Top Banner
2030 MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014
14

2030 MARKET OUTLOOK - Metering.com MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK 20 JUNE 2014 © Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015 No portion of this document may be reproduced,

Mar 11, 2018

Download

Documents

vominh
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK - Metering.com MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK 20 JUNE 2014 © Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015 No portion of this document may be reproduced,

2030 MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific

20 June 2014

Page 2: 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK - Metering.com MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK 20 JUNE 2014 © Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015 No portion of this document may be reproduced,

2030 MARKET OUTLOOK

20 JUNE 2014

© Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015

No portion of this document may be reproduced, scanned into an electronic system, distributed, publicly displayed or used as the basis of derivative works without the prior written consent of Bloomberg Finance L.P. For more information on terms of use, please contact [email protected]. Copyright and Disclaimer notice on page 5 applies throughout.

ABOUT US This white paper is an abridged version on the Asia Pacific region of our global long-term forecast

to 2030.

A full version of this report is available for Bloomberg New Energy Finance clients and is updated

annually. Bloomberg New Energy Finance is currently working on our global long-term forecast to

2040, due to be published in H2 2015.

Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) provides unique analysis, tools and data for decision

makers driving change in the energy system. BNEF has 200 staff based in 14 offices around the

world. BNEF’s sectoral products provide financial, economic and policy analysis, as well as news

and the world’s most comprehensive database of assets, investments, companies and equipment

in the clean energy space. BNEF’s regional products provide a comprehensive view on the

transformation of the energy system by region.

Visit us at http://about.bnef.com or contact us at [email protected] for more information.

© Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015. This publication is the copyright of Bloomberg New Energy

Finance. No portion of this document may be photocopied, reproduced, scanned into an

electronic system or transmitted, forwarded or distributed in any way without prior consent of

Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

Copyright

Page 3: 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK - Metering.com MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK 20 JUNE 2014 © Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015 No portion of this document may be reproduced,

2030 MARKET OUTLOOK

20 JUNE 2014

© Bloomberg Finance L.P.2014

No portion of this document may be reproduced, scanned into an electronic system, distributed, publicly displayed or used as the basis of derivative works without the prior written consent of Bloomberg Finance L.P. For more information on terms of use, please contact [email protected]. Copyright and Disclaimer notice on page 56 applies throughout. Page 1 of 52

SECTION 1. ASIA PACIFIC The Asia Pacific region has become the centre of global energy growth. Until

2030 it will add as much power capacity as the rest of the world combined.

Renewables will play a key role, attracting two-thirds of investment or an

average of $252bn a year. By 2030 we anticipate that 47% of installed power

capacity and 33% of electricity generated will be from renewable sources.

• Onshore wind is already competitive with natural gas and coal at good sites as will PV

without subsidy before 2020. At the best wind sites, the levelised cost of electricity (LCOE)

can be as low as $67-76/MWh in countries such as China, India and Australia compared with

gas at $61-94/MWh. PV is currently around $83-115/MWh in sunny locations (excluding

Japan), putting it at retail price parity in places with high power tariffs. With more cost

reductions on the cards, the PV LCOE could go as low as $77-90/MWh by 2020.

• The future is mostly about PV driven by its increased competitiveness, and modular

and distributed nature. By 2030, renewable capacity including hydro is projected to

increase almost fourfold, with 1,733GW added of which 803GW PV (46%) and 497GW

onshore and offshore wind (29%) (Figure 1). PV is split almost equally between rooftop (53%)

and utility-scale (47%) capacity. But Asia Pacific is a far larger opportunity for utility-scale PV

in countries such as China and India than for example the EU where 94% of new PV is small-

scale.

• The capital-intensive nature of renewables ensures that they will attract $2.35 trillion

up to 2026 – or two-thirds of all investment in Asia Pacific power generation. PV will

require $63bn and wind $39bn a year on average – 7% and 11% more than their 2013

investments respectively. Investment figures only run until 2026 to take into account a four-

year lag between funds committed and capacity constructed.

• New fossil fuel assets are shifting to gas but high liquefied natural gas (LNG) prices

are preventing a full-scale gas revolution. Asia Pacific will more than double its gas

capacity by adding 283GW up to 2030, but coal will still install more at 434GW – the

equivalent of a new coal plant every two weeks. Only much lower gas prices and higher

environmental costs for coal would shift the balance further from coal to gas.

Figure 1: Asia Pacific installed capacity 2012 and 2030 and projected capacity additions, by technology (GW)

2012 Annual capacity additions, 2013-30 (GW) 2030

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

2013 2015 2020 2025 2030

Fossil fuels Nuclear Solar

Wind Other renewables Flexible capacity

Page 4: 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK - Metering.com MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK 20 JUNE 2014 © Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015 No portion of this document may be reproduced,

2030 MARKET OUTLOOK

20 JUNE 2014

© Bloomberg Finance L.P.2014

No portion of this document may be reproduced, scanned into an electronic system, distributed, publicly displayed or used as the basis of derivative works without the prior written consent of Bloomberg Finance L.P. For more information on terms of use, please contact [email protected]. Copyright and Disclaimer notice on page 56 applies throughout. Page 2 of 52

1.1. POLICY

The Asia Pacific energy landscape consists of a wide variety of approaches to policy and

regulation. Australia has a well-functioning, fully liberalised power market; India has a semi-

liberalised market dominated by state-owned entities; in China, the government controls and

regulates the power market closely but is considering ways to liberalise it; and Japan still has a

regionalised, fully vertically integrated utility model but this is also due to change over the next

decade. The Appendix captures policies that partially drive power forecasts presented in this

report.

Many policies affect the way in which these power sectors will develop, but each country has key

drivers that will push it in a specific direction:

• Australia is facing a changing political environment and a power market in flux. The current

government has vowed to remove the country’s carbon price and has suggested the national

renewable target could be reduced, resulting in a high degree of policy uncertainty for

investors and operators. At the same time, electricity demand growth is negative and at best

stable, and an influx of economic residential PV is changing the power generation landscape.

• China has an ever-expanding need for power given its strong economic growth. Its objective

is to meet this need in the most cost-effective manner without jeopardising its energy security

or damaging the local environment – as evidenced by the government’s recent declaration of

a ‘war on pollution’. In addition, China manufactures over 90% of global supply of PV

modules and 53% of wind turbines so it is incentivised to assist these segments of the

domestic economy.

• India is facing continued demand growth as well as a burgeoning population without basic

electricity supply. Thus, its main objective is to deliver as much power as possible at the

lowest cost. However, power project investments are lagging considerably due to artificially

low electricity prices, many near-bankrupt distribution companies, and complex and inefficient

bureaucracy.

• Japan is grappling with the consequences of the 2011 nuclear disaster in Fukushima. The

country is trying to restart some of its nuclear facilities in the face of public opposition as well

as replace it with more renewable and gas capacity. At the same time, the government is

aiming to reform its inefficient power sector though this will take many years to implement and

is unlikely to be completed before the next decade.

• Southeast Asia is looking at a very similar power environment as India, with strong electricity

demand growth and many challenges relating to the development of power projects. Fuel

cost is one of the key drivers for future capacity, with coal being the cheapest and gas

increasingly expensive as the region turns from being an LNG exporter to an importer.

Southeast Asia is also relatively unambitious regarding renewables.

• South Korea’s power outlook is highly uncertain as the government has not created an

achievable long-term energy plan. It aims to increase coal capacity, but it has a target to

reduce the country’s emissions 19% below 2010 levels by 2020. In addition, it aims to reduce

the share of nuclear, but is expecting less LNG-fired generation and does not have an

effective renewable policy in place that will accelerate development similar to for example

Japan and China.

As a result of these drivers – including energy security, air pollution, high gas prices, nuclear

safety and to some extent climate change – many countries have started to look at renewables as

an important source of generation. Many still support the industry through feed-in tariffs (China,

Japan, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, Indonesia, and some Indian provinces), dedicated

capacity auctions (India), and renewable portfolio standards (Australia, South Korea). These

Many policies affect the

way that the power

sectors in Asia Pacific

countries will develop,

but each country has

key drivers that will

push it in a specific

direction.

Page 5: 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK - Metering.com MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK 20 JUNE 2014 © Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015 No portion of this document may be reproduced,

2030 MARKET OUTLOOK

20 JUNE 2014

© Bloomberg Finance L.P.2014

No portion of this document may be reproduced, scanned into an electronic system, distributed, publicly displayed or used as the basis of derivative works without the prior written consent of Bloomberg Finance L.P. For more information on terms of use, please contact [email protected]. Copyright and Disclaimer notice on page 56 applies throughout. Page 3 of 52

incentives and mandates are important to propel renewables into the power mix. However,

development is also increasingly taking place outside these policies for purely economic reasons,

such as distributed PV in Australia, own-use, captive generation in India or off-grid deployment.

1.2. ECONOMICS

In the short to medium term, our capacity forecast is determined by both the visible pipeline of

projects and policy targets. But over the long term, economics shape the mix of new build.

At present renewables remain generally more expensive than coal and gas – outside areas with

high insolation or wind speeds. But we anticipate a significant reduction in technology costs for

renewables by 2030, enabling these energy sources to gradually move away from the need for

subsidies to compete directly with fossil fuel plants (Figure 2).

UTILITY-SCALE PLANTS

The lowest-cost renewable projects are located in the sites with the best resources.

Consequently, the range shown for solar and wind is mostly dependent on capacity factors, while

that for coal and gas is dependent on future fuel price scenarios.

Figure 2: Asia Pacific LCOE ($/MWh nominal)

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Note: Capacity factor – onshore wind: 15-35%; solar PV: 10-20%.

Specifically we find that:

• Natural gas power is most expensive in regions that are significantly dependent on LNG. In

April 2014, LNG prices in Northeast Asia were $15-17/MMBtu. This results in an LCOE for

gas as high as $137/MWh in Japan, for example. Though more LNG supply will come online

and reduce prices later this decade, the marginal gas LCOE will remain above $140/MWh if

LNG is used. For countries with other sources of supply (Australia, China) the LCOE can be

as low as $63/MWh.

• The coal LCOE has a very wide range depending on the country’s source of coal and

inclusion of environmental costs. Currently, it can be as low as $40/MWh in China and as

high as $107/MWh in Japan or even $85-129/MWh in Australia where an on-and-off-again

carbon policy has dramatically increased the cost of financing if it is possible to obtain at all.

Over time we expect the coal LCOEs for Australia, Japan and China to converge around

$133-137/MWh as China is expected to impose similar environmental constraints (eg, high-

quality coal, carbon price, scrubbers) as the other two. India and Southeast Asia will remain

as low as $60-81/MWh in 2030 unless they take similar environmental measures as China.

• The costs of onshore wind have declined significantly over the past decade and in many

countries the technology can now directly compete with other fuels such as coal and gas. In

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2013 2020 2025 2030

Coal

Natural gas

Onshore wind

Solar PV

By 2020 PV and wind in

the best locations will

cost around $70-112/

MWh and $56-166/MWh

respectively – broadly

competitive with coal at

$57-131/MWh and gas at

$60-143/MWh.

Page 6: 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK - Metering.com MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK 20 JUNE 2014 © Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015 No portion of this document may be reproduced,

2030 MARKET OUTLOOK

20 JUNE 2014

© Bloomberg Finance L.P.2014

No portion of this document may be reproduced, scanned into an electronic system, distributed, publicly displayed or used as the basis of derivative works without the prior written consent of Bloomberg Finance L.P. For more information on terms of use, please contact [email protected]. Copyright and Disclaimer notice on page 56 applies throughout. Page 4 of 52

the best sites the LCOE can be as low as $67-72/MWh in China, India and Australia. Even at

less advantageous sites, the LCOE in these countries is expected to come down from $97-

123/MWh to $84-112/MWh by 2020 through technological advances and experience.

Southeast Asia and Japan are at the high end of the range due to low wind speeds,

transmission constraints and logistical challenges such as limited infrastructure.

• PV remains one of the more expensive generation technologies, despite the 70% decline in

module costs over the past three years. Nevertheless, in areas with good insolation, the

current LCOE of $83-115/MWh in countries such as Australia, China and India already makes

it competitive with coal if high environmental costs are imposed and with gas if LNG is

required. Since there are still significantly more cost reductions to come for PV in contrast to

the other technologies, it will be a fully competitive source in only six years (2020) in much of

the region. The LCOE will be as low as $70-112/MWh or as high as $94-167/MWh depending

on the solar resource. Similar to wind, PV in Southeast Asia is more expensive due to lower

insolation levels and Japan is at the top end because of the current high feed-in tariff.

Box 1: A range of levelised costs

Figure 3: China solar PV LCOE range ($/MWh) Figure 4: China onshore wind LCOE range ($/MWh)

Figure 5: China CCGT LCOE range ($/MWh) This forecast is driven by a combination of project pipelines,

near-term policy targets and energy economics. New capacity

is policy driven where legislation is already in place. Where a

policy does not exist, and/or beyond 2020, new build is

primarily determined by local supply-demand economics.

Demand for new power generation is met by a range of

technologies, heavily weighted towards those with the lowest

lifetime costs on a levelised basis. To capture the uncertainty

when looking forward over more than 15 years, we have flexed

technology, operational and financing costs around our central

view. Combined, these build a set of LCOE cost projections

that create a range of renewable energy build (Appendix C:).

These three figures show our central forecast between our

upper and lower projections utility-scale solar, onshore wind

and combined-cycle natural gas in China. See Box 2 for the

implications of these LCOE ranges for capacity build.

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Note: Capacity factors – solar PV: 15-20%; onshore wind: 19-24%. Gas LCOE does not include carbon

price.

0

50

100

150

200

250

2013 2015 2020 2025 2030

0

50

100

150

200

250

2013 2015 2020 2025 2030

0

50

100

150

200

250

2013 2015 2020 2025 2030

Page 7: 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK - Metering.com MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK 20 JUNE 2014 © Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015 No portion of this document may be reproduced,

2030 MARKET OUTLOOK

20 JUNE 2014

© Bloomberg Finance L.P.2014

No portion of this document may be reproduced, scanned into an electronic system, distributed, publicly displayed or used as the basis of derivative works without the prior written consent of Bloomberg Finance L.P. For more information on terms of use, please contact [email protected]. Copyright and Disclaimer notice on page 56 applies throughout. Page 5 of 52

SMALL-SCALE PV

A major advantage of PV is that it not only competes on a wholesale level as described above,

but also at a retail level. Unlike utility-scale projects, consumer uptake of small-scale PV is driven

both by its economics and its existing market penetration.1 In other words, as more small-scale

systems are installed, there is a positive feedback effect that can drive exponential growth in

uptake. This phenomenon can also be seen in the mobile phone and other consumer markets.

Because of major cost reductions for modules, residential PV has now become economic in many

countries. Consumers can make a return on investment above 6% (real) by installing a PV system

and operating it for the 25-year lifetime to replace electricity from the grid. In Asia Pacific, this

currently holds for Australia and Japan and by 2025 this will be the case for South Korea, and

parts of China and India as well (Figure 6).

In some countries, a 6% real rate of return may not be attractive to consumers, and without net

metering legislation, consumers may be unable to use every kWh generated by the system in-

house. It is clear that in many countries installing PV will save households and businesses

money, and parts of Europe and the Americas have already begun to see uptake of unsubsidised

PV systems. We expect this to spread as the equipment becomes cheaper, despite expected

opposition from utilities and changing rate structures for consumers. The first signs of this

opposition can already be observed, however: in parts of Europe and the Americas with

significant penetration of rooftop PV: for example, the Spanish government has recently

threatened to impose a tax on electricity generated for auto-consumption, although the final bill is

still pending.

Figure 6: Asia Pacific residential-scale PV system economics

2014 2025

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance

1 Small-scale PV is PV deployed on rooftops as opposed to ground-mounted systems. Their size can vary

from small residential to large commercial systems.

Page 8: 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK - Metering.com MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK 20 JUNE 2014 © Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015 No portion of this document may be reproduced,

2030 MARKET OUTLOOK

20 JUNE 2014

© Bloomberg Finance L.P.2014

No portion of this document may be reproduced, scanned into an electronic system, distributed, publicly displayed or used as the basis of derivative works without the prior written consent of Bloomberg Finance L.P. For more information on terms of use, please contact [email protected]. Copyright and Disclaimer notice on page 56 applies throughout. Page 6 of 52

1.3. CAPACITY

DEMAND

Electricity demand in Asia Pacific is expected to grow in line with economic expansion, population

increase and changing consumption patterns. Average GDP growth across the region’s major

economies was around 9% over the past decade and we assume that this will reduce to an

average of 5.5% as most countries mature and China’s growth slows down.

FORECAST

Our short-term capacity forecast is rooted in plant-level announcements of planned new build,

retrofits and retirements. We supplement these with our own top-down projections over the long

term for particular technologies.

Asia Pacific will see its installed power capacity base more than double to 4,773GW in 2030 from

2,101GW in 2012, in order to meet the significant increase in electricity demand (Figure 7). This

will require capacity build of 1,198GW until 2020 – more than the current installed capacity in the

US – and 2,672GW by 2030. Our short-term capacity forecast is rooted in plant-level

announcements of planned new build, retrofits and retirements. We supplement these with our

own top-down projections over the long term for particular technologies.

Figure 7: Asia-Pacific cumulative installed capacity by technology, 2012-30 (GW)

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance

China will dominate the regional build until 2030 as it adds 56% (1,536GW) of new capacity

(Figure 8). India follows with half the expected build (675GW) though this only really ramps up

after the end of this decade. Southeast Asia is also an important growth area with 233GW of new

build. Japan will likely add 116GW through its strong renewables push over the next few years. It

– like Australia – is likely to see ongoing uptake of small-scale PV beyond the lifetime of current

policy.

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

2012 2015 2020 2025 2030

Flexible capacity

Solar thermal

Small-scale PV

Utility-scale PV

Offshore wind

Onshore wind

Biomass

Geothermal

Hydro

Nuclear

Other

Gas

Oil

Coal

Page 9: 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK - Metering.com MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK 20 JUNE 2014 © Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015 No portion of this document may be reproduced,

2030 MARKET OUTLOOK

20 JUNE 2014

© Bloomberg Finance L.P.2014

No portion of this document may be reproduced, scanned into an electronic system, distributed, publicly displayed or used as the basis of derivative works without the prior written consent of Bloomberg Finance L.P. For more information on terms of use, please contact [email protected]. Copyright and Disclaimer notice on page 56 applies throughout. Page 7 of 52

Figure 8: Gross capacity additions by country/region and by technology, 2013-30 (GW)

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Note: This figure does not include the capacity additions elsewhere

in Asia Pacific, nor does it include other and flexible capacity, as well as retirements.

In terms of technologies, renewables dominate over fossil fuel sources and will add 1,743GW

over 2013-30, representing 65% of the total power additions. This is split between 804GW of PV,

502GW wind and 437GW hydro, geothermal and biomass & waste (Figure 9 and Figure 10). Coal

will remain an important component of the power mix for China, India and Southeast Asia, but its

share will gradually shrink as the significance of local air pollution and climate change as well as

the competitiveness of renewable technologies crowd out further investment. Although Japan and

South Korea have several coal plants under construction or planned, this is expected to be a

temporary phenomenon on the back of an urgent lack of power supply, high gas prices, no added

carbon costs and few immediate cost-effective alternatives.

Figure 9: Asia Pacific gross annual renewable capacity

additions (excl. hydro) by country, 2013-30 (GW)

Figure 10: Asia Pacific gross capacity additions by

technology, 2013-30 (GW)

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance Note: Figure excludes retirements.

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600

Australia

S. Korea

Japan

SE Asia

India

China

Solar Fossil fuels Wind Other renewables Nuclear

1,536

675

233

116

77

36

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

2013 2015 2020 2025 2030

Australia

South Korea

SE Asia

India

Japan

China

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

20132015 2020 2025 2030

Flexible capacity

Solar thermal

Small-scale PV

Utility-scale PV

Offshore wind

Onshore wind

Biomass

Geothermal

Hydro

Nuclear

Gas

Oil

Coal

Asia Pacific will likely

build 1,733GW of

renewable capacity by

2030 – two-thirds of total

additions – of which

803GW will be PV and

497GW wind.

Coal will add 434GW and

gas 283GW.

Page 10: 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK - Metering.com MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK 20 JUNE 2014 © Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015 No portion of this document may be reproduced,

2030 MARKET OUTLOOK

20 JUNE 2014

© Bloomberg Finance L.P.2014

No portion of this document may be reproduced, scanned into an electronic system, distributed, publicly displayed or used as the basis of derivative works without the prior written consent of Bloomberg Finance L.P. For more information on terms of use, please contact [email protected]. Copyright and Disclaimer notice on page 56 applies throughout. Page 8 of 52

Box 2: A range of capacity build

The lower the cost of renewables, the greater the share of these technologies in the future

Asia Pacific power mix (Figure 11). In particular lower costs will directly influence the amount of

utility-scale PV plants, resulting in a cumulative total as high as 513GW for the technology by

2030 versus 382GW in our central view. Perhaps somewhat counterintuitively, low renewables

is also likely to result in more gas capacity to support supply in times of peak demand. In

contrast, growing carbon risk would increase financing costs for coal, reducing its share of total

capacity to 30% compared with 33% in our central view. Higher renewable costs however

would see coal increase its share to 36%, to the detriment of renewables.

Figure 11: Asia Pacific cumulative installed capacity by technology (GW)

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance

1.4. INVESTMENT

The forecast capacity build will require cumulative investment of $3.6 trillion by 2026 (Figure 12).

Our investment charts end in 2026 because our modelling runs through 2030, and the technology

with the longest lead time, hydropower, takes around four years between financing and

commissioning.

Figure 12: Asia-Pacific cumulative investment in power generation capacity by

technology, 2013-26 ($bn nominal)

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance

54%36% 33% 30%

13%

12% 12% 14%19%

16% 15% 15%

10% 12% 12%

7% 8% 10%8%

9%9%

2,101

4,587 4,773

4,935

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

2012 2030 Lowerbound

2030 Central 2030 Upperbound

Flexible capacity

Solar thermal

Small-scale PV

Utility-scale PV

Offshore wind

Onshore wind

Biomass

Geothermal

Hydro

Nuclear

Gas

Oil

Coal

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

2013 2015 2020 2025

Solar thermal

Small-scale PV

Utility-scale PV

Offshore wind

Onshore wind

Biomass

Geothermal

Hydro

Nuclear

Gas

Oil

Coal

Page 11: 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK - Metering.com MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK 20 JUNE 2014 © Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015 No portion of this document may be reproduced,

2030 MARKET OUTLOOK

20 JUNE 2014

© Bloomberg Finance L.P.2014

No portion of this document may be reproduced, scanned into an electronic system, distributed, publicly displayed or used as the basis of derivative works without the prior written consent of Bloomberg Finance L.P. For more information on terms of use, please contact [email protected]. Copyright and Disclaimer notice on page 56 applies throughout. Page 9 of 52

As to where the investment will flow, China will attract 58% of the funds ($1,978bn) as most of the

capacity will be commissioned there (Figure 13), followed by India with $754bn and Southeast

Asia with $313bn.

Figure 13: New capital investment by country/region and by technology, 2013-26 ($bn

nominal)

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Note: Figure excludes other and flexible capacity.

For most countries, investment levels will vary significantly throughout the period: Japan will see it

peak in 2015 at $38bn but three years later investment will plummet to $4.7bn due to the end of

the generous solar feed-in tariff. Investment will average some $7.2bn up to 2026. In contrast, in

India, investment will steadily increase over the period, climbing some 338% to $75bn in 2026.

This will principally be powered by the solar PV build, in particular utility-scale projects, as annual

investment reaches $13.8bn. Though China will enjoy the biggest share of the funds, it will see a

much more rise of 14% over the period. That said, its investment forecast for 2026 ($131bn) is

still higher than the aggregate total for the rest of Asia Pacific ($121.5bn).

Figure 14: Asia Pacific annual investment in generation

capacity by country/region, 2013-26 ($bn nominal)

Figure 15: Asia Pacific annual investment in power

generation capacity by technology, 2013-26 ($bn nominal)

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance

Technology wise, the picture looks relatively balanced with large investments flowing to most

renewable technologies, nuclear and coal. Among the renewables, solar and hydro will attract

most capital at $882bn and $622bn respectively (Figure 15). Though it will attract the most

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 2,200

Australia

S.Korea

Japan

SE Asia

India

China

Solar Fossil fuels Wind Other renewables Nuclear

$1,978bn

$203bn

$754bn

$313bn

$102bn

$55bn

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2013 2015 2020 2025

Rest ofAPAC

Australia

South Korea

SE Asia

India

Japan

China0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2013 2015 2020 2025

Solar thermal

Small-scale PV

Utility-scale PV

Offshore wind

Onshore wind

Biomass

Geothermal

Hydro

Nuclear

Gas

Oil

Coal

The expected capacity

build will require an

investment of a

cumulative $3.61 trillion

by 2026; of which $0.91

trillion for solar, $0.62

trillion for hydro and

$0.55 trillion for wind.

Page 12: 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK - Metering.com MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK 20 JUNE 2014 © Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015 No portion of this document may be reproduced,

2030 MARKET OUTLOOK

20 JUNE 2014

© Bloomberg Finance L.P.2014

No portion of this document may be reproduced, scanned into an electronic system, distributed, publicly displayed or used as the basis of derivative works without the prior written consent of Bloomberg Finance L.P. For more information on terms of use, please contact [email protected]. Copyright and Disclaimer notice on page 56 applies throughout. Page 10 of 52

investment of the fossil fuels, coal will see levels steadily decline from $40bn in 2013 to $23bn by

2026. Annual flows to nuclear are the bumpiest over the period, peaking at $66bn in 2019 due to

the technology’s long gestation periods. We also assume that India will allocate no more financing

to the technology from 2023 due to policy uncertainty and fuel restrictions.

On an annual basis, this means that the following technology-country combinations will attract the

most investment: China solar (utility and small-scale) at $38bn/yr, China onshore and offshore

wind at $28bn/yr, Japan solar at $11bn/yr (mostly small-scale), India solar at $10bn/yr (mostly

utility-scale, off-grid or micro-grid), China gas at $3bn/yr, and geothermal in Indonesia and the

Philippines at $3bn/yr.

1.5. GENERATION

In terms of actual electricity generation, the picture looks very different. Although renewable

technologies dominate new capacity and investment, power generation is still heavily skewed

towards existing fossil fuel assets across the region (Figure 16 and Figure 17).

At present, coal produces 62% of the region’s electricity, gas 12% and hydro 16%. Renewables

other than hydro contribute a marginal 4%. By 2030, renewables excluding hydro will generate

significantly more power, but they still only contribute 19% of the total, with hydro delivering an

additional 14%. Coal will still have a share of 43% and gas rises up to 14%.

Figure 16: Asia Pacific power generation by country/region,

2012-30 (TWh)

Figure 17: Asia Pacific power generation by technology,

2012-30 (TWh)

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance

Nevertheless, by 2030 total generation from renewables will reach an estimated 5.8TWh – the

equivalent production that would have otherwise come from 940GW of coal plants (or alternative

sources).2 Nuclear will also see a major expansion throughout Asia Pacific on the back of new

build in China, India and South Korea and the expected restart of part of the existing fleet in

Japan; it will have a 9% share of generation in 2030.

What this capacity build and generation mean for renewable penetration varies considerably

across the region. It could also vary depending on the renewable costs. From an emissions

perspective the share of renewable electricity in total power supply in Asia Pacific is significant. In

this regard Southeast Asia is currently the ‘cleanest’ part of the region, with 27% of its electricity

consumption from renewables (mostly hydro). India and China follow with 26% and 20%

respectively (again mostly hydro). By 2030 we expect India to top this list with 45% of renewables,

2 Assuming an average capacity factor of 75%

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

20,000

2012 2015 2020 2025 2030

Australia

South Korea

SE Asia

India

Japan

China

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

20,000

2012 2015 2020 2025 2030

Solar thermal

Small-scale PV

Utility-scale PV

Offshore wind

Onshore wind

Biomass

Geothermal

Hydro

Nuclear

Gas

Oil

Coal

Total power generation

across Asia Pacific is

expected to grow by 4%

a year. Coal will remain

the top energy source

with a 43% share,

followed by gas at 14%.

Page 13: 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK - Metering.com MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK 20 JUNE 2014 © Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015 No portion of this document may be reproduced,

2030 MARKET OUTLOOK

20 JUNE 2014

© Bloomberg Finance L.P.2014

No portion of this document may be reproduced, scanned into an electronic system, distributed, publicly displayed or used as the basis of derivative works without the prior written consent of Bloomberg Finance L.P. For more information on terms of use, please contact [email protected]. Copyright and Disclaimer notice on page 56 applies throughout. Page 11 of 52

followed by Australia (36%), China (33%), Southeast Asia (31%), Japan (26%), and South Korea

(10%).

Although this may seem to put India and China in a relatively good position regarding their power

sector emissions, they also face the largest electricity demand growth, resulting in an overall

increase in absolute emissions until 2030. If all ‘zero’-emission3 sources (including nuclear) are

taken into account, the picture changes in favour of South Korea (40%), China (43%) and Japan

(34%) – all of which have substantial nuclear capacity in operation or planned.

Box 3: A range of renewables penetration

From a grid perspective the share of variable renewable sources (wind and solar PV) is also

significant. India and Australia will have to deal with the highest penetration levels: from 4%

and 6% in 2013 to a projected 23% and 19% in 2030, respectively. Australia will therefore

have to ensure it has sufficient flexible capacity potentially including power storage, demand

response or additional firm capacity to manage the variability of wind and PV. The same will

apply to India although part of its capacity will be incorporated in mini- or off-grid networks and

will therefore not directly affect the operation of the national grid. The challenges for China and

Japan are comparatively smaller, with 16% and 14% of variable renewables on the grid by

2030 (from 3% and 1% in 2013 respectively). As a comparison, Germany sourced 14% of its

power from wind and PV in 2013. And so, even with the high renewable build, the penetration

of variable renewable sources in Asia-Pacific over the next two decades is unlikely to be

sufficient to warrant significant additional investment in flexible capacity.

Figure 18: Asia Pacific renewables

penetration range, 2012-30 (% generation)

Figure 19: Asia Pacific solar and wind

penetration range, 2012-30 (% generation)

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance

3 We have included nuclear, biomass and large hydro (over 50MW) as part of this group. Although it can be

argued that these are not necessarily zero emissions, we use the definition of zero or neutral emissions at

the point of generation (including emission uptake in the case of biomass).

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

20122015 2020 2025 2030

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

2015 2020 2025 2030

Asia Pacific will hit 33%

of renewable penetration

by 2030, up from 20% in

2012; only looking at

variable sources such as

PV and wind,

penetration will go from

3% to 16% by 2030.

Page 14: 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK - Metering.com MARKET OUTLOOK Asia Pacific 20 June 2014 2030 MARKET OUTLOOK 20 JUNE 2014 © Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2015 No portion of this document may be reproduced,

2030 MARKET OUTLOOK

20 JUNE 2014

© Bloomberg Finance L.P.2014

No portion of this document may be reproduced, scanned into an electronic system, distributed, publicly displayed or used as the basis of derivative works without the prior written consent of Bloomberg Finance L.P. For more information on terms of use, please contact [email protected]. Copyright and Disclaimer notice on page 56 applies throughout. Page 52 of 52

This service is derived from selected public sources. Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates, in

providing the service, believe that the information it uses comes from reliable sources, but do not

guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this information, which is subject to change without

notice, and nothing in this document shall be construed as such a guarantee. The statements in

this service reflect the current judgment of the authors of the relevant articles or features, and do

not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg Finance L.P., Bloomberg L.P. or any of their

affiliates (“Bloomberg”). Bloomberg disclaims any liability arising from use of this document

and/or its contents, and this service. Nothing herein shall constitute or be construed as an

offering of financial instruments or as investment advice or recommendations by Bloomberg of an

investment or other strategy (e.g., whether or not to “buy”, “sell”, or “hold” an investment). The

information available through this service is not based on consideration of a subscriber’s

individual circumstances and should not be considered as information sufficient upon which to

base an investment decision. BLOOMBERG, BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL, BLOOMBERG

MARKETS, BLOOMBERG NEWS, BLOOMBERG ANYWHERE, BLOOMBERG TRADEBOOK,

BLOOMBERG BONDTRADER, BLOOMBERG TELEVISION, BLOOMBERG RADIO,

BLOOMBERG PRESS, BLOOMBERG.COM, BLOOMBERG NEW ENERGY FINANCE and NEW

ENERGY FINANCE are trademarks and service marks of Bloomberg Finance L.P. or its

subsidiaries.

This service is provided by Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates. The data contained within

this document, its contents and/or this service do not express an opinion on the future or

projected value of any financial instrument and are not research recommendations (i.e.,

recommendations as to whether or not to “buy”, “sell”, “hold”, or to enter or not to enter into any

other transaction involving any specific interest) or a recommendation as to an investment or

other strategy. No aspect of this service is based on the consideration of a customer’s individual

circumstances. You should determine on your own whether you agree with the content of this

document and any other data provided through this service. Employees involved in this service

may hold positions in the companies covered by this service.

Disclaimer