WELCOME 2014-15 Grant Panelist Orientation
Who Are We?
Board of Directors
President
Public Art
Public Art Collection & Projects
Arts Council
Grants, BVA Program, Worthgoing.com,
Advocacy, Development
Community Arts Center
Galleries, events, offices, theaters,
building maintenance
Our Mission
The mission of the Arts Council of Fort Worth is to create
an environment that promotes, nurtures, and supports
the arts in our community.
2014 Grants
Over $972,000 disbursed
42 organizations received 79 grants
Total numbers served
over 1 million adults and 600k youth
Estimated total economic impact of funded programs: In
excess of $45 million
Who we fund – a partial list:
Fort Worth Symphony, Fort Worth Opera, Van Cliburn
Foundation, Casa Manana, Stage West, Texas Boys Choir,
Modern Art Museum, Kids Who Care, Classic Guitar Society,
Lone Star Film Society, Arts Fifth Avenue, 619 Productions,
DVA Productions, Trinity Shakespeare, Trumpets4Kids…
…and many, many more!
Who is eligible for funding?
Must be a registered 501(c)(3) organization
Ineligible to apply under the “umbrella” of another organization’s 501(c)(3)
501(c)(3) arts organization for Operating Support
501(c)(3) organizations providing arts programming eligible for Cultural Project Grants and Neighborhood Arts Program Grants
Be able to show at least 2 years of Fort Worth programming
Have prior-year operating expenses of at least $5,000
For any previous grantee – have met all reporting deadlines
For college- or university-sponsored programs, they are eligible as long as the programming is open to the public, reaches a significant non-student population, and has a community-based board of directors or advisory board.
We do not fund:
Debt retirement, endowments, capital improvements, etc.
Interest on loans, fines, penalties, litigation fees
Benefits or special events planned primarily for fundraising
Scholarships, cash awards or prizes
Sub-granting programs
Individual artists, or groups not incorporated as a 501(c)(3)
non-profit
Expenses included on any other current Arts Council grant
applications
Types of Grants
Operating Support
Cultural Project Support
Neighborhood Arts Project Support
Travel and Training, Equipment and First Time Applicant These are reviewed and approved by a
committee of the Board of Directors of the Arts Council.
Requirements of ALL grants
1:1 cash match required to be shown at the end of the
grant period
A Final Report is required from ALL grant recipients for
ALL grant types. This report includes:
budget vs. actuals comparison
approximate numbers of audience members served,
divided into Youth and Adults
demographics information, including approximate ethnic
breakdown of audience served and council districts served
Acknowledgement of Arts Council funding in appropriate
programs, promotional materials, website, etc.
Operating Support
Provides unrestricted funding for general and administrative costs.
Maximum amount of request based on Previous Year Expenses (“PYE”):
$1 million or greater 5% of PYE max request
$450,000 - $999,999 10% of PYE max request
$50,000 - $449,999 15% of PYE max request
Additional eligibility requirements:
Must show at least $50,000 in PYE on financial statements
Must have at least 1 paid staff member (full or part-time)
Base of operations must be within the city of Fort Worth
Cultural Project Support
Provides funding restricted to a single, defined project
to be completed during the grant year
Requests are limited to $8,000, and may not exceed 50%
of project budget
Projects can be recurring from year to year
Application budgets are required to be project-specific;
the budget should not include any administrative or
programmatic funds not directly related to the project.
Neighborhood Arts Program
(“NAP”) Support
Provides funding restricted to a single, defined project
to be completed in an NAP-designated venue during the
grant year
In general, locations are eligible if more than 50% of the
user population falls below the poverty line
Applicants have a list of NAP-eligible venues online
Just as with Cultural Project grants, NAP Project
application budgets should be project-specific
Requests have no maximum dollar limit, but can not
exceed 50% of the project budget
Travel and Training, Equipment,
and First Time Applicant Support
Travel and Training
Open to Fort Worth working artists, arts administrators, and arts educators
Limited to one per year
No more than 3 per organization
Maximum of $500 and requires 1:1 cash match
Equipment
Open to Fort Worth arts organizations
Must support mission of programming for the arts
Maximum of $2,000 and requires 1:1 cash match
First Time Appliant
501(c)(3) organizations wishing to receive project support, either Cultural Projects or NAP
Organizations must go through one on one interview with Arts Council staff prior to requesting grant
Maximum of $2,000 and requires 1:1 cash match
What’s in an application? Organizational information (including mission statement and budget
size)
Project summary, attendance projections
Application narrative addressing:
Managerial ability of the organization (How well are they run?)
Artistic merit (Why does their programming matter?)
Service to the community (Who is their audience and how well do they reach them?)
Attachments, including:
Project or organization budget
Financial statements for the last fiscal year
Organizational information, including programming history & bio of leadership
Demographics information, outlining audience make-up and location(s)
Applicants may also submit attachments such as DVDs, press clippings, Playbills, flyers, etc. This material is passed around during the review session.
Review Panels
Panel 1: Operating Support, Level I Organizations (PYE
>= $450,000)
Panel 2: Operating Support, Level II Organizations (PYE
$50,000 - $449,999)
Panel 3: Cultural Project Support
Panel 4: NAP Project Support
Mini Grants – reviewed by Board of Directors committee
The actual number of applications reviewed by each panel
varies from year-to-year and is based solely on the number
of applicants for each grant.
The Role of Staff
Arts Council staff assists organizations with the
application process, reviews applications upon
submission for technical errors & to ensure
eligibility, and helps facilitate the review sessions.
Staff do not participate in the reviews themselves
Dividing the Workload
All panelists are expected to be familiar with all applications assigned to their panel, BUT…
In order to divide the workload, each panelist will be assigned 2-4 applications that they are responsible for reviewing IN DEPTH
Each application will have 2 panelists assigned
You are expected to have attended at least 1 of the organizations performances – the arts organizations are responsible for sending out invitations.
You are expected to have met with management to discuss managerial ability, artistic merit and service to the community. The arts organizations are responsible for contacting you to set up a meeting.
On review day, the Panel Chair will ask the 2 reviewers assigned to an application to give a summary and their thoughts on the application. Other panelists are then invited to share their questions, comments, or concerns.
Dividing the workload, cont.
Each panelist will receive a list of assignments as soon
as possible after applications have been received.
Sample: Organization Reviewer 1 Reviewer 2
Carp Hall Organa Calrissian
Fort Worth Music Group Solo Organa
Museum of Stuff Madine Mothma
Project DANCE! Calrissian Skywalker
Youth In Action Theater Kenobi Solo
Getting to know the
applicants
All applicants have panel roster with your contact information.
ALL PANELISTS: every applicant is asked to invite their panel members to select programming and provide 2 complimentary tickets
GENERAL OPERATING PANELISTS (Panels 1 & 2): applicants hold “site visits;” basically, informal meetings at which the applicant gives a short presentation on the organization and its programming.
Applicants are responsible for invites & setting up site visits!
Programming & Site Visits
Programming invites
ALL applicants
ALL panelists
In-school, nights, weekends
lectures, concerts, exhibits,
festivals, plays, etc.
Site Visits
Panel 1 & 2 ONLY
Operating grant applicants
ONLY
usually during lunchtime
Pre-review session workload
Before convening in January, you and your fellow
panel members will need to:
Attend programming and site visits (site visits are
for Operating grant reviewers ONLY)
Review the applications assigned to your panel
(available online)
Fill out the evaluation forms for applications to
which you’ve been assigned (also online)
Notify grants program staff of any questions you
have for the applicant
On the actual review day… Panels meet from 8:30 am to 1:00 pm; breakfast and lunch are
provided
Locations and dates are TBD!!!!!
All panelists are required to complete a Conflict of Interest statement
If you do have a Conflict of Interest, you are asked to recuse yourself during deliberations for that particular applicant
Applications are reviewed in alphabetical order
The panel chair (a member of the Board of Directors of the Arts Council) – moderates discussion, calls for votes & approval of recommendations
Staff – keeps track of panel scores, tracks time for each review, provides factual information
Applicants can be contacted via speakerphone for last-minute questions
WE ASK ALL PANELISTS TO PLEASE BRING A LAPTOP/TABLET
We will not have printed materials the day of the review sessions. If you would like to have the materials printed please print yourself and bring with you.
Your assigned applications:
The Panel chair will have a list of organizations and
assigned reviewers.
When it’s your turn, give a summary of the group, your
thoughts on site visits or performances, a description of
the project (if it’s a project application), and any
thoughts or concerns you might have.
Other panel members may then voice their thoughts and
answer any questions.
Scoring & Funding
Recommendations All grants scored on a 100-point scale
Applications are reviewed according to overall:
Managerial Ability
Artistic Merit
Service to the Community
Possible point totals vary by grant type
Scores are averaged to determine their panel score
Funding recommendations are completed by a committee of the Board of Directors of the Arts Council which is made up of all panel chairs plus a few other members.
The recommendations are based on the scores you provide during the review sessions and funding is then mathematically determined by: average score, amount of request, total amount of funding allocated to the panel, number of applicants.
Scoring & Funding cont.
The funding recommendations determined by the
committee of the Arts Council Board will be presented
to the full Board of Directors who will then vote on
whether to approve the recommendations.
IMPORTANT: The Board may also adjust awards as they
see fit: awards are not final until approved by Board
vote.
Comments, Feedback,
Questions
If you have a question, concern, or general feedback for
an applicant, you can simply type that question into the
appropriate area of the Evaluation form.
Alert Grants Program staff, who will then send your
question to the applicant & give them a chance to
respond.
Arts Council staff will also be taking notes during the
review sessions to provide feedback to applicants.
ALL FEEDBACK/QUESTIONS/ETC. ARE ANONYMOUS. AT NO
TIME WILL YOUR NAME BE ATTACHED TO YOUR COMMENTS!
In summary… Once applications are submitted & reviewed by staff,
you’ll receive login information and a list of the applications assigned to your panel
Review applications online & use the Evaluation forms to ask questions, voice concerns, and organize your thoughts
Attend programming throughout the fall (enjoy!)
If you are on a Operating panel, attend site visits
Attend the review session in January (exact date TBD) at which time the entire Panel will convene, review, and score.
Attend the Grant Awards Presentation – date in February TBD.
Account Information
All grant panelists will have accounts created for them
by the program administrator – you cannot register on
your own!
Default login information:
User name: email address
Password: Password1
We can reset passwords if you get stuck!
The Basics…
Be as objective as possible
Applications should stand on their own merits
We fund on MERIT, not NEED
Evaluation Criteria for all grants is a combination of:
Managerial Ability
Artistic Merit
Service to the community
Keep in mind – the applicants have access to the Evaluation
Criteria – they know what it is you will be looking for
Remember – your job as a panelist is to be a good
steward of public funds.
In general…
Does the application give a clear picture of the applicant?
Who, What, When, Where, Why
For projects – is the project description clear? What would
we be funding?
Is the programming proposed in the application reasonable
given the applicant’s mission, programming history, and
abilities?
Can you tell what the organization does? Who they serve?
What type of programming they produce?
Managerial Ability
Overall effectiveness of the organization
Presentation of a clear and realistic budget
Organizational stability
Effective marketing of programming
Evidence of / or potential for financial support from the
community
Long-range/strategic plan?
Administrative efforts effective?
Good Staff-Board relationship?
Diverse Board of Directors?
Artistic Merit
Artistic product perceived to be high quality by
audience
Innovation and creativity in programming and artistic
selections
Strong leadership and vision in artistic staff
Programming is appropriate to and supports the mission
of the organization
Artistic staff effective?
Service to the Community
Diversity in the audience (appropriate to the mission
and programming)
Diversity on the board of directors
Efforts to reach and education current & potential
audience members
Programming attracts an audience appropriate to the
organization’s activities (locals vs. visitors, children vs.
adults, etc.)
Activities have local, regional, national or international
impact
Budgets & Financials
For Operating budgets, are variances of +/- 20% from
year-to-year explained?
Deficits/surpluses? If so, are they explained?
Audits – is there a Qualified Opinion? If so, why? Is
there a “Going Concern”?
Cultural & NAP Project budgets:
Appropriate to the scope of the project?
Are they predicting a surplus/deficit?
How diverse is their income stream?
NAP Projects – usually NO earned income
How NOT to review:
Your job is not to judge the artistic product itself, but how effectively is that product being produced and presented to its intended audience.
Your job is not to dictate to the organization how they should present their product. Instead, it is to judge the effectiveness of the manner in which they present their product to their intended audience.
Letting emotion into the equation – no matter how much you may love the organization, you need to be as objective as possible.
Everyone has a bad day – don’t let one performance influence your overall judgment too much.
Remember – you will be reviewing organizations with widely divergent budget & staff sizes! Be careful not to make apples-to-apples comparisons.