviouslynonattainmentareasforthe24‐hourandannualNAAQS.
d TheCAAQSforvisibility‐reducingparticlesisdefinedbyanextinctioncoefficientof0.23perkilometer(visibilityof10milesormoreduetoparticleswhenrelativehumidityislessthan70%).
Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule
Toreduceemissionsfromoffroaddieselequipment,EPAestablishedaseriesofincreasinglystrictemissionstandardsfornewengines.Locomotivesandmarinevesselsareexemptfromthisrule.Manufacturersofoffroaddieselenginesarerequiredtoproduceenginesmeetingcertainemission
Page 3
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐3
October 2014ICF 00323.08
standardsbasedonthemodelyeartheenginewasmanufacturedbasedonthefollowingcomplianceschedule.
Tier1standardswerephasedinfrom1996to2000(yearofmanufacture),dependingontheenginehorsepowercategory.
Tier2standardswerephasedinfrom2001to2006.
Tier3standardswerephasedinfrom2006to2008.
Tier4standards,whichrequireadd‐onemissions‐controlequipmenttoattainthem,arecurrentlybeingphasedin,from2008to2015.
State
California Clean Air Act and California Ambient Air Quality Standards
In1988,thestatelegislatureadoptedtheCaliforniaCleanAirAct(CCAA),whichestablishedastatewideairpollutioncontrolprogram.UnlikethefederalCAA,theCCAAdoesnotsetpreciseattainmentdeadlines.Instead,theCCAArequiresallairdistrictsinthestatetoendeavortomeettheCAAQSbytheearliestpracticaldate.Eachairdistrict’scleanairplanisspecificallydesignedtoattainthestandardsandmustbedesignedtoachieveanannual5%reductionindistrict‐wideemissionsofeachnonattainmentpollutantoritsprecursors.Whenanairdistrictisunabletoachievea5%annualreductionindistrict‐wideemissionsofeachnonattainmentpollutantoritsprecursors,theadoptionof“allfeasiblemeasures”onanexpeditiousscheduleisacceptableasanalternativestrategy(HealthandSafetyCodeSection40914(b)(2)).CAAQSaregenerallymorestringentthantheNAAQSandincorporateadditionalstandardsforSO4,H2S,C2H3Cl,andvisibility‐reducingparticles.TheCAAQSandNAAQSarelistedtogetherinTable3.3‐1.
ARBandlocalairdistrictsbearresponsibilityforachievingtheCAAQSs,whicharetobeachievedthroughdistrict‐levelairqualitymanagementplansthatwouldbeincorporatedintotheSIP.InCalifornia,EPAhasdelegatedauthoritytoprepareSIPstoARB,which,inturn,hasdelegatedthatauthoritytoindividualairdistricts.ARBtraditionallyhasestablishedstateairqualitystandards,maintainingoversightauthorityinairqualityplanning,developingprogramsforreducingemissionsfrommotorvehicles,developingairemissioninventories,collectingairqualityandmeteorologicaldata,andapprovingSIPs.
TheCCAAsubstantiallyaddstotheauthorityandresponsibilitiesofairdistricts.TheCCAAdesignatesairdistrictsasleadairqualityplanningagencies,requiresairdistrictstoprepareairqualityplans,andgrantsairdistrictsauthoritytoimplementtransportationcontrolmeasures.TheCCAAalsoemphasizesthecontrolof“indirectandarea‐widesources”ofairpollutantemissions.TheCCAAgiveslocalairpollutioncontroldistrictsexplicitauthoritytoregulateindirectsourcesofairpollutionandtoestablishtrafficcontrolmeasures(TCMs).
Statewide Truck and Bus Regulation
Originallyadoptedin2005,theonroadtruckandbusregulationrequiresheavytruckstoberetrofittedwithparticulatematter(PM)filters.Theregulationappliestoprivatelyandfederallyowneddieselfueledtruckswithagrossvehicleweightrating(GWR)greaterthan14,000pounds.Compliancewiththeregulationcanbereachedthroughoneoftwopaths:(1)vehicleretrofitsaccordingtoengineyear,or(2)phase‐inschedule.CompliancepathsensurethatbyJanuary2023,nearlyalltrucksandbuseswillhave2010modelyearenginesornewer.
Page 4
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐4
October 2014ICF 00323.08
State Tailpipe Emission Standards
Toreduceemissionsfromoffroaddieselequipment,onroaddieseltrucks,andharborcraft,ARBestablishedaseriesofincreasinglystrictemissionstandardsfornewengines.Newconstructionequipmentusedfortheprogram,includingheavydutytrucksandoffroadconstructionequipment,willberequiredtocomplywiththestandards.
Toxic Air Containment Regulation
Californiaregulatestoxicaircontainments(TACs)primarilythroughtheTannerAirToxicsAct(AssemblyBill[AB]1807)andtheAirToxicsHotSpotsInformationandAssessmentActof1987(AB2588).Intheearly1980s,ARBestablishedastatewidecomprehensiveairtoxicsprogramtoreduceexposuretoairtoxics.TheToxicAirContaminantIdentificationandControlAct(AB1807)createdCalifornia’sprogramtoreduceexposuretoairtoxics.TheAirToxics“HotSpots”InformationandAssessmentAct(AB2588)supplementstheAB1807programbyrequiringastatewideairtoxicsinventory,notificationofpeopleexposedtoasignificanthealthrisk,andfacilityplanstoreducetheserisks.
InAugust1998,ARBidentifieddieselparticulatematter(DPM)emissionsfromdiesel‐fueledenginesasaTAC.InSeptember2000,ARBapprovedacomprehensivedieselriskreductionplantoreduceemissionsfrombothnewandexistingdiesel‐fueledenginesandvehicles(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2000).ThegoaloftheplanistoreducedieselPM10(respirableparticulatematter)emissionsandtheassociatedhealthriskby75%in2010andby85%by2020.Theplanidentifies14measuresthattargetnewandexistingonroadvehicles(e.g.,heavy‐dutytrucksandbuses),offroadequipment(e.g.,graders,tractors,forklifts,sweepers,andboats),portableequipment(e.g.,pumps),andstationaryengines(e.g.,stand‐bypowergenerators).ARBwillimplementtheplanoverthenextseveralyears.BecausetheARBmeasuresareenactedpriortoconstruction,theprogramwouldberequiredtocomplywithapplicabledieselcontrolmeasures.
TheTannerActsetsforthaformalprocedureforARBtodesignatesubstancesasTACs.Theprocedureentailsresearch,publicparticipation,andscientificpeerreviewbeforeARBdesignatesasubstanceasaTAC.Todate,ARBhasidentified21TACsandhasalsoadoptedEPA’slistofhazardousairpollutants(HAPs)asTACs.InAugust1998,DPMwasaddedtotheARBlistofTACs(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard1998).
TheHotSpotsActrequiresthatexistingfacilitiesthatemittoxicsubstancesabovespecifiedlevelscompletethefollowingsteps.
Prepareatoxicemissioninventory.
Prepareariskassessmentifemissionsaresignificant(i.e.,10tonsperyearorifthetoxicsubstanceisonDistrict’sHealthRiskAssessment[HRA]list).
Notifythepublicofsignificantrisklevels.
Prepareandimplementriskreductionmeasures.
ARBhasadoptedseveralregulationsthatwillreducedieselemissionsfromin‐usevehiclesandenginesthroughoutCalifornia.Forexample,ARBadoptedanidlingregulationforonroaddiesel‐fueledcommercialvehiclesinJuly2004andupdateditinOctober2005.TheregulationappliestopublicandprivatelyownedtruckswithaGWRgreaterthan10,000pounds.Vehiclessubjecttotheregulationareprohibitedfromidlingformorethan5minutesinanyonelocation.ARBalsoadopted
Page 5
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐5
October 2014ICF 00323.08
aregulationfordiesel‐poweredconstructionandminingvehiclesoperating.Fleetownersaresubjecttoretrofitoracceleratedreplacement/repowerrequirementsforwhichARBmustobtainauthorizationfromEPApriortoenforcement.Theregulationalsoimposesa5‐minuteidlinglimitationonowners,operators,andrentersorlesseesofoffroaddieselvehicles.Insomecases,theparticulatematterreductionstrategiesalsoreducesmog‐formingemissionssuchasNOX.Asanongoingprocess,ARBreviewsaircontaminantsandidentifiesthosethatareclassifiedasTACs.ARBalsocontinuestoestablishnewprogramsandregulationsforthecontrolofTACs,includingDPMs,asappropriate.
Local
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
BAAQMDhaslocalairqualityjurisdictionoverprojectsinAlamedaCounty.BAAQMD’sresponsibilitiesincludeoverseeingstationary‐sourceemissions,approvingpermits,maintainingemissionsinventories,maintainingairqualitystations,overseeingagriculturalburningpermits,andreviewingairquality–relatedsectionsofenvironmentaldocumentsrequiredbyCEQA.BAAQMDisalsoresponsibleforestablishingandenforcinglocalairqualityrulesandregulationsthataddresstherequirementsoffederalandstateairqualitylawsandensuringthattheNAAQSandCAAQSaremet.
TheBAAQMDrulesoutlinedbelowmayapplytotheprogram.AdditionalBAAQMDrulesmayapplyasproject‐specificcomponentsareidentified.
Regulation2,Rule2(NewSourceReview).ThisregulationcontainsrequirementsforBestAvailableControlTechnologyandemissionoffsets.
Regulation2,Rule5(NewSourceReviewofToxicAirContaminants).ThisregulationoutlinesguidanceforevaluatingTACemissionsandtheirpotentialhealthrisks.
Regulation6,Rule1(ParticulateMatter).ThisregulationrestrictsemissionsofPMdarkerthanNo.1ontheRinglemannCharttolessthan3minutesinany1hour.
Regulation7(OdorousSubstances).Thisregulationestablishesgeneralodorlimitationsonodoroussubstancesandspecificemissionlimitationsoncertainodorouscompounds.
Regulation9,Rule8(StationaryInternalCombustionEngines).ThisregulationlimitsemissionsofNOXandCOfromstationaryinternalcombustionenginesofmorethan50horsepower.
TheBayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrictCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityActAirQualityGuidelines(BAAQMDGuidelines)provideproceduresforassessingairqualityimpactsandpreparingtheairqualitysectionsofenvironmentaldocumentsunderCEQA.Theguidelinesidentifymethodologiesforpredictingprojectemissionsandimpactsandpresentmeasuresthatcanbeusedtoavoidorreduceairqualityimpacts.AlsooutlinedintheBAAQMDGuidelinesareadvisoryemissionsthresholdsthatthedistricthasadoptedtohelpCEQAleadagenciesdeterminewhetherconstructionandoperationalactivitiesassociatedwithprojectswouldhavesignificantadverseenvironmentalimpacts(BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict2011).
InAugust2013,theFirstDistrictCourtofAppealsreversedalowersuperiorcourtrulingthattheBAAQMDneededtocomplywithCEQApriortoadoptingits2010AirQualityGuidelinesandsignificancethresholds,therebyissuingawritofmandateorderingBAAQMDtosetasidethe
Page 6
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐6
October 2014ICF 00323.08
thresholdsandceasetheirdisseminationuntilBAAQMDcompliedwithCEQA.However,theAppellatecourtruledthatadoptionoftheguidelinesandthresholdsisnotconsideredaprojectsubjecttoCEQAreview,andadoptionofthesignificancethresholdswasnotarbitraryandcapricious.AsofNovember2013,theBAAQMDhasyettoformallyre‐recommenditsAirQualityGuidelinesandsignificancethresholdsforusebylocalagencies,buttheyarenowauthorizedtodosobytheAppellatecourt.
OtherairqualityplansBAAQMDhasadoptedincludetheBayArea2001OzoneAttainmentPlan(OzonePlan),aimedatreducingozoneandachievingtheNAAQSozonestandard.TheARBpreparedaRedesignationRequest,AttainmentDemonstration,andMaintenancePlanforcarbonmonoxide(CO)in1996thatincludesstrategiestoensurecontinuingattainmentoftheNAAQSforCO;thisplanwassubsequentlyrevisedin1998and2004.In2010,thedistrictalsoadoptedthe2010CleanAirPlan,whichupdatestheOzonePlanandprovidesanintegrated,multi‐pollutantstrategytoimproveairquality,protectpublichealth,andprotecttheclimate.
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
SJVAPCDistheregionalairqualityagencywithjurisdictionovertheSJVAB.AlthoughtheprogramareaislocatedwithinBAAQMD’sjurisdiction,itisassumedthattruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSJVABtotheprogramarea.BecausetheprogramareaislocatedintheSFBAAB,theSJVAPCDrulesandcleanairplanswouldnotbeapplicabletotheprogram.However,inordertodiscloseairqualityimpactswithintheSJVAB,thisanalysisincludesdiscussionofpotentialimpactsassociatedwithheavy‐dutytruckemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedwithintheSJVAB.Inaddition,becausetheSJVABisdownwindoftheprojectsitesomeemissionsthatareemittedattheprojectsitewithintheSFBAABwouldlikelydriftintotheSJVABthroughaprocessknownastransport.TheARBhasidentifiedtheSFBAABasatransportcontributortotheSJVAB(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2009).FordetailedstudiesofpollutanttransportwithinCalifornia,pleaserefertohttp://www.arb.ca.gov/aqd/transport/transport.htm.However,itisextremelydifficultandwouldbespeculativetodeterminethequantityofemissionsthatwilltraverseairbasinboundariesduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweather.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimated.ProjectemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABareassessedusingsignificancethresholdsidentifiedinSJVAPCD’sGuideforAssessingandMitigatingAirQualityImpacts(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002).
Alameda County General Plan—East County Area Plan
TheECAP,apartoftheAlamedaCountyGeneralPlan,containsairqualitygoalsandpoliciestoaddressairpollutionconcernsintheeasternareaofthecounty.TheECAPairqualitygoalisto“ensurethatairpollutionlevelsdonotthreatenpublichealthandsafety,economicdevelopment,orfuturegrowth”(AlamedaCounty2000:70).TheECAPwaslastrevisedin2000bythevoterinitiativeMeasureD;however,itdidnotresultinanychangestopoliciesregardingairquality.ECAPpoliciesapplicabletotheprogramincludethoselistedbelow(AlamedaCounty2000:70–71).
Policy296:TheCountyshallreviewthecumulativeimpactofproposedprojectsfortheirpotentialeffectonairqualityconditions.
Policy297:TheCountyshallcoordinateairqualityplanningeffortswithotherlocal,regionalandstateagencies.
Page 7
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐7
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Policy300:TheCountyshallreviewproposedprojectsfortheirpotentialtogeneratehazardousairpollutants.
Policy302:TheCountyshallincludebufferzoneswithinnewresidentialandsensitivereceptorsiteplanstoseparatethoseusesfromfreeways,arterials,pointsourcesandhazardousmateriallocations.
Policy303:TheCountyshallincorporatetheprovisionsoftheAssociationofBayAreaGovernment's(ABAG)BayAreaAirQualityPlanandtheBayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict's(BAAQMD)AirQualityandUrbanDevelopmentGuidelinesintoprojectreviewprocedures.
Policy304:TheCountyshallnotifycitiesandtheBayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict(BAAQMD)ofproposedprojectswhichmaysignificantlyaffectairquality.
Environmental Setting
Regional Topography, Meteorology, and Climate
Thetopographyoftheprogramareaisdominatedbynorthwest‐southeast‐trendingridgelinesthatreachanelevationofapproximately800to1,400feetabovemeansealevel(msl).Theelevationsofinterveningvalleybottomsintheprogramareaarefromapproximately400to800feetabovemsl.TheclimateoftheSFBAABisdeterminedlargelybyahigh‐pressuresystemthatisalmostalwayspresentovertheeasternPacificOceanoffthewestcoastofNorthAmerica.Highpressuresystemsarecharacterizedbyanupperlayerofdryairthatwarmsasitdescends,whichrestrictsthemobilityofcoolermarine‐influencedairnearthegroundsurfaceandresultsintheformationofsubsidenceinversions.Duringthewinter,thePacifichigh‐pressuresystemshiftssouthward,therebyallowingstormstopassthroughtheregion.Duringsummerandfall,emissionsgeneratedwithintheSFBAABcancombinewithabundantsunshineundertherestraininginfluencesoftopographyandsubsidenceinversionstocreateconditionsthatareconducivetotheformationofphotochemicalpollutants,suchasozone.
Theprogramareaisgenerallywell‐ventilatedbywinds.Winterprevailingwinddirectionsspanthenorth‐northeastthrougheast‐northeastsectors,causedbydrainageoffofthehillsandflowoutoftheAltamontPass.Duringthesummermonths,coldwaterupwellingalongthecoastandhotinlandtemperaturescancauseastrongonshorepressuregradientthattranslatesintoastrong,afternoonwind.BAAQMDoperatesaregionalairqualitymonitoringnetwork;thecloseststationtotheprogramareaistheLivermoreMonitoringStationonRinconAvenueintheCityofLivermore,whichisapproximately9milestothesouth‐southwest.InLivermore,over70%ofthewindisfromthesouth‐southwesttowest‐southwest,andbytheafternoon,35%ofthewindspeedisabout11milesperhour(mph).However,theprogramareatendstobeareceptorofozoneandozoneprecursorsfromSanFrancisco,Alameda,westernandnorthernContraCostaCounty,andSantaClaraCountyand,duringthesummermonths,temperaturestendtobewarm,whichpromotestheformationofozone(BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict2010).Inturn,theSJVABandtheCentralValleyingeneralthatisdownwindoftheprogramareaalsoisareceptorofthesesamepollutants,accumulat‐ingwithemissionsfromtheTri‐ValleyareaandtosomedegreenorthernContraCostaCountyandsouthernSolanoCounty.TheARBhasidentifiedtheSFBAABasatransportcontributortotheSacramentoregion,theMountainCountiesAirBasin,theNorthCentralCoastAirBasin,theNorthCoastAirBasin,theSanJoaquinValleyAirBasin,andtheSouthCentralCoastAirBasin(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2010).
Page 8
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐8
October 2014ICF 00323.08
TemperatureandprecipitationdatacollectedinLivermoreindicatethattheprogramareatypicallyhasaveragemaximumandminimumwinter(i.e.,January)temperaturesof57and37degreesFahrenheit(°F),respectively,whileaveragesummer(i.e.,July)maximumandminimumtemperaturesare89and54°F,respectively.Precipitationintheprogramareaaveragesapproximately14inchesperyear(WesternRegionalClimateCenter2013).
Air Pollutants of Concern
ThefederalgovernmenthasestablishedNAAQS,andthestatehasestablishedCAAQS,respectively,forsixcriteriapollutants:ozone,CO,lead(Pb),nitrogendioxide(NO2),sulfurdioxide(SO2),andPM.
OzoneandNO2areconsideredregionalpollutantsbecausethey(ortheirprecursors)affectairqualityonaregionalscale;NO2reactsphotochemicallywithreactiveorganicgases(ROGs)toformozone,andthisreactionoccursatsomedistancedownwindofthesourceofpollutants.PollutantssuchasCO,SO2,andPbareconsideredtobelocalpollutantsthattendtoaccumulateintheairlocally.PMisconsideredtobealocalaswellasaregionalpollutant.
Theprimarypollutantsofconcerninthestudyareaareozone(includingnitrogenoxides[NOX]),CO,andPM.Principalcharacteristicssurroundingthesepollutantsarediscussedbelow.TACsarealsodiscussed,althoughnoairqualitystandardsexistforthesepollutants.
Ozone
Ozoneisarespiratoryirritantthatcancausesevereear,nose,andthroatirritationandincreasesusceptibilitytorespiratoryinfections.Itisalsoanoxidantthatcancauseextensivedamagetoplantsthroughleafdiscolorationandcelldamage.Itcancausesubstantialdamagetoothermaterialsaswell,suchassyntheticrubberandtextiles.
Ozoneisnotemitteddirectlyintotheairbutisformedbyaphotochemicalreactionintheatmosphere.Ozoneprecursors—ROGandNOX—reactintheatmosphereinthepresenceofsunlighttoformozone.Becausephotochemicalreactionratesdependontheintensityofultravioletlightandairtemperature,ozoneisprimarilyasummerairpollutionproblem.Theozoneprecursors,ROGandNOX,aremainlyemittedbymobilesourcesandbystationarycombustionequipment.
Hydrocarbonsareorganicgasesthataremadeupofhydrogenandcarbonatoms.Thereareseveralsubsetsoforganicgases,includingROGsandvolatileorganiccompounds(VOCs).ROGsaredefinedbystaterulesandregulations;VOCsaredefinedbyfederalrulesandregulations.Forthepurposesofthisassessment,hydrocarbonsareclassifiedandreferredtoasROGs.BothROGsandVOCsareemittedfromtheincompletecombustionofhydrocarbonsorothercarbon‐basedfuelsorasaproductofchemicalprocesses.Themajorsourcesofhydrocarbonsarecombustionengineexhaust,oilrefineries,andoil‐fueledpowerplants;othercommonsourcesarepetroleumfuels,solvents,dry‐cleaningsolutions,andpaint(throughevaporation).
Thehealtheffectsofhydrocarbonsresultfromtheformationofozone.Highlevelsofhydrocarbonsintheatmospherecaninterferewithoxygenintakebyreducingtheamountofavailableoxygenthoughdisplacement.CarcinogenicformsofhydrocarbonsareconsideredTACs.TherearenoseparatehealthstandardsforROGs,althoughsomearealsotoxic;forexample,benzeneisbothaROGandacarcinogen.
Page 9
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐9
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Nitrogen Oxides
Nitrogenoxidesareafamilyofhighlyreactivegasesthatareaprimaryprecursortotheformationofground‐levelozoneandreactintheatmospheretoformacidrain.Nitrogendioxide,oftenusedinterchangeablywithNOX,isabrownish,highlyreactivegasthatispresentinallurbanenvironments.ThemajorhumansourcesofNO2arecombustiondevices,suchasboilers,gasturbines,andmobileandstationaryreciprocatinginternalcombustionengines.Combustiondevicesemitprimarilynitricoxide(NO),whichreactsthroughoxidationintheatmospheretoformNO2(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2013a).ThecombinedemissionsofNOandNO2arereferredtoasNOXandreportedasequivalentNO2.BecauseNO2isformedanddepletedbyreactionsassociatedwithozone,theNO2concentrationinaparticulargeographicalareamaynotberepresentativeoflocalNOXemissionsources.
InhalationisthemostcommonrouteofexposuretoNO2.BecauseNO2hasrelativelylowsolubilityinwater,theprincipalsiteoftoxicityisinthelowerrespiratorytract.Theseverityoftheadversehealtheffectsprimarilydependsontheconcentrationinhaledratherthanthedurationofexposure.Anindividualmayexperienceavarietyofacutesymptoms,suchascoughing,difficultybreathing,vomiting,headache,andeyeirritationduringorshortlyafterexposure.Afteraperiodofapproximately4to12hours,anexposedindividualmayexperiencechemicalpneumonitisorpulmonaryedemawithbreathingabnormalities,cough,cyanosis,chestpain,andrapidheartbeat.SeveresymptomaticNO2intoxicationafteracuteexposurehasbeenlinkedtoprolongedrespiratoryimpairment,withsuchsymptomsasemphysema,bronchitis,andaggravatingexistingheatdisease(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2013b).
Carbon Monoxide
CarbonMonoxide(CO),acolorlessandodorlessgas,interfereswiththetransferofoxygentothebrain.Itcancausedizzinessandfatigueandcanimpaircentralnervoussystemfunctions.COisemittedalmostexclusivelyfromtheincompletecombustionoffossilfuels.Inurbanareas,motorvehicles,powerplants,refineries,industrialboilers,ships,aircraft,andtrainsemitCO.AutomobileexhaustreleasesmostoftheCOinurbanareas.COisanonreactiveairpollutantthatdissipatesrelativelyquickly,soambientCOconcentrationsgenerallyfollowthespatialandtemporaldistributionsofvehiculartraffic.COconcentrationsareinfluencedbylocalmeteorologicalconditions—primarilywindspeed,topography,andatmosphericstability.COfrommotorvehicleexhaustcanbecomelocallyconcentratedwhensurface‐basedtemperatureinversionsarecombinedwithcalmatmosphericconditions,atypicalsituationatduskinurbanareasbetweenNovemberandFebruary.BecausemotorvehiclesarethedominantsourceofCOemissions,COhotspotsarenormallylocatednearroadsandfreewayswithhightrafficvolume.
Particulate Matter
Particulatematterpollutionconsistsofverysmallliquidandsolidparticlesfloatingintheair,whichcanincludesmoke,soot,dust,salts,acids,andmetals.PMalsoformswhengasesemittedfromindustriesandmotorvehiclesundergochemicalreactionsintheatmosphere.Particulatematterlessthan10micronsindiameter,about1/7thethicknessofahumanhair,isreferredtoasPM10.Particulatematterthatis2.5micronsorlessindiameter,roughly1/28thediameterofahumanhair,isreferredtoasPM2.5.MajorsourcesofPM10includemotorvehicles;woodburningstovesandfireplaces;dustfromconstruction,landfills,andagriculture;wildfiresandbrush/wasteburning;industrialsources;windblowndustfromopenlands;andatmosphericchemicalandphotochemicalreactions.PM2.5resultsfromfuelcombustion(frommotorvehicles,powergeneration,and
Page 10
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐10
October 2014ICF 00323.08
industrialfacilities),residentialfireplaces,andwoodstoves.Inaddition,PM10andPM2.5canbeformedintheatmospherefromgasessuchasSO2,NOX,andVOCs.
PM10andPM2.5poseagreaterhealthriskthanlarger‐sizeparticles.Wheninhaled,thesetinyparticlescanpenetratethehumanrespiratorysystem’snaturaldefensesanddamagetherespiratorytract.PM10andPM2.5canincreasethenumberandseverityofasthmaattacks,causeoraggravatebronchitisandotherlungdiseases,andreducethebody’sabilitytofightinfections.Verysmallparticlesofsubstances,suchaslead,sulfates,andnitrates,cancauselungdamagedirectly.Thesesubstancescanbeabsorbedintothebloodstreamandcausedamageelsewhereinthebody;theycanalsotransportabsorbedgasessuchaschloridesorammoniumintothelungsandcauseinjury.Whereasparticles2.5to10micronsindiametertendtocollectintheupperportionoftherespiratorysystem,particles2.5micronsorlessaresotinythattheycanpenetratedeeperintothelungsanddamagelungtissues.Suspendedparticulatesalsodamageanddiscolorsurfacesonwhichtheysettle,andcontributetohazeandreduceregionalvisibility.
Toxic Air Contaminants
AlthoughNAAQSandCAAQSexistforcriteriapollutants,noambientstandardsexistforTACs.ManypollutantsareidentifiedasTACsbecauseoftheirpotentialtoincreasetheriskofdevelopingcancerorotheracute(short‐term)orchronic(long‐term)healthproblems.ForTACsthatareknownorsuspectedcarcinogens,ARBhasconsistentlyfoundthattherearenolevelsorthresholdsbelowwhichexposureisriskfree.IndividualTACsvarygreatlyintheriskstheypresent;atagivenlevelofexposure,oneTACmayposeahazardthatismanytimesgreaterthananother.ForcertainTACs,aunitriskfactorcanbedevelopedtoevaluatecancerrisk.Foracuteandchronichealtheffects,asimilarfactor,calledaHazardIndex,isusedtoevaluaterisk.TACsareidentifiedandtheirtoxicityisstudiedbytheCaliforniaOfficeofEnvironmentalHealthHazardAssessment(OEHHA).ExamplesofTACsourcesincludeindustrialprocesses,drycleaners,gasolinestations,paintandsolventoperations,andfossilfuelcombustionsources.
Sulfur Oxides
Sulfuroxidesareanyofseveralcompoundsofsulfurandoxygen,ofwhichthemostrelevanttoairqualityisSO2.SO2isarespiratoryirritantthatcausesthebronchiolestoconstrictwithinhalationat5partspermillion(ppm)ormore.Oncontactwiththemoistmucousmembranes,SO2producessulfurousacid,whichisadirectirritant.Concentrationratherthandurationoftheexposureisanimportantdeterminantofrespiratoryeffects.ExposuretohighSO2concentrationsmayresultinedemaofthelungsorglottisandrespiratoryparalysis.SO2isproducedbycoalandoilcombustionandsuchstationarysourcesassteelmills,refineries,andpulpandpapermills.
Lead
Lead(Pb)isametalthatisanaturalconstituentofair,water,andthebiosphere.Leadisneithercreatednordestroyedintheenvironment,soitpersistsforever.Leadwasusedseveraldecadesagotoincreasetheoctaneratinginautomotivefuel;therefore,gasoline‐poweredautomobileengineswereamajorsourceofairbornelead.Sincetheuseofleadedfuelhasbeenmostlyphasedout,theambientconcentrationsofleadhavedroppeddramatically.
Short‐termexposuretohighlevelsofleadcancausevomiting,diarrhea,convulsions,coma,orevendeath.However,evensmallamountsofleadcanbeharmful,especiallytoinfants,youngchildren,andpregnantwomen.Leadexposureismostseriousforyoungchildrenbecausetheyabsorblead
Page 11
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐11
October 2014ICF 00323.08
moreeasilythanadultsandaremoresusceptibletoitsharmfuleffects.Evenlow‐levelexposuremayharmtheintellectualdevelopment,behavior,size,andhearingofinfants.Duringpregnancy,especiallyinthelasttrimester,leadcanadverselyaffectthefetus.Femaleworkersexposedtohighlevelsofleadhavemoremiscarriagesandstillbirths.
Symptomsoflong‐termexposuretolowerleadlevelsmaybelessnoticeablebutarestillserious.Anemiaiscommon,anddamagetothenervoussystemmaycauseimpairedmentalfunction.Othersymptomsareappetiteloss,abdominalpain,constipation,fatigue,sleeplessness,irritability,andheadache.Continuedexcessiveexposure,asinanindustrialsetting,canaffectthekidneys.
Diesel Particulate Matter
In1998,ARBidentifiedDPMasatoxicaircontaminant(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard1998).Onastatewidebasis,theaveragepotentialcancerriskassociatedwithDPMismorethan500potentialcasespermillionpeople.TheOEHHAestimatedthepotentialcancerriskfroma70‐yearexposuretoDPMataconcentrationof1microgrampercubicmeter(µg/m3)rangesfrom130to2,400excesscancercasespermillionpeople.Ascientificreviewpanelconcludedthatanappropriatepointestimateofunitriskfora70‐yearexposuretoDPMis300excesscancercasespermillionpeople(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2000).
TheDPMofgreatesthealthconcernarethoseinthecategoriesoffine(PM10)andultra‐fine(PM2.5).Thesefineandultra‐fineparticlesmaybecomposedofelementalcarbonwithadsorbedcompounds,suchasorganiccompounds,sulfate,nitrate,metals,andothertraceelements.Thefineandultra‐fineparticlesarerespirable,whichmeansthattheycanavoidmanyofthehumanrespiratorysystemdefensemechanismsandenterdeeplyintothelungs.
Existing Air Quality Conditions
Existingairqualityconditionsinthestudyareacanbecharacterizedbymonitoringdatacollectedintheregion.ThoughtheLivermore–793RinconAvenuemonitoringstationisthecloseststationtotheprogramarea,thismonitoringstationdoesnotreportCOorPM10conditionsinthearea.TheclosestmonitoringstationtomonitorCOistheFremont–ChapelWaymonitoringstationlocatedapproximately20mileswestandmostlyupwindoftheprogramarea.TheclosestmonitoringstationtomonitorPM10istheTracy–Airportmonitoringstationlocatedapproximately12mileseastoftheprogramareainSanJoaquinCounty.RecentairqualitymonitoringresultsfromthesestationsaresummarizedinTable3.3‐2.Thedatarepresentairqualitymonitoringforthelast3yearsforwhichacompletedatasetisavailable(2010–2012).AsindicatedinTable3.3‐2,therehavebeensomeviolationsofstateandfederalairqualitystandardsduringthistimeperiodforozoneandPM2.5.
Page 12
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐12
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.3‐2. Summary of 2010‐2012 Ambient Air Quality in the Program Area Vicinity
PollutantStandards 2010 2011 2012
Ozone(O3)—Livermore–795 RinconAvenue
Maximum1‐hourconcentration(ppm) 0.150 0.115 0.102
DaysexceedingatheCAAQS1‐hourstandard(>0.09ppm) 3 3 2
Maximum8‐hourconcentration(ppm) 0.098 0.085 0.090
DaysexceedingatheCAAQS8‐hour(>0.070ppm) 6 9 4
DaysexceedingatheNAAQS8‐hour(>0.075ppm) 3 2 3
Carbonmonoxide(CO)—Fremont–ChapelWay
Maximum8‐hourconcentration(ppm) 0.94 – –
DaysexceedingatheNAAQS8‐hour(>9ppm) 0 0 0
DaysexceedingatheCAAQS8‐hour(>9.0ppm) 0 0 0
NitrogenDioxide(NO2)—Livermore–795 RinconAvenue
Statemaximum1‐hourconcentration(ppm) 0.058 0.057 0.043
Annualaverageconcentration(ppm) 0.011 0.011 –
DaysexceedingatheCAAQS1‐hour(0.18ppm) 0 0 0
Particulatematter(PM10)—Tracy–Airport
Nationalbmaximum24‐hourconcentration(g/m3) 28.5 110.8 73.4
Statecmaximum24‐hourconcentration(g/m3) – – –
DaysexceedingatheNAAQS24‐hour(>150g/m3)g 0 0 0
DaysexceedingatheCAAQS24‐hour(>50g/m3)g – – –
Particulatematter(PM2.5)—Livermore–795 RinconAvenue
Nationalbmaximum24‐hourconcentration(g/m3) 34.7 45.4 31.1
Statecmaximum24‐hourconcentration(g/m3) 34.7 23.6 –
DaysexceedingatheNAAQS24‐hour(>35g/m3) 0 2 0
Source:CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013b.ppm = partspermillion.CAAQS = CaliforniaAmbientAirQualityStandards.NAAQS = NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards.g/m3 = microgramspercubicmeter.– = datanotavailable.a Anexceedanceisnotnecessarilyaviolation.Thisisamathematicalestimateofhowmanydaysconcentrationswouldhavebeenmeasuredashigherthanthelevelofthestandardhadeachdaybeenmonitored.Valueshavebeenrounded.
b Measurementsusuallyarecollectedevery6days.c Statecriteriaforensuringthatdataaresufficientlycompleteforcalculatingvalidannualaveragesaremorestringentthanthenationalcriteria.
Page 13
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐13
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Attainment Status
Localmonitoringdata(Table3.3‐2)areusedtodesignateareasasnonattainment,maintenance,attainment,orunclassifiedfortheNAAQSandCAAQS.Thefourdesignationsaredefinedasfollows.
Nonattainment—assignedtoareaswheremonitoredpollutantconcentrationsconsistentlyviolatethestandardinquestion.
Maintenance—assignedtoareaswheremonitoredpollutantconcentrationsexceededthestandardinquestioninthepastbutarenolongerinviolationofthatstandard.
Attainment—assignedtoareaswherepollutantconcentrationsmeetthestandardinquestionoveradesignatedperiodoftime.
Unclassified—assignedtoareasweredataareinsufficienttodeterminewhetherapollutantisviolatingthestandardinquestion.
Table3.3‐3summarizestheattainmentstatusofAlamedaCountywithregardtotheNAAQSandCAAQS.Table3.3‐4summarizestheattainmentstatusoftheSJVABwithregardtotheNAAQSandCAAQS(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2013).
Table 3.3‐3. Federal and State Attainment Status for Alameda County
CriteriaPollutant FederalDesignation StateDesignation
O3(1‐hour) (Nofederalstandard)a SeriousNonattainment
O3(8‐hour) MarginalNonattainment(2008) Nonattainment
CO Maintenance Attainment
PM10 Attainment Nonattainment
PM2.5 Nonattainment(2006) Nonattainment
NO2 Attainment Attainment
SO2 Attainment Attainment
Lead Attainment(2008) Attainment
Sulfates (NoFederalStandard) AttainmentHydrogensulfide (NoFederalStandard) UnclassifiedVisibility (NoFederalStandard) UnclassifiedSources:CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2011;U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency2012.O3 = ozone.CO = carbonmonoxide.PM10 = particulatematterlessthanorequalto10microns.PM2.5 = particulatematterlessthanorequalto2.5microns.NO2 = nitrogendioxide.SO2 = sulfurdioxide.a Thefederal1‐hourstandardof12partsperhundredmillion(pphm)wasineffectfrom1979throughJune15,2005.Therevokedstandardisreferencedherebecauseitwasemployedforsuchalongperiodandbecausethisbenchmarkisaddressedinthestateimplementationplans.
Page 14
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐14
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.3‐4. Federal and State Attainment Status for San Joaquin Valley
CriteriaPollutant FederalDesignation StateDesignation
O3(1‐hour) (NoFederalStandard) SevereNonattainment
O3(8‐hour) ExtremeNonattainment Nonattainment
CO Attainment Attainment
PM10 Attainment Nonattainment
PM2.5 Nonattainment(2006) Nonattainment
NO2 Attainment Attainment
SO2 Attainment Attainment
Lead NoDesignation Attainment
Sulfates (NoFederalStandard) AttainmentHydrogensulfide (NoFederalStandard) UnclassifiedVisibility (NoFederalStandard) UnclassifiedO3 = ozone.CO = carbonmonoxide.PM10 = particulatematterlessthanorequalto10microns.PM2.5 = particulatematterlessthanorequalto2.5microns.NO2 = nitrogendioxide.SO2 = sulfurdioxide.
Sensitive Receptors
Forthepurposesofairqualityanalysis,sensitivelandusesaredefinedaslocationswherehumanpopulations,especiallychildren,seniors,andsickpersonsarelocatedandwherethereisreasonableexpectationofcontinuoushumanexposureaccordingtotheaveragingperiodfortheairqualitystandards(e.g.,24‐hour,8‐hour,and1‐hour).Typicalsensitivereceptorsincluderesidences,hospitals,andschools.WhiletheprogramareaislocatedintheruralsettingoftheAltamontPass,sensitivereceptorsintheprogramareavicinityincludescatteredresidencesthroughoutandadjacenttotheprogramarea.AsindicatedinChapter2ofthisPEIR,ProgramDescription,AlamedaCountyhasestablishedsetbackrequirementsforsitingturbineswithincertaintypesoflanduses(e.g.,residential,commercial,recreational),andinfrastructure(publicroads),andturbineswouldnotbelocatedwithinthesesetbackdistances.Outsidetheprogramarea,approximately4,500feettothewestoftheprogramareaisacommunityofsinglefamilyresidencesinthecityofLivermore,and5,000feettotheeastisthecommunityofMountainHouse,whichcontainssinglefamilyresidences,threeelementaryschoolsandchildcarefacilities,andpublicparksandopenspaces.
3.3.2 Environmental Impacts
Methods for Analysis
Criteriapollutantemissionswereestimatedforconstructionandoperationalactivitiesataprogrammaticlevelwithadditionaldetailgiventotwospecificrepoweringprojects,theGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjects,whichfallwithintheprogramarea.Emissionswerecalculatedforatypical80MWrepoweringprojectusingprojectdatafromtheVascoWindsRepoweringProjectDraftEnvironmentalImpactReport(ContraCostaCounty2010).Thiswasdonebecauseproject‐specificinformationfortheproposedprojectswasverylimited,andtherepoweringactivitiesarenotyet
Page 15
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐15
October 2014ICF 00323.08
determined.BecausetheVascoexampleprovidesacomprehensiveanalysisoftypicalconstructionactivityforrepowering,itwasusedtoestimatetotalanddailyemissionsfortheproposedprojects,asitisconsideredrepresentativeofatypicalprojectassociatedwiththeprogram.TotalemissionsfromtheVascoexamplewerethenscaledtotheprogramandtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjectsbasedonthenameplatecapacityoftheprogramarea.Thescalingfactorsfortotalconstructionemissionsareasfollows:5.21forprogramAlternative1:417MW(416.5MWnameplatecapacity÷80MWmetricnameplatecapacity);5.63forprogramAlternative2:450MW(450MWnameplatecapacity÷80MWmetricnameplatecapacity);1.11fortheGoldenHillsProject(88.4MWnameplatecapacity÷80MWmetricnameplatecapacity);and0.25forthePattersonPassProject(19.8MWnameplatecapacity÷80MWmetricnameplatecapacity).AnnualconstructionemissionsfromtheVascoexamplewerealsoscaledtotheprogramandtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjectsusingamaximumannualnameplatecapacityof100MWinstalled.Thisproducesascalingfactorof1.25toestimateannualemissionsfrombothAlternative1andAlternative2(100MWmaximum÷80MWmetricnameplatecapacity).SincethenameplatecapacityoftheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjectsarelessthan100MW,itwasassumedthatallemissionsfromtheseprojectswouldoccurduringonecalendaryear.
Constructionemissionswereestimatedforeachphaseofconstructionforthreemajorcontributors:offroadequipment,onroadvehicles(includingtrucktripsandworkercommutes),andconcretebatchplantoperations.Calculationmethodsfromthefollowingsourceswereusedtoestimateemissions:theCaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel(CalEEMod)(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2011),theEPAEmissionsFactors&AP42CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactorsdocument(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995a,1995b,1995c),andtheARBEMissionFACtors(EMFAC)2011model(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013c).Additionalstandardemissionfactors,conversionfactors,andmethodswereusedtoestimateemissionsperstandardairqualityprotocolconsistentwithBAAQMDguidance.
Operationalemissionswereestimatedforoffroadequipment(maintenance/operationactivities)andonroadvehicles(includingtrucktripsandworkercommutes).Calculationmethodsfromthesamesourcesaslistedaboveforconstructionemissionswereusedtoestimateoperationalemissions.
Theconcretebatchplantwouldproducefugitivedustemissionsduringthemanufactureofconcrete.Approximately0.0157poundsofPM10wouldbeemittedpercubicyardofconcreteproduced(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995c).ItwasassumedthatPM2.5represents0.674%ofPM10(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2006).Stationarysourceemissionsfromfuelcombustionatthebatchplantswerenotestimatedbecausespecificdataonthetypesofequipment(generators,engines,etc.)thatwouldbeusedatthebatchplantswerenotavailable.Inaddition,thebatchplantsarepermittedsourcesunderBAAQMDandemissionswouldbeminorafterrequiredairdistrictBestAvailableControlTechnologies(BACTs)andoffsets.
Importantassumptions(associatedwiththe80MWprojectexample)usedintheanalysisarepresentedbelow.
Emissionswereestimatedforatypical80MWrepoweringprojectandscaledtotheprogram,GoldenHillsProject,andPattersonPassProjectbasedonthenameplatecapacityoftheprogramareaandthetwoprojectareas.
Page 16
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐16
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Fortheprogramalternatives,themaximumannualnameplatecapacityinstalledis100MW.Thisproducesascalingfactorof1.25foremissionsfromthe80MWprojectVascoexampletoestimateannualemissionsfrombothAlternative1andAlternative2.
Offroadequipmenttypes,fueltypes,andphasing(daysofconstructionforeachconstructionphaseforeachmonthoftheyear)forconstructionandoperationalactivitiesweretakenfromtheVascoWindsRepoweringProjectDraftEnvironmentalImpactReport(ContraCostaCounty2010).
Constructionactivitywilloccur8hoursperday,5daysperweek.
FugitivedustemissionsfromgradingarecalculatedforgradersandbulldozersusingCalEEModmethods,whichcalculateemissionsonaper‐milebasisforgradersandaper‐hourbasisforbulldozers.Eachgradertravelsatanaveragespeedof7.1mphwithabladewidthof12feettocover292totalacresforatotalmileageofgradingof201miles(8.3milesaverageperday).Eachbulldozeroperates8hoursperdayduringconstruction.
Therewillbe10,800annual(55averagedaily)light‐dutytrucktrips,16,605annual(85averagedaily)heavy‐dutytrucktripsformaterialdeliveryandremoval,and6,338annual(33averagedaily)heavy‐dutytrucktripsforwaterdelivery(watertankers).
Eachlight‐dutytripwillinclude1.0mileof15mphtravel(ridgeline),1.0mileof25mphtravel(accessroads),and23milesof55mphtravel(freeway),foratotalroundtripdistanceof25miles.
Eachheavy‐dutytripwillinclude5.0milesof15mphtravel(ridgeline),1.0mileof25mphtravel(accessroads),and29milesof55mphtravel(freeway)foratotalroundtripdistanceof35miles.Eachwatertankertrucktripwouldinclude6.0milesof15mphtravel(ridgeline),1.0mileof25mphtravel(accessroads),and19milesof55mphtravel(freeway),foratotalroundtripdistanceof26miles.
Workercommuteroundtripsare25miles;workervehiclestravelatanaverageof55mph.Therewillbe16,790annual(86averagedailyand150maximumdaily)workercommutetripsforconstructionand2,226annual(8.5averagedaily)workercommutetripsforoperation.
Approximately3,500cubicyardsofconcretewillbeproducedattheconcretebatchplantsperyear(55cubicyardsonaverageperday).
Determination of Significance
InaccordancewithAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelines,programAlternative1,programAlternative2,theGoldenHillsproject,orthePattersonPassprojectwouldbenormallyconsideredtohaveasignificanteffectifitwouldresultinanyoftheconditionslistedbelow.
Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan.
Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation.
Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprogramorprojectregionisanonattainmentareaforanapplicablefederalorstateambientairqualitystandard(includingreleasingemissionsthatexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors).
Page 17
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐17
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations.
Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople
AccordingtotheStateCEQAGuidelines,thesignificancecriteriaestablishedbytheapplicableairqualitymanagementorairpollutioncontroldistrictmaybereliedontomakesignificancedeterminationsforpotentialimpactsonenvironmentalresources.Consequently,theanalysisusedinthisdocumentusesmethodologiesprovidedintheupdatedBAAQMDGuidelines(BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict2012).Althoughthe2010BAAQMDGuidelinesandtheir2011updatehavebeenchallengedincourt,andBAAQMDhasremovedallreferencesofthe2010/2011adoptedthresholdsfromthe2012BAAQMDGuidelines,the2010/2011BAAQMDGuidelinescontainquantitativesignificancethresholdsforproject‐relatedconstructionexhaustemissionsandoperationalemissions.Becausethe2010/2011thresholdsaremorestringentandcomprehensivethanthe1999thresholds(asrecommendedforuseinthe2012BAAQMDGuidelines),the2010/2011thresholdsareusedtodeterminesignificanceforconstructionandoperationalactivities(BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict2011).Therearenoquantitativethresholdsforconstructionimpactsassociatedwithfugitivedust,sotheseimpactsareaddressedusingapplicableBAAQMD‐recommendedmitigationmeasuresfordustabatement.
Underthe2010/2011BAAQMDthresholds,aprojectwouldhaveasignificantshort‐termconstruction‐relatedorlong‐termoperationalairqualityimpactifitwouldexceedBAAQMD’sthresholdsshowninTable3.3‐5.
Table 3.3‐5. BAAQMD Thresholds of Significance
Pollutant Construction Operations
ROG 54lbs/day 54lbs/dayor10tons/year
NOX 54lbs/day 54lbs/dayor10tons/year
CO – ViolationofCAAQS
PM10(total) – –
PM10(exhaust) 82lbs/day 82lbs/dayor15tons/year
PM2.5(exhaust) 54lbs/day 54lbs/dayor10tons/year
PM10/PM2.5(fugitivedust)
BMPs –
TACs(project‐level) Increasedcancerriskof10in1million;increasednon‐cancerriskofgreaterthan1.0(hazardindex[HI]);PM2.5increaseofgreaterthan0.3microgramspercubicmeter
Sameasconstruction
TACs(cumulative) Increasedcancerriskof100in1million;increasednon‐cancerriskofgreaterthan10.0;PM2.5increaseofgreaterthan0.8microgrampercubicmeteratreceptorswithin1,000feet
Sameasconstruction
Odors – Fivecomplaintsperyearaveragedover3years
Source:BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict2011.lbs = pounds.CAAQS = CaliforniaAmbientAirQualityStandards.BMPs = bestmanagementpractices.
Page 18
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐18
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Bothaveragedailyandmaximumdailyemissionswerecalculatedfortheproject,andmaximumdailyemissionswerecomparedtothedailythresholdslistedinTable3.3‐5,pertherecommendationofBAAQMDstaff(Kirkpers.comm.).
ForprojectsthatwouldresultinanincreaseinROG,NOX,PM10,orPM2.5ofmorethantheirrespectiveproject‐leveldailymassthresholdsindicatedinTable3.3‐5,thenitwouldalsobeconsideredtocontributeconsiderablytoasignificantcumulativeimpact.Indevelopingthresholdsofsignificanceforairpollutants,BAAQMDconsideredtheemissionlevelsforwhichaproject’sindividualemissionswouldbecumulativelyconsiderable.Therefore,ifaprojectwouldexceedtheproject‐levelsignificancethresholdsidentifiedinTable3.3‐5,itsemissionswouldbecumulativelyconsiderable;ifaprojectwouldnotexceedthesignificancethresholds,itsemissionswouldnotbecumulativelyconsiderable.
InadditiontoemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedinBAAQMD’sjurisdiction,theportionofequipmentandmaterialhaultripsthatwouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracywouldbegeneratedintheSJVAB,whichisunderSJVAPCD’sjurisdiction.Therefore,theheavy‐dutytrucktripexhaustemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABhavebeenquantified.Inaddition,theSJVABisdownwindoftheprojectsiteandmayreceivesomeemissionsthatareemittedattheprojectsitewithintheSFBAABduetotransport.However,itisextremelydifficultandwouldbespeculativetodeterminethequantityofemissionsthatwilltraverseairbasinboundariesduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweather.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimatednorcomparedtotheSJVAPCD’sthresholds.
SJVAPCD’spublishedguidelines,GuideforAssessingAirQualityImpacts(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002),donotrequirethequantificationofconstructionemissions.Rather,itrequiresimplementationofeffectiveandcomprehensivefeasiblecontrolmeasurestoreducePM10emissions(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002).SJVAPCDconsidersPM10emissionstobethegreatestpollutantofconcernwhenassessingconstruction‐relatedairqualityimpactsandhasdeterminedthatcompliancewithitsRegulationVIII,includingimplementationofallfeasiblecontrolmeasuresspecifiedinitsguidancemanual(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002),constitutessufficientmitigationtoreduceconstruction‐relatedPM10emissionstoless‐than‐significantlevelsandminimizeadverseairqualityeffects.AllconstructionprojectsmustabidebyRegulationVIII.Sincethepublicationofthedistrict’sguidancemanual,thedistricthasrevisedsomeoftherulescomprisingRegulationVIII.GuidancefromdistrictstaffindicatesthatimplementationofadustcontrolplanwouldsatisfyalloftherequirementsofRegulationVIII(Siongpers.comm.).FurtherconsultationwithSJVAPCDstaffindicatesthat,thoughexplicitthresholdsforconstruction‐relatedemissionsofozoneprecursorsarenotenumeratedintheguidancemanual,SJVAPCDconsidersasignificantimpacttooccurwhenconstructionemissionsofROGorNOXexceed10tonsperyearorifPM10orPM2.5emissionsexceed15tonsperyear(Siongpers.comm.).
SJVAPCD’sthresholdsofsignificanceusedinthisanalysis,asindicatedinitsGuideforAssessingandMitigatingAirQualityImpacts(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002)andthroughconsultationwithSJVAPCDstaff,aresummarizedbelow.
Projectimplementationwouldproduceemissionsincreasesgreaterthan10tons/yearROG.
Projectimplementationwouldproduceemissionsincreasesgreaterthan10tons/yearNOX.
Projectimplementationwouldproduceemissionsincreasesgreaterthan15tons/yearPM10.
Page 19
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐19
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Projectimplementationwouldproduceemissionsincreasesgreaterthan15tons/yearPM2.5
SJVAPCDdoesnothaveestablishedquantitativeCEQAthresholdsforconstructionactivities.Therefore,inlieuofCEQAsignificancethresholdsforconstructionemissions,estimatedemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedbytheproposedprojectsundertheprogramintheSJVABarecomparedtoSJVAPCD’soperationalCEQAthresholdof10tonsperyearforbothNOXandROGand15tonsperyearforbothPM10andPM2.5(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002).UndertheSJVAPCDthresholds,aprojectwouldhaveasignificantshort‐termconstruction‐relatedorlong‐termoperationalairqualityimpactifitwouldexceedSJVAPCD’sthresholdsshowninTable3.3‐6.
Table 3.3‐6. SJVAPCD Thresholds of Significance
Pollutant Construction Operations
ROG – 10tons/year
NOX – 10tons/year
CO – ViolationofCAAQS
PM10(total) – 15tons/year
PM2.5(total) – 15tons/year
Sources:SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2002;Siongpers.comm.CAAQS=CaliforniaAmbientAirQualityStandards.
Impacts and Mitigation Measures
ImpactAQ‐1a‐1:Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificant)
Inordertodeterminethataprojectisconsistentwiththeapplicableairqualityplan,whichinthiscaseistheBayArea2010CleanAirPlan(BayArea2010CAP),itisnecessarytodemonstratethatprogramAlternative1doesnotexceedthepopulationoremploymentgrowthassumptionscontainedintheplan,whichwouldleadtoincreasedvehiclemilestraveledbeyondthoseestimatedintheplan.ImplementationofAlternative1wouldresultinnonewpermanentemployeesrelativetoexistingconditions,norwoulditincreasepopulationprojections.Therefore,Alternative1wouldnotinducepopulationoremploymentgrowthandwouldresultinnonetincreaseinvehiclemilestraveledintheSFBAAB.Alternative1’spotentialimpactsonpopulationandhousingarediscussedinChapter3.12,Population;potentialtransportation‐relatedimpactsarediscussedinSection3.16,Traffic.
Inaddition,althoughshort‐termmitigatedemissionsresultingfromAlternative1constructionwouldexceedtheBAAQMDsignificancethresholdsforROGandNOX(seeImpactAQ‐2a‐1),Alternative1wouldresultinlong‐termbenefitsfromnewrenewablewind‐generatedenergy,includingreductionofROGandNOXemissionsrelativetotheproductionofcomparableenergyfromfossilfuelsources.Thus,Alternative1wouldbeconsistentwiththeBayArea2010CAPregardlessofthisshort‐termimpact.
ItisassumedthattruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSJVABtotheprogramarea.However,SJVAPCDrulesandcleanairplanswouldnotbeapplicabletoAlternative1becausetheprogramareaislocatedintheSFBAAB.Therefore,noconflictwithSJVAPCDcleanairplanswouldoccur.
Page 20
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐20
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactAQ‐1a‐2:Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificant)
Inordertodeterminethataprojectisconsistentwiththeapplicableairqualityplan,whichinthiscaseistheBayArea2010CleanAirPlan(BayArea2010CAP),itisnecessarytodemonstratethatprogramAlternative2doesnotexceedthepopulationoremploymentgrowthassumptionscontainedintheplan,whichwouldleadtoincreasedvehiclemilestraveledbeyondthoseestimatedintheplan.ImplementationofAlternative2wouldresultinnonewpermanentemployeesrelativetoexistingconditions,norwoulditincreasepopulationprojections.Therefore,Alternative2wouldnotinducepopulationoremploymentgrowthandwouldresultinnonetincreaseinvehiclemilestraveledintheSFBAAB.Alternative2’spotentialimpactsonpopulationandhousingarediscussedinChapter3.12,Population;potentialtransportation‐relatedimpactsarediscussedinSection3.16,Traffic.
Inaddition,althoughshort‐termmitigatedemissionsresultingfromAlternative2constructionwouldexceedtheBAAQMDsignificancethresholdsforROGandNOX(seeImpactAQ‐2a‐2),Alternative2wouldresultinlong‐termbenefitsfromnewrenewablewind‐generatedenergy,includingreductionofROGandNOXemissionsrelativetotheproductionofcomparableenergyfromfossilfuelsources.Thus,Alternative2wouldbeconsistentwiththeBayArea2010CAPregardlessofthisshort‐termimpact.
ItisassumedthattruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSJVABtotheprogramarea.However,SJVAPCDrulesandcleanairplanswouldnotbeapplicabletoAlternative2becausetheprogramareaislocatedintheSFBAAB.Therefore,noconflictwithSJVAPCDcleanairplanswouldoccur.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactAQ‐1b:Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificant)
TheimpactfortheGoldenHillsProjectissimilartothatoftheprogram.ImplementationoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldresultinnonewpermanentemployeesrelativetoexistingconditions,norwoulditincreasepopulationprojections.Therefore,theGoldenHillsProjectwouldnotinducepopulationoremploymentgrowthandwouldresultinnonetincreaseinvehiclemilestraveledintheSFBAAB.TheGoldenHillsProject’spotentialimpactsonpopulationandhousingarediscussedinChapter3.12,Population;potentialtransportation‐relatedimpactsarediscussedinSection3.16,Traffic.
Inaddition,althoughshort‐termmitigatedemissionsresultingfromGoldenHillsProjectconstructionwouldexceedtheBAAQMDsignificancethresholdforNOX(seeImpactAQ‐2b),theGoldenHillsProjectwouldresultinlong‐termbenefitsfromnewrenewablewind‐generatedenergy,includingreductionofNOXemissionsrelativetotheproductionofcomparableenergyfromfossilfuelsources.Thus,theGoldenHillsProjectwouldbeconsistentwiththeBayArea2010CAPregardlessofthisshort‐termimpact.
Page 21
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐21
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ItisassumedthattruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSJVABtotheprojectarea.However,SJVAPCDrulesandcleanairplanswouldnotbeapplicabletotheproposedprojectbecausetheprojectareaislocatedintheSFBAAB.Therefore,noconflictwithSJVAPCDcleanairplanswouldoccur.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactAQ‐1c:Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificant)
TheimpactforthePattersonPassProjectissimilartothatoftheprogram.ImplementationofthePattersonPassProjectwouldresultinnonewpermanentemployeesrelativetoexistingconditions,norwoulditincreasepopulationprojections.Therefore,thePattersonPassProjectwouldnotinducepopulationoremploymentgrowthandwouldresultinnonetincreaseinvehiclemilestraveledintheSFBAAB.ThePattersonPassProject’spotentialimpactsonpopulationandhousingarediscussedinChapter3.12,Population;potentialtransportation‐relatedimpactsarediscussedinSection3.16,Traffic.
Inaddition,althoughshort‐termmitigatedemissionsresultingfromPattersonPassProjectconstructionwouldexceedtheBAAQMDsignificancethresholdforNOX(seeImpactAQ‐2c),thePattersonPassProjectwouldresultinlong‐termbenefitsfromnewrenewablewind‐generatedenergy,includingreductionofNOXemissionsrelativetotheproductionofcomparableenergyfromfossilfuelsources.Accordingly,thePattersonPassProjectwouldbeconsistentwiththeBayArea2010CAPregardlessofthisshort‐termimpact.
ItisassumedthattruckstransportingsomecomponentsandaggregatewouldtravelfromthePortofStocktonandthecityofTracythroughportionsoftheSJVABtotheprojectarea.However,SJVAPCDrulesandcleanairplanswouldnotbeapplicabletotheproposedprojectbecausetheprojectareaislocatedintheSFBAAB.Therefore,noconflictwithSJVAPCDcleanairplanswouldoccur.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactAQ‐2a‐1:Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation—programAlternative1:417MW(significantandunavoidable)
Construction Activities
Basedontheassumptionspresentedabove,constructionofthevariousprojectsundertheprogramwouldoccuroveraperiodof9monthsperyearforapproximately4years.Itisestimatedthattherewouldbeapproximately184workdaysperyearthatwouldinvolvetheuseofheavyconstructionequipment.Constructionactivitiesattheprogramareawouldbeassociatedwithdecommissioningandfoundationremovalofexistingturbinesites;laydown,substations,andswitchyards;roadconstruction;turbinefoundationsandbatchplantoperation;turbinedeliveryandinstallation;utilitycollectorlineinstallation;andrestorationandclean‐up.Eachoftheseactivitieswouldoccuroverperiodsthatwouldrangefromapproximately2to4months.Itisestimatedthatasmanyas90piecesofoffroadconstructionequipment,includingcranes,excavators,graders,loaders,cementtrucks,anddozers,wouldberequiredforanaverageof8hoursperdaytoconstructvarious
Page 22
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐22
October 2014ICF 00323.08
projectsundertheprogram.Atanygiventime,from6to54piecesofconstructionequipmentwouldbeoperatingconcurrently,dependingontheconstructionphasing.
Inadditiontotheoffroadequipment,onroadvehicletripswouldberequiredtodelivermaterialsandequipmenttotheconstructionsitesaswellastotransportworkerstoandfromtheconstructionsites(seeChapter2,ProgramDescription,TrafficandParkingsection).Itisanticipatedthatanaverageofapproximately140trucktripsand86commutingworkertripswouldberequiredperdayduringthe9‐monthconstructionperiodforeachyear.Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofequipmentandmaterial‐relatedtrucktripswouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracyandthattheconstructionworker–relatedcommutetripswouldoccurentirelywithintheSFBAAB.Theportionoftheequipment,material,andaggregatehaultripsthatwouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracywouldbegeneratedintheSJVAB,whichisunderSJVAPCD’sjurisdiction.Therefore,theheavy‐dutytrucktripexhaustemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABhavebeenquantifiedandcomparedtoSJVAPCDannualsignificancethresholds(Table3.3‐7).
Table 3.3‐7. Program Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SJVAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions
ConstructionActivity
EstimatedMaximumAnnualUnmitigatedEmissions(tons/year)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Total
PM2.5Total
Offsitetrucktrips 0.28 9.71 1.50 0.02 0.32 0.24
Totalemissions 0.28 9.71 1.50 0.02 0.32 0.24
SJVAPCDsignificancethreshold 10 10 NA NA 15 15
Significantimpact? No No No No No No
CriteriapollutantemissionsofROG,NOX,CO,SO2,PM10,andPM2.5fromconstructionequipmentwouldincrementallyaddtotheregionalatmosphericloadingofthesepollutantsduring constructionofthevariousprojectsundertheprogram.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐8.AsdiscussedaboveunderMethodsforAnalysis,constructionexhaustemissionswereestimatedusingtheCaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel(CalEEMod)(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2011),theEPAEmissionsFactors&AP42CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactorsdocument(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995a,1995b,1995c),andtheARBEMissionFACtors(EMFAC)2011model(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013c).Maximumdailyemissionswerecalculatedfortheperiodoftimewherethegreatestconstructionactivityisanticipatedtooccur.Thistimeperiodinvolvestheoverlapofconstructionphasesincludingdecommissioningandfoundationremoval,roadconstruction,andturbinefoundationsandbatchplant,alongwithoffsitetrucktripsandoffsiteworkertrips.Othernon‐overlappingconstructionphasescontributetoaveragedailyandaverageannualemissions,buttheyarenotcountedascontributingtothemaximumdailyemissionsthatoccurwhenthephaseslistedaboveoverlap.
Page 23
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐23
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.3‐8. Program Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions
ConstructionActivity
EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust
PM10Dust
PM2.5Exhaust
PM2.5Dust
Decommissioningandfoundationremoval
17.02 142.72 53.05 0.19 4.98 7.19 4.94 0.32
Laydown,substationsandswitchyards
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Roadconstruction 16.01 135.03 59.27 0.19 4.80 46.34 4.75 14.66
Turbinefoundationsandbatchplanta
26.74 226.40 96.79 0.31 7.94 24.84 7.82 20.16
Turbinedeliveryandinstallation
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Utilitycollectorlineinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Restorationandcleanup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsitetrucktrips 6.12 124.94 31.85 0.39 3.13 1.20 2.88 0.44
Offsiteworkertrips 0.33 1.49 10.84 0.13 0.01 0.26 0.01 0.10
Totalemissions 66.22 630.59 251.79 1.20 20.87 79.84 20.40 35.69
BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA
SignificantImpact? Yes Yes No No No No No No
Note: Constructionactivitywithzeroemissionsmeansthatthisactivityisnotanticipatedtooccurduringthetimeperiodproducingthemaximumdailyemissionsforconstruction.
a Includesconstructionactivitiesalongwithfugitivedustemissionsfromtheconcretebatchplants.
AsindicatedinTable3.3‐8,maximumdailyunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGandNOXwouldexceedBAAQMD’ssignificancethresholds,resultinginasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldreduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissions.AsindicatedinTable3.3‐7,maximumannualunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGorNOXthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABwouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholds,resultinginaless‐than‐significantimpact.Asnotedabove,althoughtheSJVABisdownwindoftheprojectsiteandsomeemissionsthatareemittedattheprojectsitewithintheSFBAABwouldlikelydriftintotheSJVABduetotransport,theseemissionswerenotquantifiedduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweatherandotherconditionsthatcontributetoemissiontransportanditwouldbespeculativetoquantifytheamountofproject‐relatedemissionsthatwouldtransportintotheSJVAB.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimatednorcomparedtotheSJVAPCD’sthresholds.
Inadditiontoexhaustemissions,emissionsoffugitivedustalsowouldbegeneratedbyprogram‐relatedconstructionactivitiesassociatedwithgradingandearthdisturbance,travelonpavedandunpavedroads,andoperationoftheconcretebatchplantandrockcrusher.Withregardtofugitivedustemissions,theBAAQMDGuidelinesfocusonimplementationofdustcontrolmeasuresratherthancomparingestimatedlevelsoffugitivedusttoquantitativesignificancethresholds.NewandmorecomprehensivefugitivedustcontrolmeasureshavebeenidentifiedbyBAAQMDinits2012guidelines.Therefore,BAAQMD’snewapplicablerecommendedfugitivedustcontrolmeasures,
Page 24
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐24
October 2014ICF 00323.08
whicharecontainedinMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,wouldbeimplementedtoreduceimpactsassociatedwithfugitivedustemissionstoaless‐than‐significantlevel.EventhoughtheBAAQMDGuidelinesdonotrequirethequantificationofconstruction‐relatedfugitivedustemissions,theseemissionswereestimatedforconstructionactivitiesforinformationalpurposesandarepresentedinTable3.3‐8.
IndividualprojectproponentsalsowouldberequiredtoobtainpermitsfromBAAQMDfortheproposedconstruction‐relatedoperationsoftheconcretebatchplantandtherockcrusher.Fugitivesourcesassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldincludethetransferofsandandaggregate,truckloading,mixerloading,vehicletraffic,andwinderosionfromsandandaggregatestoragepiles.Permit stipulationswouldrequiretheuseofBACTs.Permitstipulationswouldlikelyfocusonincreasingmoisturecontentofthematerialsandmayrequiretheuseofwatersprays,enclosures,andbaghousedevices.ImplementationofBAAQMD’sBACTsforbatchplantsandcrushingequipmentwouldensurethatfugitivedustemissionsimpactsthatwouldbeassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldbelessthansignificant.Asnotedabove,stationarysourceemissionsfromfuelcombustionatthebatchplantswerenotestimatedduetolackofdata.AlthoughtheseemissionswouldlikelybeminorafterBACTsareimplemented,theseemissionswouldcontributetothoseestimatedinTables3.3‐9through3.3‐11.
Table 3.3‐9. Program Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions for the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions
OperationalActivity
EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust
PM10Dust
PM2.5Exhaust
PM2.5Dust
Offsiteworkertrips 0.03 0.13 0.96 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.01
Maintenance/operation 3.38 28.05 12.52 0.04 1.15 0.73 1.14 0.04
Totalemissions 3.41 28.18 13.48 0.05 1.15 0.76 1.15 0.05
BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA
Significantimpact? No No No No No No No No
Table 3.3‐10. Program Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions for the SFBAAB—Maximum Annual Unmitigated Emissions
OperationalActivity
EstimatedMaximumAnnualUnmitigatedEmissions(tons/day)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust
PM10Dust
PM2.5Exhaust
PM2.5Dust
Offsiteworkertrips 0.00 0.02 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Maintenance/operation 0.08 0.59 0.42 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.00
Totalemissions 0.08 0.61 0.54 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.00
BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 10 10 NA NA 15 NA 10 NA
Significantimpact? No No No No No No No No
Page 25
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐25
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.3‐11. Program Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Mitigated Emissions
ConstructionActivity
EstimatedMaximumDailyMitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust
PM10Dust
PM2.5Exhaust
PM2.5Dust
Decommissioningandfoundationremoval
17.02 114.18 53.05 0.19 2.74 3.24 2.72 0.15
Laydown,substationsandswitchyards
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Roadconstruction 16.01 108.02 59.27 0.19 2.64 20.85 2.61 6.60
Turbinefoundationsandbatchplanta
26.74 181.12 96.79 0.31 4.37 11.18 4.30 9.07
Turbinedeliveryandinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Utilitycollectorlineinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Restorationandcleanup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsitetrucktrips 6.12 124.94 31.85 0.39 3.13 1.20 2.88 0.44
Offsiteworkertrips 0.33 1.49 10.84 0.13 0.01 0.26 0.01 0.10
Totalemissions 66.22 529.76 251.79 1.20 12.89 36.73 12.52 16.36
BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA
Significantimpact? Yes Yes No No No No No No
Note: Constructionactivitywithzeroemissionsmeansthatthisactivityisnotanticipatedtooccurduringthetimeperiodproducingthemaximumdailyemissionsforconstruction.
a Includesconstructionactivitiesalongwithfugitivedustemissionsfromtheconcretebatchplants.
Operational Activities
Inadditiontoconstruction‐relatedemissions,theprogramwouldalsoresultinoperational‐relatedemissionsassociatedwithturbinemaintenanceactivities,substationoperation,andworkertripstoandfromtheprogramarea.However,dailyandannualemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwithoperationalactivitiesareanticipatedtobethesameundertheprogramasunderexistingcondition;consequently,theywouldnotresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐9;maximumannualunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsarepresentedinTable3.3‐10.
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures
Theprojectproponentswillrequireallcontractorstocomplywiththefollowingrequirementsforallareaswithactiveconstructionactivities.
Allexposedsurfaces(e.g.,parkingareas,stagingareas,soilpiles,gradedareas,andunpavedaccessroads)willbewateredasneededtomaintaindustcontrolonsite—approximatelytwotimesperday.
Page 26
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐26
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Allhaultruckstransportingsoil,sand,orotherloosematerialoffsitewillbecovered.
Allvisiblemudordirttrack‐outontoadjacentpublicroadswillberemovedusingwetpowervacuumstreetsweepersatleastonceperday.Theuseofdrypowersweepingisprohibited.
Allvehiclespeedsonunpavedroadswillbelimitedto15mph.
Allroadways,driveways,andsidewalkstobepavedwillbecompletedassoonaspossible.Buildingpadswillbelaidassoonaspossibleaftergradingunlessseedingorsoilbindersareused.
Idlingtimeswillbeminimizedeitherbyshuttingequipmentoffwhennotinuseorreducingthemaximumidlingtimeto5minutes(asrequiredbytheCaliforniaairbornetoxicscontrolmeasureTitle13,Section2485ofCaliforniaCodeofRegulations[CCR]).Clearsignagewillbeprovidedforconstructionworkersatallaccesspoints.
Allconstructionequipmentwillbemaintainedandproperlytunedinaccordancewithmanufacturer’sspecifications.Allequipmentwillbecheckedbyacertifiedvisibleemissionsevaluator.
Postapubliclyvisiblesignwiththetelephonenumberandpersontocontactattheleadagencyregardingdustcomplaints.Thispersonwillrespondandtakecorrectiveactionwithin48hours.Theairdistrict’sphonenumberwillalsobevisibletoensurecompliancewithapplicableregulations.
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures
Theprojectproponentswillrequireallcontractorstocomplywiththefollowingrequirementsforallareaswithactiveconstructionactivities.
Duringconstructionactivities,allexposedsurfaceswillbewateredatafrequencyadequatetomeetandmaintainfugitivedustcontrolrequirementsofallrelevantairqualitymanagemententities.
Allexcavation,grading,and/ordemolitionactivitieswillbesuspendedwhenaveragewindspeedsexceed20mph,asmeasuredattheLivermoreMunicipalAirport.
Windbreaks(e.g.,trees,fences)willbeinstalledonthewindwardside(s)ofactivelydisturbedareasofconstruction.Windbreaksshouldhaveatmaximum50%airporosity.
Vegetativegroundcover(e.g.,fast‐germinatingnativegrassseed)willbeplantedindisturbedareasassoonaspossibleandwateredappropriatelyuntilvegetationisestablished.
Iffeasibleandpracticable,thesimultaneousoccurrenceofexcavation,grading,andground‐disturbingconstructionactivitiesonthesameareaatanyonetimewillbelimited.
Constructionvehiclesandmachinery,includingtheirtires,willbecleanedpriortoleavingtheconstructionareatoremovevegetationandsoil.Cleaningstationswillbeestablishedattheperimeteroftheconstructionarea.
Page 27
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐27
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Siteaccessestoadistanceof100feetfromthepavedroadwillbetreatedwitha6to12inchcompactedlayerofwoodchips,mulch,orgravel.
Sandbagsorothererosioncontrolmeasureswillbeinstalledtopreventsiltrunofftopublicroadwaysfromsiteswithaslopegreaterthan1%.
Theidlingtimeofdieselpoweredconstructionequipmentwillbeminimizedto2minutes.
Theprojectwilldevelopaplandemonstratingthattheoffroadequipment(morethan50horsepower)tobeusedintheconstructionproject(i.e.,owned,leased,andsubcontractorvehicles)wouldachieveaprojectwidefleet‐average20%NOXreductionand45%PMreductioncomparedtothemostrecentARBfleetaverage.Acceptableoptionsforreducingemissionsincludetheuseoflatemodelengines,low‐emissiondieselproducts,alternativefuels,engineretrofittechnology,after‐treatmentproducts,add‐ondevicessuchasparticulatefilters,and/orotheroptionsassuchbecomeavailable.
UselowVOC(i.e.,ROG)coatingsbeyondthelocalrequirements(i.e.,Regulation8,Rule3:ArchitecturalCoatings).
Allconstructionequipment,dieseltrucks,andgeneratorswillbeequippedwithBACTforemissionreductionsofNOXandPM.
AllcontractorswilluseequipmentthatmeetsARB’smostrecentcertificationstandardforoffroadheavydutydieselengines.
ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldensurethatimpactsrelatedtofugitivedustemissionsintheSFBAABwouldbelessthansignificant.However,implementationofthesemeasureswouldnotreducetotalROGorNOXemissionstoaless‐than‐significantlevel(Table3.3‐11).ThisimpactoftotalROGandNOXemissionswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldnotreducetheonroademissionsintheSJVABshowninTable3.3‐7,buttheseemissionswouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholdsandare,therefore,lessthansignificant.
ImpactAQ‐2a‐2:Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation—programAlternative2:450MW(significantandunavoidable)
Construction Activities
ConstructionofprogramAlternative2wouldoccuroveraperiodofapproximately4years.Itisestimatedthattherewouldbeapproximately184workdaysperyearthatwouldinvolvetheuseofheavyconstructionequipment.Constructionactivitiesintheprojectareawouldincludethesamephases,constructionequipment,andtrucktripsasAlternative1.ItwasassumedthatthedailyconstructionactivitiesforAlternative2wouldnotdifferfromthedailyconstructionactivitiesforAlternative1,althoughtheperiodofconstructionwouldbeslightlylongeroverall.
Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofequipmentandmaterial‐relatedtrucktripswouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracyandthattheconstructionworker‐relatedcommutetripswouldoccurentirelywithintheSFBAAB.Theportionoftheequipment,material,andaggregatehaultripsthatwouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracywouldbegeneratedintheSJVAB,whichisunderSJVAPCD’sjurisdiction.Therefore,theheavy‐dutytrucktripexhaust
Page 28
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐28
October 2014ICF 00323.08
emissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABhavebeenquantifiedandcomparedtoSJVAPCD’sannualsignificancethresholds(Table3.3‐7).
CriteriapollutantemissionsofROG,NOX,CO,SO2,PM10,andPM2.5fromconstructionequipmentwouldincrementallyaddtotheregionalatmosphericloadingofthesepollutantsduring constructionofprogramAlternative2.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABareanticipatedtobeexactlythesameasforalternative1andarepresentedinTable3.3‐8above.Thisisbecausedailyconstructionactivityisanticipatedtobethesameforbothalternatives.Theonlydifferenceinemissionsforthesealternativesistotalemissionsoverthecourseoftheentireconstructionperiod,sinceAlternative1willbeunderconstructionforapproximately50monthsandAlternative2willbeunderconstructionforapproximately54months.
Asdiscussedabove,constructionexhaustemissionswereestimatedusingCalEEMod(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2011),theEPAEmissionsFactors&AP42CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactorsdocument(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995a,1995b,1995c),andtheARBEMFAC2011model(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013c).Thistimeperiodinvolvestheoverlapofconstructionphasesincludingdecommissioningandfoundationremoval,roadconstruction,andturbinefoundationsandbatchplant,alongwithoffsitetrucktripsandoffsiteworkertrips.Othernon‐overlappingconstructionphasescontributetoaveragedailyandaverageannualemissions,buttheyarenotcountedascontributingtothemaximumdailyemissionsthatoccurwhenthephaseslistedaboveoverlap.
AsindicatedinTable3.3‐8above,maximumdailyunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGandNOXwouldexceedBAAQMD’ssignificancethreshold,resultinginasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldreduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissions.AsindicatedinTable3.3‐7above,maximumannualunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGorNOXthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABwouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethreshold,resultinginalessthansignificantimpact.Asnotedabove,althoughtheSJVABisdownwindoftheprogramareaandsomeemissionsthatareemittedintheprogramareawithintheSFBAABwouldlikelydriftintotheSJVABduetotransport,theseemissionswerenotquantifiedduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweatherandotherconditionsthatcontributetoemissiontransportanditwouldbespeculativetoquantifytheamountofproject‐relatedemissionsthatwouldtransportintotheSJVAB.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimatednorcomparedtotheSJVAPCD’sthresholds.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwould,however,reduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsintheSJVAB.
Inadditiontoexhaustemissions,emissionsoffugitivedustalsowouldbegeneratedbyproject‐relatedconstructionactivitiesassociatedwithgradingandearthdisturbance,travelonpavedandunpavedroads,andoperationoftheconcretebatchplantandrockcrusher.Asnotedabove,BAAQMD’snewapplicablerecommendedfugitivedustcontrolmeasures,whicharecontainedinMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,wouldbeimplementedtoreduceimpactsassociatedwithfugitivedustemissionstoaless‐than‐significantlevel.EventhoughtheBAAQMDGuidelinesdonotrequirethequantificationofconstruction‐relatedfugitivedustemissions,theseemissionswereestimatedforconstructionactivitiesforinformationalpurposesandarepresentedinTable3.3‐8.
ProjectproponentsalsowouldberequiredtoobtainpermitsfromBAAQMDfortheproposedconstruction‐relatedoperationsoftheconcretebatchplantandtherockcrusher.Fugitivesourcesassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldincludethetransferofsandandaggregate,truckloading,
Page 29
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐29
October 2014ICF 00323.08
mixerloading,vehicletraffic,andwinderosionfromsandandaggregatestoragepiles.Permit stipulationswouldrequiretheuseofBACTs.Permitstipulationswouldlikelyfocusonincreasingmoisturecontentofthematerialsandmayrequiretheuseofwatersprays,enclosures,andbaghousedevices.ImplementationofBAAQMD’sBACTsforbatchplantsandcrushingequipmentwouldensurethatfugitivedustemissionsimpactsthatwouldbeassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldbelessthansignificant.Asnotedabove,stationarysourceemissionsfromfuelcombustionatthebatchplantswerenotestimatedduetolackofdata.AlthoughtheseemissionswouldlikelybeminorafterBACTsareimplemented,theseemissionswouldcontributetothoseestimatedinTables3.3‐9through3.3‐11above.
Operational Activities
Inadditiontoconstruction‐relatedemissions,theproposedprojectwouldalsoresultinoperational‐relatedemissionsassociatedwithturbinemaintenanceactivities,substationoperation,andworkertripstoandfromtheprojectarea.However,dailyandannualemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwithoperationalactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐9above;maximumannualunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsarepresentedinTable3.3‐11above.
ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldensurethatimpactsrelatedtofugitivedustemissionsintheSFBAABwouldbelessthansignificant.However,implementationofthesemitigationmeasureswouldnotreducetotalNOXemissionstoaless‐than‐significancelevel(Table3.3‐11).ThisimpactoftotalNOXemissionswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldnotreducetheonroademissionsshowninTable3.3‐7,buttheseemissionswouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholdandarethereforelessthansignificant.
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures
ImpactAQ‐2b:Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation—GoldenHillsProject(significantandunavoidable)
Construction Activities
ConstructionoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldoccuroveraperiodofapproximately9months.Itisestimatedthattherewouldbeapproximately184workdaysthatwouldinvolvetheuseofheavyconstructionequipment.Constructionactivitiesintheprojectareawouldincludethesamephases,constructionequipment,andtrucktripsastheprogram.
Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofequipmentandmaterial‐relatedtrucktripswouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracyandthattheconstructionworker‐relatedcommutetripswouldoccurentirelywithintheSFBAAB.Theportionoftheequipment,material,andaggregatehaul
Page 30
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐30
October 2014ICF 00323.08
tripsthatwouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracywouldbegeneratedintheSJVAB,whichisunderSJVAPCD’sjurisdiction.Therefore,theheavy‐dutytrucktripexhaustemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABhavebeenquantifiedandcomparedtoSJVAPCD’sannualsignificancethresholds(Table3.3‐12).
Table 3.3‐12. Golden Hills Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SJVAB— Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions
ConstructionActivity
EstimatedMaximumAnnualUnmitigatedEmissions(tons/year)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Total
PM2.5Total
Offsitetrucktrips 0.25 8.58 1.32 0.01 0.28 0.22
Totalemissions 0.25 8.58 1.32 0.01 0.28 0.22
SJVAPCDsignificancethreshold 10 10 NA NA 15 15
Significantimpact? No No No No No No
CriteriapollutantemissionsofROG,NOX,CO,SO2,PM10,andPM2.5fromconstructionequipmentwouldincrementallyaddtotheregionalatmosphericloadingofthesepollutantsduring constructionoftheGoldenHillsProject.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐13.Asdiscussedabove,constructionexhaustemissionswereestimatedusingCalEEMod(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2011),theEPAEmissionsFactors&AP42CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactorsdocument(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995a,1995b,1995c),andtheARBEMFAC2011model(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013c).Thistimeperiodinvolvestheoverlapofconstructionphasesincludingdecommissioningandfoundationremoval,roadconstruction,andturbinefoundationsandbatchplant,alongwithoffsitetrucktripsandoffsiteworkertrips.Othernon‐overlappingconstructionphasescontributetoaveragedailyandaverageannualemissions,buttheyarenotcountedascontributingtothemaximumdailyemissionsthatoccurwhenthephaseslistedaboveoverlap.
Table 3.3‐13. Golden Hills Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissionswithin the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions
ConstructionActivity
EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust
PM10Dust
PM2.5Exhaust
PM2.5Dust
Decommissioningandfoundationremoval
15.05 126.17 46.89 0.17 4.40 6.36 4.36 0.29
Laydown,substationsandswitchyards
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Roadconstruction 14.16 119.36 52.40 0.16 4.25 40.96 4.20 12.96
Turbinefoundationsandbatchplanta
23.63 200.14 85.56 0.28 7.02 21.96 6.92 17.83
Turbinedeliveryandinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Utilitycollectorlineinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Restorationandcleanup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 31
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐31
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ConstructionActivity EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)
Offsitetrucktrips 5.41 110.45 28.15 0.34 2.77 1.06 2.55 0.39
Offsiteworkertrips 0.29 1.32 9.58 0.11 0.01 0.23 0.01 0.09
Totalemissions 58.53 557.44 222.59 1.07 18.45 70.58 18.04 31.55
BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA
Significantimpact? Yes Yes No No No No No No
Note: Constructionactivitywithzeroemissionsmeansthatthisactivityisnotanticipatedtooccurduringthetimeperiodproducingthemaximumdailyemissionsforconstruction.
a Includesconstructionactivitiesalongwithfugitivedustemissionsfromtheconcretebatchplants.
AsindicatedinTable3.3‐13,maximumdailyunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGandNOXwouldexceedBAAQMD’ssignificancethreshold,resultinginasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldreduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissions.AsindicatedinTable3.3‐12,maximumannualunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGorNOXthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABwouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethreshold,resultinginaless‐than‐significantimpact.Asnotedabove,althoughtheSJVABisdownwindoftheprojectsiteandsomeemissionsthatareemittedattheprojectsitewithintheSFBAABwouldlikelydriftintotheSJVABduetotransport,theseemissionswerenotquantifiedduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweatherandotherconditionsthatcontributetoemissiontransportanditwouldbespeculativetoquantifytheamountofproject‐relatedemissionsthatwouldtransportintotheSJVAB.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimatednorcomparedtotheSJVAPCD’sthresholds.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwould,however,reduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsintheSJVAB.
Inadditiontoexhaustemissions,emissionsoffugitivedustalsowouldbegeneratedbyproject‐relatedconstructionactivitiesassociatedwithgradingandearthdisturbance,travelonpavedandunpavedroads,andoperationoftheconcretebatchplantandrockcrusher.Asnotedabove,BAAQMD’snewapplicablerecommendedfugitivedustcontrolmeasures,whicharecontainedinMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,wouldbeimplementedtoreduceimpactsassociatedwithfugitivedustemissionstoaless‐than‐significantlevel.EventhoughtheBAAQMDGuidelinesdonotrequirethequantificationofconstruction‐relatedfugitivedustemissions,theseemissionswereestimatedforconstructionactivitiesforinformationalpurposesandarepresentedinTable3.3‐13.
ProjectproponentsalsowouldberequiredtoobtainpermitsfromBAAQMDfortheproposedconstruction‐relatedoperationsoftheconcretebatchplantandtherockcrusher.Fugitivesourcesassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldincludethetransferofsandandaggregate,truckloading,mixerloading,vehicletraffic,andwinderosionfromsandandaggregatestoragepiles.Permit stipulationswouldrequiretheuseofBACTs.Permitstipulationswouldlikelyfocusonincreasingmoisturecontentofthematerialsandmayrequiretheuseofwatersprays,enclosures,andbaghousedevices.ImplementationofBAAQMD’sBACTsforbatchplantsandcrushingequipmentwouldensurethatfugitivedustemissionsimpactsthatwouldbeassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldbelessthansignificant.Asnotedabove,stationarysourceemissionsfromfuelcombustionatthebatchplantswerenotestimatedduetolackofdata.AlthoughtheseemissionswouldlikelybeminorafterBACTsareimplemented,theseemissionswouldcontributetothoseestimatedinTables3.3‐14through3.3‐16.
Page 32
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐32
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.3‐14. Golden Hills Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions for the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions
OperationalActivity
EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust
PM10Dust
PM2.5Exhaust
PM2.5Dust
Offsiteworkertrips 0.02 0.12 0.85 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01
Maintenance/operation 2.99 24.79 11.07 0.03 1.02 0.65 1.01 0.03
Totalemissions 3.02 24.91 11.92 0.04 1.02 0.67 1.01 0.04
BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA
Significantimpact? No No No No No No No No
Table 3.3‐15. Golden Hills Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions for the SFBAAB— Maximum Annual Unmitigated Emissions
OperationalActivity
EstimatedMaximumAnnualUnmitigatedEmissions(tons/day)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust
PM10Dust
PM2.5Exhaust
PM2.5Dust
Offsiteworkertrips 0.00 0.02 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Maintenance/operation 0.07 0.52 0.37 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.00
Totalemissions 0.07 0.54 0.48 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.00
BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 10 10 NA NA 15 NA 10 NA
Significantimpact? No No No No No No No No
Table 3.3‐16. Golden Hills Program Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Mitigated Emissions
ConstructionActivity
EstimatedMaximumDailyMitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust
PM10Dust
PM2.5Exhaust
PM2.5Dust
Decommissioningandfoundationremoval
15.05 100.93 46.89 0.17 2.42 2.86 2.40 0.13
Laydown,substationsandswitchyards
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Roadconstruction 14.16 95.49 52.40 0.16 2.34 18.43 2.31 5.83
Turbinefoundationsandbatchplanta
23.63 160.11 85.56 0.28 3.86 9.88 3.80 8.02
Turbinedeliveryandinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Utilitycollectorlineinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Restorationandcleanup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsitetrucktrips 5.41 110.45 28.15 0.34 2.77 1.06 2.55 0.39
Offsiteworkertrips 0.29 1.32 9.58 0.11 0.01 0.23 0.01 0.09
Page 33
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐33
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ConstructionActivity
EstimatedMaximumDailyMitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust
PM10Dust
PM2.5Exhaust
PM2.5Dust
Totalemissions 58.53 468.31 222.59 1.07 11.40 32.47 11.07 14.46
BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA
Significantimpact? Yes Yes No No No No No No
Note: Constructionactivitywithzeroemissionsmeansthatthisactivityisnotanticipatedtooccurduringthetimeperiodproducingthemaximumdailyemissionsforconstruction.
a Includesconstructionactivitiesalongwithfugitivedustemissionsfromtheconcretebatchplants
Operational Activities
Inadditiontoconstruction‐relatedemissions,theproposedprojectwouldalsoresultinoperational‐relatedemissionsassociatedwithturbinemaintenanceactivities,substationoperation,andworkertripstoandfromtheprojectarea.However,dailyandannualemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwithoperationalactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐14;maximumannualunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsarepresentedinTable3.3‐15.
ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldensurethatimpactsrelatedtofugitivedustemissionsintheSFBAABwouldbelessthansignificant.However,implementationofthesemitigationmeasureswouldnotreducetotalNOXemissionstoaless‐than‐significancelevel(Table3.3‐16).ThisimpactoftotalNOXemissionswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldnotreducetheonroademissionsshowninTable3.3‐12,buttheseemissionswouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholdandarethereforelessthansignificant.
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures
ImpactAQ‐2c:Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation—PattersonPassProject(significantandunavoidable)
Construction Activities
ConstructionofthePattersonPassProjectwouldoccuroveraperiodofapproximately9months.Itisestimatedthattherewouldbeapproximately184workdaysthatwouldinvolvetheuseofheavyconstructionequipment.Constructionactivitiesintheprojectareawouldincludethesamephases,constructionequipment,andtrucktripsastheprogram.
Page 34
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐34
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofequipmentandmaterial‐relatedtrucktripswouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracyandthattheconstructionworker‐relatedcommutetripswouldoccurentirelywithintheSFBAAB.Theportionoftheequipment,material,andaggregatehaultripsthatwouldoriginateatthePortofStocktonandinthecityofTracywouldbegeneratedintheSJVAB,whichisunderSJVAPCD’sjurisdiction.Therefore,theheavy‐dutytrucktripexhaustemissionsthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABhavebeenquantifiedandcomparedtoSJVAPCD’sannualsignificancethresholds(Table3.3‐17).
Table 3.3‐17. Patterson Pass Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SJVAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions
ConstructionActivity
EstimatedMaximumAnnualUnmitigatedEmissions(tons/year)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Total
PM2.5Total
Offsitetrucktrips 0.06 1.92 0.30 0.00 0.06 0.05
Totalemissions 0.06 1.92 0.30 0.00 0.06 0.05
SJVAPCDsignificancethreshold 10 10 NA NA 15 15
Significantimpact? No No No No No No
CriteriapollutantemissionsofROG,NOX,CO,SO2,PM10,andPM2.5fromconstructionequipmentwouldincrementallyaddtotheregionalatmosphericloadingofthesepollutantsduring constructionofthePattersonPassProject.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐18.Asdiscussedabove,constructionexhaustemissionswereestimatedusingCalEEMod(SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict2011),theEPAEmissionsFactors&AP42CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactorsdocument(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1995a,1995b,1995c),andtheARBEMFAC2011model(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2013c).Thistimeperiodinvolvestheoverlapofconstructionphasesincludingdecommissioningandfoundationremoval,roadconstruction,andturbinefoundationsandbatchplant,alongwithoffsitetrucktripsandoffsiteworkertrips.Othernon‐overlappingconstructionphasescontributetoaveragedailyandaverageannualemissions,buttheyarenotcountedascontributingtothemaximumdailyemissionsthatoccurwhenthephaseslistedaboveoverlap.
AsindicatedinTable3.3‐18,maximumdailyunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofNOXwouldexceedBAAQMD’ssignificancethreshold,resultinginasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldreduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissions.AsindicatedinTable3.3‐17,maximumannualunmitigatedexhaustemissionsofROGorNOXthatwouldbegeneratedintheSJVABwouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholds,resultinginaless‐than‐significantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwould,however,reduceconstruction‐relatedexhaustemissionsintheSJVAB.Asnotedabove,althoughtheSJVABisdownwindoftheprojectsiteandsomeemissionsthatareemittedattheprojectsitewithintheSFBAABmaydriftintotheSJVABduetotransport,theseemissionswerenotquantifiedduetothehighvariabilityinwindpatternsandlocalweatherandotherconditionsthatcontributetoemissiontransportanditwouldbespeculativetoquantifytheamountofproject‐relatedemissionsthatwouldtransportintotheSJVAB.Therefore,theseemissionswerenotestimatednorcomparedtotheSJVAPCD’sthresholds.
Page 35
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐35
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.3‐18. Patterson Pass Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions
ConstructionActivity
EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust
PM10Dust
PM2.5Exhaust
PM2.5Dust
Decommissioningandfoundationremoval
3.37 28.26 10.50 0.04 0.99 1.42 0.98 0.06
Laydown,substationsandswitchyards
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Roadconstruction 3.17 26.74 11.74 0.04 0.95 9.18 0.94 2.90
Turbinefoundationsandbatchplanta
5.29 44.83 19.16 0.06 1.57 4.92 1.55 3.99
Turbinedeliveryandinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Utilitycollectorlineinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Restorationandcleanup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsitetrucktrips 1.21 24.74 6.31 0.08 0.62 0.24 0.57 0.09
Offsiteworkertrips 0.06 0.30 2.15 0.02 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.02
Totalemissions 13.11 124.86 49.86 0.24 4.13 15.81 4.04 7.07
BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA
Significantimpact? No Yes No No No No No No
Note: Constructionactivitywithzeroemissionsmeansthatthisactivityisnotanticipatedtooccurduringthetimeperiodproducingthemaximumdailyemissionsforconstruction.
a Includesconstructionactivitiesalongwithfugitivedustemissionsfromtheconcretebatchplants.
Inadditiontoexhaustemissions,emissionsoffugitivedustalsowouldbegeneratedbyproject‐relatedconstructionactivitiesassociatedwithgradingandearthdisturbance,travelonpavedandunpavedroads,andoperationoftheconcretebatchplantandrockcrusher.Asnotedabove,BAAQMD’snewapplicablerecommendedfugitivedustcontrolmeasures,whicharecontainedinMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,wouldbeimplementedtoreduceimpactsassociatedwithfugitivedustemissionstoaless‐than‐significantlevel.EventhoughtheBAAQMDGuidelinesdonotrequirethequantificationofconstruction‐relatedfugitivedustemissions,theseemissionswereestimatedforconstructionactivitiesforinformationalpurposesandarepresentedinTable3.3‐18.
TheprojectproponentalsowouldberequiredtoobtainpermitsfromBAAQMDfortheproposedconstruction‐relatedoperationsoftheconcretebatchplantandtherockcrusher.Fugitivesourcesassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldincludethetransferofsandandaggregate,truckloading,mixerloading,vehicletraffic,andwinderosionfromsandandaggregatestoragepiles.Permit stipulationswouldrequiretheuseofBACTs.Permitstipulationswouldlikelyfocusonincreasingmoisturecontentofthematerialsandmayrequiretheuseofwatersprays,enclosures,andbaghousedevices.ImplementationofBAAQMD’sBACTsforbatchplantsandcrushingequipmentwouldensurethatfugitivedustemissionsimpactsthatwouldbeassociatedwiththesefacilitieswouldbelessthansignificant.Asnotedabove,stationarysourceemissionsfromfuelcombustionatthebatchplantswerenotestimatedduetolackofdata.Althoughtheseemissionswouldlikelybe
Page 36
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐36
October 2014ICF 00323.08
minorafterBACTsareimplemented,theseemissionswouldcontributetothoseestimatedinTables3.3‐19through3.3‐21.
Table 3.3‐19. Patterson Pass Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Unmitigated Emissions
OperationalActivity
EstimatedMaximumDailyUnmitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust
PM10Dust
PM2.5Exhaust
PM2.5Dust
Offsiteworkertrips 0.01 0.03 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
Maintenance/operation 0.67 5.55 2.48 0.01 0.23 0.14 0.23 0.01
Totalemissions 0.68 5.58 2.67 0.01 0.23 0.15 0.23 0.01
BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA
Significantimpact? No No No No No No No No
Table 3.3‐20. Patterson Pass Operational Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Annual Unmitigated Emissions
OperationalActivity
EstimatedMaximumAnnualUnmitigatedEmissions(tons/day)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust
PM10Dust
PM2.5Exhaust
PM2.5Dust
Offsiteworkertrips 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Maintenance/operation 0.02 0.12 0.08 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00
Totalemissions 0.02 0.12 0.11 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00
BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 10 10 NA NA 15 NA 10 NA
Significantimpact? No No No No No No No No
Table 3.3‐21. Patterson Pass Construction Exhaust and Fugitive Dust Emissions within the SFBAAB—Maximum Daily Mitigated Emissions
ConstructionActivity
EstimatedMaximumDailyMitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)
ROG NOX CO SO2PM10Exhaust
PM10Dust
PM2.5Exhaust
PM2.5Dust
Decommissioningandfoundationremoval
3.37 22.61 10.50 0.04 0.54 0.64 0.54 0.03
Laydown,substationsandswitchyards
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Roadconstruction 3.17 21.39 11.74 0.04 0.52 4.13 0.52 1.31
Turbinefoundationsandbatchplanta
5.29 35.86 19.16 0.06 0.86 2.21 0.85 1.80
Turbinedeliveryandinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Utilitycollectorlineinstallation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Restorationandcleanup 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsitetrucktrips 1.21 24.74 6.31 0.08 0.62 0.24 0.57 0.09
Offsiteworkertrips 0.06 0.30 2.15 0.02 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.02
Totalemissions 13.11 104.89 49.86 0.24 2.55 7.27 2.48 3.24
Page 37
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐37
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ConstructionActivity EstimatedMaximumDailyMitigatedEmissions(pounds/day)
BAAQMDsignificancethreshold 54 54 NA NA 82 NA 54 NA
Significantimpact? No Yes No No No No No No
Note: Constructionactivitywithzeroemissionsmeansthatthisactivityisnotanticipatedtooccurduringthetimeperiodproducingthemaximumdailyemissionsforconstruction.
a Includesconstructionactivitiesalongwithfugitivedustemissionsfromtheconcretebatchplants
Operational Activities
Inadditiontoconstruction‐relatedemissions,theproposedprojectwouldalsoresultinoperational‐relatedemissionsassociatedwithturbinemaintenanceactivities,substationoperation,andworkertripstoandfromtheprojectarea.However,dailyandannualemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwithoperationalactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.Themaximumdailyunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsthatwouldoccurintheSFBAABhavebeenestimatedandarepresentedinTable3.3‐19;maximumannualunmitigatedoperation‐relatedemissionsarepresentedinTable3.3‐20.
ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldensurethatimpactsrelatedtofugitivedustemissionsintheSFBAABwouldbelessthansignificant.However,implementationofthesemeasureswouldnotreducetotalNOXemissionstoaless‐than‐significancelevel(Table3.3‐21).TheimpactoftotalNOXemissionswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2bwouldnotreducetheonroademissionsshowninTable3.3‐17,buttheseemissionswouldnotexceedSJVAPCD’ssignificancethresholdandare,therefore,lessthansignificant.
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures
ImpactAQ‐3a‐1:Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprojectregionisanonattainmentareaforanapplicablefederalorstateambientairqualitystandard(includingreleasingemissionsthatexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors)—programAlternative1:417MW(significantandunavoidableforconstructionandlessthansignificantforoperation)
OperationofprogramAlternative1wouldnotresultinnewpermanentstationarysourcesofcriteriapollutants,norwoulditincreasecriteriapollutantemissionsfromanyexistingstationarysources.Dependingontheconstructionactivitiesunderwayduringanygivenmonth,from40to150workerswouldbeatthesiteduringconstruction.Nonewpermanentworkerswouldbeemployedundertheprogram.Drive‐byinspectionsandscheduledwindturbinemaintenancewouldcontinuetooccuronadaily,weekly,ormonthlybasisandwouldbeconductedbyexistingtechniciansandoperationspersonnel.Theseactivitieswouldcontinuetobeperformedpertherequirementsoftheequipmentspecificationsandstandardindustrypractice.Dailyemissionsofcriteriapollutants
Page 38
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐38
October 2014ICF 00323.08
associatedwiththeseactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheprogramandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.
However,asnotedabove,projectsthatwouldresultinanincreaseinROG,NOX,PM10,orPM2.5ofmorethantheirrespectiveproject‐leveldailymassthresholdsindicatedinTable3.3‐5wouldalsobeconsideredtocontributeconsiderablytoasignificantcumulativeimpact.BecauseconstructionemissionsofROGandNOXforAlternative1aregreaterthantheBAAQMDthresholdsaftertheimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,(Table3.3‐11),constructionimpactsaresignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures
ImpactAQ‐3a‐2:Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprojectregionisanonattainmentareaforanapplicablefederalorstateambientairqualitystandard(includingreleasingemissionsthatexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors)—programAlternative2:450MW(significantandunavoidableforconstructionandlessthansignificantforoperation)
OperationofprogramAlternative2wouldnotresultinnewpermanentstationarysourcesofcriteriapollutants,norwoulditincreasecriteriapollutantemissionsfromanyexistingstationarysources.Nonewpermanentworkerswouldbeemployedundertheproposedproject.Drive‐byinspectionsandscheduledwindturbinemaintenancewouldcontinuetooccuronadaily,weekly,ormonthlybasisandwouldbeconductedbyexistingtechniciansandoperationspersonnel.Theseactivitieswouldcontinuetobeperformedpertherequirementsoftheequipmentspecificationsandstandardindustrypractice.Dailyemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwiththeseactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.
BecauseconstructionemissionsofROGandNOXforAlternative2wouldbegreaterthantheBAAQMDthresholdsaftertheimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,(Table3.3‐11),constructionimpactswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures
Page 39
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐39
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactAQ‐3b:Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprojectregionisanonattainmentareaforanapplicablefederalorstateambientairqualitystandard(includingreleasingemissionsthatexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors)—GoldenHillsProject(significantandunavoidableforconstructionandlessthansignificantforoperation)
OperationoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldnotresultinnewpermanentstationarysourcesofcriteriapollutants,norwoulditincreasecriteriapollutantemissionsfromanyexistingstationarysources.Nonewpermanentworkerswouldbeemployedundertheproposedproject.Drive‐byinspectionsandscheduledwindturbinemaintenancewouldcontinuetooccuronadaily,weekly,ormonthlybasisandwouldbeconductedbyexistingtechniciansandoperationspersonnel.Theseactivitieswouldcontinuetobeperformedpertherequirementsoftheequipmentspecificationsandstandardindustrypractice.Dailyemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwiththeseactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.
BecauseconstructionemissionsofNOXfortheGoldenHillsProjectwouldbegreaterthantheBAAQMDthresholdsaftertheimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,(Table3.3‐16),constructionimpactswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures
ImpactAQ‐3c:Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprojectregionisanonattainmentareaforanapplicablefederalorstateambientairqualitystandard(includingreleasingemissionsthatexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors)—PattersonPassProject(significantandunavoidableforconstructionandlessthansignificantforoperation)
OperationofthePattersonPassProjectwouldnotresultinnewpermanentstationarysourcesofcriteriapollutants,norwoulditincreasecriteriapollutantemissionsfromanyexistingstationarysources.Nonewpermanentworkerswouldbeemployedundertheproposedproject.Drive‐byinspectionsandscheduledwindturbinemaintenancewouldcontinuetooccuronadaily,weekly,ormonthlybasisandwouldbeconductedbyexistingtechniciansandoperationspersonnel.Theseactivitieswouldcontinuetobeperformedpertherequirementsoftheequipmentspecificationsandstandardindustrypractice.Dailyemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwiththeseactivitiesareanticipatedtobeunchangedundertheproposedprojectandwouldnotbeconsideredtoresultinasignificantcontributiontoexistingairqualityviolations.
BecauseconstructionemissionsofNOXforthePattersonPassProjectwouldbegreaterthantheBAAQMDthresholdsaftertheimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,(Table3.3‐21),constructionimpactswouldbesignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures
Page 40
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐40
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures
ImpactAQ‐4a‐1:Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Long‐termoperationsassociatedwiththeprogramwouldresultinnonewemissions.Constructionactivitieswouldgenerateairpollutantemissions,includingequipmentexhaustemissionsandsuspendedandinhalablePM.However,constructionactivitieswouldoccuroverarelativelyshortperiodofapproximately4years,andassociatedemissionswouldbespatiallydispersedovertheapproximately49,202‐acreprogramarea.Inaddition,theclosestsensitivereceptorstotheprogramareaareacommunityofsingle‐familyresidencesinthecityofLivermorelocatedapproximately4,500feettothewestoftheprogramareaboundaryandtheMountainHousecommunityofsingle‐familyresidences,threeelementaryschoolschildcarefacilities,andparksandopenspaceareas,locatedapproximately5,000feettotheeastoftheprogramareaboundary.TheemissionsmodelingshowsthatamajorityofDPMexhaustemissions(PM10andPM2.5)areassociatedwithturbinefoundationsandbatchplantandoffsitetrucktrips.Thecementbatchplants,whichrepresentastationarysourceofemissions,wouldnotlikelybelocatedattheprogramareaboundary.Assuch,thedistancefromthebatchplantstothenearestsensitivereceptorswouldlikelybegreaterthan4,500feet.Regardingoffsitetrucktrips,thesewouldbetransitoryandwouldoccuronmultipleroadsoverawidespreadarea,therebyhelpingtodispersetoxicpollutantsandminimizeexposure.Therefore,program‐relatedconstructionemissionswouldbesufficientlydilutedatthenearestsensitivereceptorlocations.
WithimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,whichwouldreducebothcriteriapollutantsandtoxicaircontaminantemissionsfromconstructionequipmentandreducethepotentialhealthriskstosensitivereceptors,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures
ImpactAQ‐4a‐2:Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
TheimpactofprogramAlternative2isthesameasforprogramAlternative1.Constructionactivitieswouldoccuroverarelativelyshortperiodofapproximately4years,andassociatedemissionswouldbespatiallydispersedovertheapproximately49,202‐acreprojectarea.WithimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,whichwouldreducebothcriteriapollutantsandtoxicaircontaminantemissionsfromconstructionequipmentandreducethepotentialhealthriskstosensitivereceptors,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures
Page 41
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐41
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures
ImpactAQ‐4b:Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
TheimpactfortheGoldenHillsProjectisthesameasfortheprogram.Constructionactivitiesareanticipatedtolastforonly10months,andassociatedemissionswouldbespatiallydispersedovertheapproximately4,584‐acreprojectarea.WithimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,whichwouldreducebothcriteriapollutantsandtoxicaircontaminantemissionsfromconstructionequipmentandreducethepotentialhealthriskstosensitivereceptors,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures
ImpactAQ‐4c:Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
TheimpactforthePattersonPassProjectisthesameasfortheprogram.Constructionactivitiesareanticipatedtolastforonly10months,andassociatedemissionswouldbespatiallydispersedovertheapproximately945‐acreprojectarea.WithimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAQ‐2aandAQ‐2b,whichwouldreducebothcriteriapollutantsandtoxicaircontaminantemissionsfromconstructionequipmentandreducethepotentialhealthriskstosensitivereceptors,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2a:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingapplicableBAAQMDBasicConstructionMitigationMeasures
MitigationMeasureAQ‐2b:Reduceconstruction‐relatedairpollutantemissionsbyimplementingmeasuresbasedonBAAQMD’sAdditionalConstructionMitigationMeasures
ImpactAQ‐5a‐1:Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificant)
Typicalodorsourcesofconcernincludewastewatertreatmentplants,sanitarylandfills,transferstations,compostingfacilities,petroleumrefineries,asphaltbatchplants,chemicalmanufacturingfacilities,animalfeedlots,fiberglassmanufacturingfacilities,autobodyshops,andrenderingplants.Theprogramwouldresultinthedevelopmentofnewwindturbinegeneratorsthatwouldnotresultinobjectionableodors.Althoughprogramconstructionwouldinvolvetheuseofdieselequipmentandatemporarybatchplantthatcouldresultinthecreationofodors,theconstructionactivitieswouldbetemporary(approximately5years),spatiallydispersedoverthe49,202‐acreprogram
Page 42
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐42
October 2014ICF 00323.08
area,andwouldtakeplaceinareasthatarenotinthevicinityofsensitivereceptors.Therefore,theprogramwouldnotaffectasubstantialnumberofpeople.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactAQ‐5a‐2:Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificant)
TheimpactforprogramAlternative2isthesameasforprogramAlternative1.Althoughprojectconstructionwouldinvolvetheuseofdieselequipmentandatemporarybatchplantthatcouldresultinthecreationofodors,theconstructionactivitieswouldbetemporary(approximately4years),spatiallydispersedoverthe49,202‐acreprojectarea,andwouldtakeplaceinareasthatarenotinthevicinityofsensitivereceptors.Therefore,theproposedprojectwouldnotaffectasubstantialnumberofpeople.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactAQ‐5b:Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificant)
TheimpactfortheGoldenHillsProjectisthesameasfortheprogram.Althoughprojectconstructionwouldinvolvetheuseofdieselequipmentandatemporarybatchplantthatcouldresultinthecreationofodors,theconstructionactivitieswouldbetemporary(approximately10months),spatiallydispersedoverthe4,584‐acreprojectarea,andwouldtakeplaceinareasthatarenotinthevicinityofsensitivereceptors.Therefore,theproposedprojectwouldnotaffectasubstantialnumberofpeople.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactAQ‐5c:Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificant)
TheimpactforthePattersonPassProjectisthesameasfortheprogram.Althoughprojectconstructionwouldinvolvetheuseofdieselequipmentandatemporarybatchplantthatcouldresultinthecreationofodors,theconstructionactivitieswouldbetemporary(approximately10months),spatiallydispersedoverthe945‐acreprojectarea,andwouldtakeplaceinareasthatarenotinthevicinityofsensitivereceptors.Therefore,theproposedprojectwouldnotaffectasubstantialnumberofpeople.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
Cumulative Analysis
CumulativeimpactsrelatedtoairqualityareaddressedinImpactsAQ‐3a‐1,AQ‐3a‐2,AQ‐3b,andAQ‐3c.Impactswouldbesignificantandunavoidableforconstructionandlessthansignificantforoperation.
Page 43
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐43
October 2014ICF 00323.08
3.3.3 References Cited
Printed References
AlamedaCounty.1998.DraftEnvironmentalImpactReport—RepoweringaPortionoftheAltamontPassWindResourceArea.August.StateClearinghouse#98022024.Hayward,CA:AlamedaCountyCommunityDevelopmentAgency.
———.2000.EastCountyAreaPlan.AdoptedMay1994.ModifiedbypassageofMeasureD,effectiveDecember22,2000.Oakland,CA.
BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict.2010.BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict—LivermoreValley.Available:http://www.baaqmd.gov/Divisions/Communications‐and‐Outreach/Air‐Quality‐in‐the‐Bay‐Area/Bay‐Area‐Climatology/Subregions/Livermore‐Valley.aspx.LastUpdated:October4,2010.Accessed:June26,2013.
———.2011.CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityActAirQualityGuidelines.Available:http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/Files/Planning%20and%20Research/CEQA/BAAQMD%20CEQA%20Guidelines%20May%202011.ashx.LastUpdated:May2011.Accessed:July10,2013.
———.2012.CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityActAirQualityGuidelines.Available:http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/Files/Planning%20and%20Research/CEQA/BAAQMD%20CEQA%20Guidelines_Final_May%202012.ashx?la=en.LastUpdated:May2012.Accessed:July10,2013.
CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard.1998.FindingsoftheScientificReviewontheReportonDieselExhaust.AdoptedApril22.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/dieseltac/combined.pdf.Accessed:April8,2013.
———.2000.RiskReductionPlantoReduceParticulateMatterEmissionsfromDiesel‐FueledEnginesandVehicles.Sacramento,CA.PreparedbyStationarySourceDivisionandMobileSourceControlDivision.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/diesel/documents/rrpfinal.pdf.Accessed:June27,2013.
———.2009.TheCaliforniaAlmanacofEmissionsandAirQuality–2009Edition.Chapter4:AirBasinTrendsandForecasts‐‐CriteriaPollutants.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/aqd/almanac/almanac09/pdf/chap409.pdf.Accessed:February12,2014.
———.2011.AreaDesignationsMaps.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm.Accessed:June26,2013.
———.2013a.AmbientAirQualityStandards.June.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf.Accessed:June26,2013.
———.2013b.Top4Summary:Pollutant/YearRangeSelection.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/topfour/topfour1.php.Accessed:June26,2013.
———.2013c.EmissionFactorModel(EMFAC)2011.Available:http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/modeling.htm.Accessed:June9,2013.
Page 44
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐44
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ContraCostaCounty.2010.VascoWindsRepoweringProject DraftEnvironmentalImpactReportandAppendices.December.Available:http://www.co.contra‐costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/5349.Accessed:July10,2010.
SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict.2002.GuideforAssessingandMitigatingAirQualityImpacts.LastRevised:January10,2002.Available:http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/CEQA%20Rules/GAMAQI%20Jan%202002%20Rev.pdf.Accessed:July18,2013.
———.2013.AmbientAirQualityStandardsandValleyAttainmentStatus.Available:http://www.valleyair.org/aqinfo/attainment.htm.Accessed:July18,2013.
SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict.2006.ParticulateMatter(PM)2.5SignificanceThresholdsandCalculationMethodology.AppendixA—UpdatedCEIDARSTablewithPM2.5Fractions.Available:http://www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/handbook/PM2_5/PM2_5.html.Accessed:July10,2013.
———.2011.CaliforniaEmissionEstimatorModel(CalEEMod).User’sGuideVersion2011.1—AppendixDDefaultDataTables—Table3.4.DevelopedbyENVIRONInternationalCorporationincollaborationwithSCAQMDandotherCaliforniaAirDistricts.Available:http://www.caleemod.com/.Accessed:October4,2011.
U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency.1995a.AP42,CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactors,Volume1:StationaryPointandAreaSources.FifthEdition.Chapter3.3,GasolineandDieselIndustrialEngines.Available:http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch03/final/c03s03.pdf.Accessed:July9,2013.
———.1995b.AP42,CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactors.FifthEdition.Section11.9,WesternSurfaceCoalMining.AsCitedinCalEEModUserGuide(2011),AppendixA(page8).Available:http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch11/final/c11s09.pdf.Accessed:July9,2013.
———.1995c.AP42,CompilationofAirPollutantEmissionFactors.FifthEdition.Section11.12,ConcreteBatching.Available:http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch11/final/c11s12.pdf.Accessed:July10,2013.
———.2012.TheGreenBookNonattainmentAreasforCriteriaPollutants.LastRevised:December14,2012.Available:http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/greenbk/.Accessed:June27,2013.
———.2013a.NitrogenDioxide.LastUpdated:April4,2013.Available:http://www.epa.gov/airquality/nitrogenoxides/.Accessed:June26,2013.
———.2013b.Health|NitrogenDioxide.LastUpdated:February14,2013.Available:http://www.epa.gov/airquality/nitrogenoxides/health.html.Accessed:June26,2013.
WesternRegionalClimateCenter.2013.PeriodofRecordMonthlyClimateSummariesforLivermore,California.Available:http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi‐bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca4997.Accessed:June26,2013.
Page 45
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Air Quality
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.3‐45
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Personal Communications
Kirk,Alison.SeniorEnvironmentalPlanner,BayAreaAirQualityManagementDistrict,PlanningandResearchDivision.August31,2011—emaildescribingtheintentoftheBAAQMDdailyconstructionemissionsthresholds.
Siong,Patia.AirQualityPlanner,SanJoaquinValleyUnifiedAirPollutionControlDistrict.May23,2011—emailtoShannonHatcherregardingconstructionthresholds.