Exploring the Challenges of Network Leadership in Australasian Tertiary Associations 1 Symposium ascilite 2012 - Wellington 1 Monday, 26 November 12
Oct 21, 2014
Exploring the Challenges of Network Leadership in
Australasian Tertiary Associations
1
Symposium ascilite 2012 - Wellington
1Monday, 26 November 12
OverviewnWhat is NATA?nPartnersnProject teamnVisionnMissionnPrinciplesnObjectivesnOutcomesnGPRnResearch
2
2Monday, 26 November 12
Network of Australasian Tertiary Associations
(NATA)
3
3Monday, 26 November 12
Lead
Collaborative
Enabling
4Monday, 26 November 12
Project TeamnMike Keppell (NATA) & Gordon Suddaby
(NATA)
nDenise Chalmers (CADAD), Shelda Debowski (HERDSA), Helen Carter (ACODE), Caroline Steel (ascilite), Mutuota Kigotho (ODLAA), James Sankar (AARnet), Kim Edgar (Netspot), Marguerite De Sousa (OLT), Lindy Baker (OLT)
nNatasha Hard (NATA), Maree Potter (NATA), Karen Halley (ACODE/NATA)
5
5Monday, 26 November 12
How many people are members of more than one tertiary education
professional association?
6
6Monday, 26 November 12
Why do you belong to a tertiary education
professional association?
7
7Monday, 26 November 12
VisionnThe overarching vision for the Network of
Australasian Tertiary Associations (NATA) is to facilitate a sustainable collaborative network between established tertiary education associations with the intent of fostering best practice in networks to engage members more strongly with Australasian tertiary education learning and teaching.
8
8Monday, 26 November 12
Mission
nThe mission of the NATA is to improve engagement and practice through network leadership.
9
9Monday, 26 November 12
Guiding Principles for Partner Participation
10
10Monday, 26 November 12
Collaborative AdvantageCollaborative Advantage: Partners create/co-design new value together as opposed to mere exchange through their involvement in the NATA project. In addition, partners engage with each other through their complementary assets and skills and contribute some in-kind support for the NATA.
11
11Monday, 26 November 12
Strategic Alignment & Communication• Strategic Alignment & Communication: There is alignment between the NATA vision, mission and objectives with the activities of the collaborative and enabling partners. In addition, partners share ideas in the spirit of collaboration through open, constructive, and critical dialogue in relation to tertiary education learning and teaching.
12
12Monday, 26 November 12
Integrity
Integrity: Partners work with each other in the spirit of mutual trust and respect which includes having a clear understanding of the management, decision-making and financial allocation of the project.
13
13Monday, 26 November 12
SustainablitySustainability: The NATA will contribute to integrated, generative and future-focused strategies to maintain and sustain effective leadership and best practice in tertiary education learning and teaching.
14
14Monday, 26 November 12
What other principles have you found useful?
15
15Monday, 26 November 12
ObjectivesImprove the effectiveness of communication and engagement with NATA members at large
Enable and support network leaders of collaborative partners to encourage collaboration and increase membership engagement
16
16Monday, 26 November 12
ObjectivesReview the utilisation of technologies to support best practice in network engagement
Promote, disseminate and enhance the outcomes of the Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC), OLT and selected Good Practice Reports
Conduct research into the NATA
17
17Monday, 26 November 12
Objectives
Foster, encourage and support further network-based collaborative initiatives
Manage the project in an effective and efficient way
18
18Monday, 26 November 12
Outcomes
nDevelop a strategic alliance of tertiary education Associations
Key Objective 1- Improve the effectiveness of communication and engagement with NATA members at largeKey Objective 2- Enable and support network leaders of collaborative partners to encourage collaboration and increase membership engagementKey Objective 3- Review the utilisation of technologies to support best practice in network engagement
nDisseminate Good Practice ReportsKey Objective 5 - Promote, disseminate and enhance the outcomes of Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC), OLT and selected Good Practice Reports.
19
19Monday, 26 November 12
OutcomesnDevelop a sustainable networkKey Objective 4- Foster, encourage and support further network-based collaborative initiatives
nProject Management: The successful delivery of project outcomes
Key Objective 7- Manage the project in an effective and efficient way
nResearch Informed Practice: The research outcomes as a result of the project
Key Objective 6- Conduct research into the NATA
20
20Monday, 26 November 12
Other outcomes that you consider important?
21
21Monday, 26 November 12
Good Practice ReportsnALTC awarded 264 projects, 52 fellowships
(1st December, 2010)nCommissioned 11 GPRsnAssuring graduate outcomes nBlended learning nCurriculum renewalnSupporting students’ transition into higher
education
22
22Monday, 26 November 12
Good Practice ReportsnWork-integrated learningn Assessment of science, technology,
engineering and mathematics n Innovative Indigenous learning and teaching nRevitalising the academic workforce nTechnology-enhanced learning and
teaching nClinical teachingnSupport for international students.
23
23Monday, 26 November 12
How many people have heard of the ‘Good Practice Reports’?
24
24Monday, 26 November 12
Technology-enhanced Learning and Teaching Good Practice Report
25
25Monday, 26 November 12
Guiding QuestionsnHow do we recognise Good Practice in
technologically-enhanced learning and teaching?
nHow do we communicate/disseminate Good Practice in technologically-enhanced learning and teaching?
nHow do we integrate Good Practice into learning and teaching?
26
26Monday, 26 November 12
Technology-enhanced Learning and Teaching Good practice report
n25 complete projects (including three fellowships)
n8 ongoing projects (including one fellowship)
27
27Monday, 26 November 12
What is Technology-enhanced Learning?
nLaurillard, Oliver, Wasson & Hoppe (2009) suggest that the “role of technology [is] to enable new types of learning experiences and to enrich existing learning scenarios” (p. 289).
28
28Monday, 26 November 12
Approach
29
1. Meta-analysis of 33 projects
2. Matrix 3.Thematically Analysed
4. 10 Themes/outcomes
5.Literature review
6.Recommendations
29Monday, 26 November 12
OutcomesnA focus on learning design allows
academics to model and share good practice in learning and teaching
nAuthentic learning provides a means of engaging students through all aspects of curricula, subjects, activities and assessment
nSuccessful academic development focuses on engaging academics over sustained periods of time through action learning cycles and the provision of leadership development opportunities
30
30Monday, 26 November 12
OutcomesnEngaging teaching approaches are key to
student learning nTechnology-enhanced assessment provides
flexible approaches for academics to provide feedback to students
nIntegrating technology-enhanced learning and teaching strategies across curriculum, subjects, activities and assessment results in major benefits to the discipline
nKnowledge and resource sharing are central to a vibrant community of practice
31
31Monday, 26 November 12
OutcomesnAcademics require sophisticated online
teaching strategies to effectively teach in technology-enhanced higher education environments
nAcademics need a knowledge of multi-literacies to teach effectively in contemporary technology-enhanced higher education
nExemplar projects focused on multiple outcomes across curricula integration, sustainable initiatives, academic development and community engagement.
32
32Monday, 26 November 12
Research
33
33Monday, 26 November 12
Research QuestionsnWhat network leadership strategies
support good practice in leading networks to foster engagement of members in established Australasian Tertiary Education Associations?
nWhat communication strategies, technologies, and approaches support good practice to foster engagement of members in established Australasian Tertiary Education Associations?
nWhat common ground exists between organisations that could provide a basis for collaboration into the future?
34
34Monday, 26 November 12
Research
nFocus groups with network leaders in each organization
nInterviews with President/Vice-president
n Surveys of NATA members
35
35Monday, 26 November 12
Possible Outcomesn Improved understanding of network
leadership and network leadership strategiesn Improved understandings of the types and
efficacy of existing communication strategies that are currently in use within HE networks
n Improved understanding of cross-partner synergies and rationale for continued collaboration
n Enhanced collaboration and communication within and between participating associations
36
36Monday, 26 November 12
NATA Websitehttp://nataonthenet.blogspot.com
37
37Monday, 26 November 12
38Monday, 26 November 12
PhasesnPhase 1: ‘Getting on the Same
Page’ (face-to-face discussions, communication strategy, learning about/from each other)
nPhase 2: Research ( focus groups, interviews, partner projects, survey).
nPhase 3: Dissemination (conferences, symposiums, presentations in each partner organization, publications, projects,good practice guidelines, connection to other networks)
nPhase 4: Sustainability
39
39Monday, 26 November 12