Top Banner
© 2013 Rey Ty Philosophy Made Simple: Ethics ©2013 Rey Ty Northern Illinois University
60

2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

Dec 17, 2014

Download

Documents

Rey Ty

 
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Philosophy Made Simple: Ethics

©2013 Rey TyNorthern Illinois University

Page 2: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 3: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Ethics•“a code or set of principles by which live” (p. 1).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 4: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Ethics1. Classical Ethics

2. Modern Ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 5: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Classical Ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 6: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Classical Ethics•“if we know what the good life is, we will naturally act in such a way as to try to achieve it” (pp. 2-3).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 7: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Classical Ethics1. Platonism2. Aristotle’s Mean3. Epicurus: Hedonism4. Cynicism5. Stoicism6. Christian Ethics7. Spinoza8. Bentham & JS Mill:

Utilitarianism9. Kantian Ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 8: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Platonism

•“evil is due to lack of knowledge” (p. 3)•“finding the nature of the good life is an intellectual task very similar to the discovery of mathematical truths” (p. 3)•“develop virtuous habits of behavior”…& “develop their mental powers through the study of such disciplines as mathematics and philosophy” (p. 3)•“imitate and are guided by those people who have knowledge of the good” (p. 3).•“absolutism:” “there is…one and only one good life for all to lead” (p. 4) © 2013 Rey Ty

Page 9: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Aristotelian Ethics

• Use of reason• “scientific or empirical approach to ethical

problems” (p. 7)• “The good life for people is a life of

happiness” (p. 8)© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 10: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Aristotelian Ethics

• “People ought to behave so as to achieve happiness” (p. 8)

• “golden mean” (p. 8)

• “various correct ways of living for different people” (p. 9)

•“Aristotle is both a relativist and an empiricist in ethics” (p. 9)

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 11: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Aristotelian Ethics

• “golden mean:” “In order to achieve happiness, people must act moderately, they must act so as to be striving for the mean between two extremes” (p. 9)

Page 12: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Hedonism•“pleasure must be in some way an ingredient of happiness” (p. 11)

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 13: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Hedonism

• “The ethical philosophy of Epicurus consists mainly of advice for living moderately but pleasurably” (p. 11).

• “but…if a person pursues pleasure too arduously, pain will follow” (p. 11).

• “live pleasantly without suffering from any of the undesirable effects of such living” (p. 11)

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 14: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Cynicism

• “the world was fundamentally evil; in order to live properly, people must withdraw from participation in it” (p. 17)

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 15: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Stoicism• “Learn to be

indifferent to external influences!” (p. 18)

• “good or evil depends upon oneself” (p. 19).

• “free oneself from desires and passions” (p. 19)

• “By practicing indifference one become independent of the world” (p. 19).

• “predestination, i.e., that all happenings in the world are fixed by God” (p. 19).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 16: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Christian Ethics

• Decalogue (10 Commandments)• Immortality (p. 23)• Neoplatonism (Augustine) (p. 23)• “favor asceticism” (p. 23)

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 17: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Spinoza• “relativist”

(p. 30)

• “nothing is good or bad by itself but is so only in relation to someone” (p. 30).

• “a person will be happy when he/she comes to understand that there are limits to human power; by understanding that everything that happens must happen necessarily, one will no longer dissipate one’s energy in struggling against these events” (p. 30).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 18: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Utilitarianism• Jeremy Bentham & John

Stuart Mill

• “An action is right insofar as it tends to produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number” (p. 32)

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 19: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Utilitarianism• “it lays stress upon the effects that an

action has. If an action produces an excess of beneficial effects over harmful ones, then it is right; otherwise, it is not” (p. 33).

• “separate the rightness or wrongness of an action from the goodness or badness of the agent who performs the action” (p. 33)

• “a political philosophy that entails democratic government as a political institution” (p. 33).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 20: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Kantian Ethics• “the moral law requires that people

be rewarded proportionately to their virtue” (p. 35)

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 21: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Kantian Ethics•“ a person is acting morally only if he suppresses his/her feelings and inclinations and does that which he/she is obliged to do” (p. 36).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 22: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Kantian Ethics•“…

morality…is closely

bound up with one’s duties and

obligations” (p. 36).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 23: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Kantian Ethics

• “the essence of morality is to be found in the motive from which an act is done” (p. 37).

• “a person is moral when he/she acts for a sense of duty” (p. 37).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 24: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Kantian Ethics•“There is therefore one categorical imperative, namely this: act only on that maxim whereby thou canst at the same time will that it should become a universal law” (p. 39).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 25: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Kantian Ethics•“So act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as a means only” (p. 40).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 26: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Kantian Ethics“to behave morally one must behave consistently, i.e., ‘universalize his behavior’” (p. 48).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 27: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Modern Ethics1. Moral Realism:

Subjectivism & Objectivism

2. Naturalism, Nonnaturalism & Emotivism

3. Motivist, Consequence & Deontological Theories

4. Applied Ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 28: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Modern Ethics

•“engage in philosophical analysis without necessarily being committed to giving any sort of advice for living” (p. 43).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 29: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Modern Ethics

•“that branch of philosophy that applies analysis to moral theory” (p. 43).

Page 30: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Modern Ethics

•“Philosophical analysis is frequently considered to be the search for the necessary and sufficient conditions that determine the meaning of a term, although this is not its only job” (p. 44).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 31: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Modern Ethics

•“The function of analysis is to make the question precise so that we will know how to reply to it” (p. 44).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 32: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Modern Ethics

•Classification of Modern Theories: Subjectivism & Objectivism (Moral Realism) p. 45

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 33: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Modern Ethics

•“modern ethical theories are primarily concerned with the analysis of the language of morals” (p. 45).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 34: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Modern Ethics•“ ‘We can define ‘objectivistic’ by saying that any theory that is non-subjectivistic is objectivistic’ ” (p. 45).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 35: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Subjectivistic Ethics

•“If the theory holds that what are ordinarily called ‘ethical’ judgments (such as “Stealing is wrong’) are neither true nor false, it is subjectivistic” (p. 45).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 36: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

•“If the theory holds that ethical judgments are true or false but that they are always about the psychology of th person who utters them and only that person, then again it is subjectvistic” (p. 45).

Subjectivistic Ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 37: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Naturalism, Nonnaturalism & Emotivism (p. 47)

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 38: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Naturalism•“A theory will be regarded as naturalistic if it holds both that moral judgments are true or false, and also that such judgments are reducible entirety to the concepts of some natural science (usually psychology” (p. 46). © 2013 Rey Ty

Page 39: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Nonnaturalism

•“…it holds that moral judgments are true or false, but that they are not reducible to any natural science” (p. 46).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 40: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Emotivism•“…it contends that moral judgments are neither true nor false but are merely expressions of feelings of those who utter them and evocative of the feelings of those who hear them” (p. 46).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 41: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Emotivism•Emotivists include “A. J. Ayer, C. L. Stevenson, Rudolf Carnap” (p. 27).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 42: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Emotivism•“moral judgments are about one’s feelings” (p. 47).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 43: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Motivist, Consequence & Deontological Theories

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 44: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Motivism•“the rightness or wrongness of an action depends upon the motive from which the act was done” (p. 47).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 45: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Consequence Theory

•“rightness or wrongness of an action depends entirely upon the effects that the action has” (p. 47).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 46: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Hedonistic Consequence Theory•“rightness or wrongness of an action depends upon whether it

produces consequences that are painful or pleasant” (p. 48).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 47: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Agathistic Consequence Theory

•“goodness is not to be identified with pleasure, or badness with pain, but is something unique” (p. 48).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 48: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Deontological Theories•“rightness or wrongness of an act depends neither upon the motive from which the act was done nor upon the consequences of the act—but solely upon what kind of an act it was” (p. 48).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 49: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Deontological Theories

•“Because they stress the notions of obligations and duty, deontological theories are often describes as ‘duty ethics’ ” (p. 48).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 50: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Subjectivism•“the argument based on an analysis of the language that we use to make moral judgments” (p. 48).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 51: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Subjectivism“such judgments are more

than statements of descriptions of something.

They are also prescriptions” (p. 48).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 52: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Subjectivism•Moral judgments “are imperatives, commands to someone, and they are evaluations—expressions of one’s own personal values” (p. 48).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 53: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Subjectivism•“argument from

sentience” involving “feelings, desires,

appetites, attitudes, knowledge” (p. 49).

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 54: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Subjectivism•“reject objectivistic theories such as utilitarianism. What is the point of working for the greatest happiness of the greatest number if you personally become unhappy by so doing? In the final analysis, what can be more important than you?” (p. 49).

Egoistic argument:

Page 55: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Objectivism•“’a theory that responds more closely to the views of people of common sense about moral matters than does subjectivism” (p. 50).

Page 56: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Objectivism

•“there is no essential difference between a dispute about moral

matters and a dispute about factual ones” (p. 51).

Page 57: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

References

•Popkin, R. H. & Stroll, A. (1993). Philosophy made easy. New York: Three Rivers Press. •Photos from the web.

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 58: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Thank You!

© 2013 Rey Ty

Page 59: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Ethics

Rey TyNorthern Illinois University

Page 60: 2013 rey ty philosophy ethics

© 2013 Rey Ty

Philosophy Made Simple

© 2013 Rey TyNorthern Illinois University