2010.05.07.. Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION: DISCURSIVE PERSPECTIVE TOWARDS SUPERVISION I NTERNATIONAL S CIENTIFIC C ONFERENCE SOCIAL.

2010.05.07.

Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas

SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION: DISCURSIVE PERSPECTIVE TOWARDS SUPERVISION

INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION: BENEFIT AND CHALLENGES OF FIELD PLACEMENT SUPERVISION

Rasa Naujanienė

LAYOUT

• Historical outlook• Our days supervision• Looking for personal way of

supervisor practice


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

What is a supervision?

• Literally, the word supervision means to “oversee the actions or work of a person” (Freeth, 2001).

• It derives from the Latin super “over“ and “videre” to watch, to see” (Kadushin, 1976, 19).


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.


“An educational process in which a person with a certain equipment of knowledge and skill takes responsibility for training a person with less equipment” (Robinson, 1936, 53).


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

Social Work Supervision


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

Is as old as social work exists.

Its development has been shaped by (1) practice environment and (2) the process of social work

professionalization.

Historical outlook


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

• Origins are generally argued to be administrative - Charity movements of late 19th century. Persons, who supervised distribution of charity were named as a Supervisors.

Historical outlook


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

•Educational focus developed between 1910’s to 1920’s when social work education moved from industry to Universities.

•The integration of psychoanalytic theory supported the development of supervision’s educational focus; especially case work practice in social work and supervision became traditionally case analysis.

Historical outlook


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

• In 1950’s to 1970’s the emphasis of psychoanalytic theory shifted supervisory focus from the work to worker. The understanding that a social worker by itself is the main instrument for intervention.

Historical outlook


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

• Since late 1970’s accountability (possibility to give explanation for one’s action) together with personal support have been a dominant themes in social work supervision literature.

• New insights into the supervisory context. Not only agency but dynamic interaction among client, worker, supervisor and agency systems at the personal and social levels.

Historical outlook


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

• Since 1980’s the contextual supervision approach provides a framework through which the reflective conversation can examine, deconstruct and reconstruct client’s, supervisee’s and supervisor’s and agencies narratives within parties of social realities.

Trends in supervision

• All methods found spase in supervision– Psychotherapy

– Gestalt supervizija

– Supervision based on Psychodrama

– Constructive supervision


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

Modern trends

• Supervision found necessity to separate supervision from therapy.

• Supervisor is defined as active consultant in working with probelms coming from professional work field.


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

Nowadays supervision (Kessel, 2002):


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

• is a complex method handled by well-trained supervisors who can apply supervision as a method to further the competence of self-reflection of professional workers and for leadership in different sectors of service and labor.

• Supervisors do their work in different settings, at different system levels and in different organizational contexts.

Nowadays supervision


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

• has separated itself from practice training and from work/task oriented guiding in organizations.

• Supervision as a professional service, has no unambiguous meaning, which depends on historical and contextual influences, and on the choice of particular paradigmatic views (Kessel, 2002).

Nowadays supervision


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

• is a method of consultation of professional performance.

• During supervision person reflect his/her practice and have abilities to evaluate his/her performance within organization.

• Develop multidimensional capability to conceive professional situations and consciously use yourself as instrument of intervention.

Why do we need supervision?

• There are many wrong solution in work. It happens because many reasons:

• Inaccurate information (klaidinga informacija) or inaccurate understanding of information (klaidingas informacijos apdorojimas)

• Personal characteristics (asmeninės žmonių ypatybės).


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

Why do we need supervision?

• Not ability to find strategies or not seeing possibilities how to apply them (neradimas strategijų arba neradimas galimybių kaip jas pritaikyti)

• Interconection in various power relations (Susisaistymas su įvairiausiomis galiomis) and other.


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.


Supervision is a dialog. Dialog which occur not accidently, not in chatting with friends in cafe, not in meeting social worker with client and not in employee meeting with boss.


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.



Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

Supervision is a dialog which occurs in the formal occasions:• Supervisee meeting with supervisor. That is called – individual supervision. • Group of employees as supervisee (usually from different organizations) meeting with supervisor. That is called – group supervision.• Team of employees as supervisee (usually from one organization) meeting with supervisor. That is called – team supervision.

Supervision is asking questions and looking for answers.


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.



Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

Supervision as dialog not means giving-getting advice.

Dialog considers sharing experiences in work placements among supervisees, but not only.

It considers getting emotional support, but not only.

Supervision as a strategic dialog


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

Dialog about supervisee job situations and development of plan, strategic plan how to move forward in work activities that:

To work more effectively,To feel better in work life.


• It doesn’t matter in which area person works (social work, education, health care and etc.), the employee needs talker (pašnekovo) with whom he/she could challenge own solutions in work (kvestionuoti savo sprendimus).

• Good work and good solutions could be made only in that case if there is possibility to put a question-marks (kelti klaustukus) at the institutional level.

• These question-marks relates with supervision perspective, where questions are analyzed in complexity (Bernd Jansen, 2010).


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.



Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

It needs time to develop:

• plan to move forward

• competence to reflect practical situation

• to become self-reflective for ability to develop strategic plans not only during supervision sessions.

What is theoretical background of supervision as a dialog?


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

At first it is eclectic background.

In that point supervision theory is very close with social work theory.

Dialog presume interaction.

Origins of social constructionism

• Symbolic interactionism’ (Mead 1934)

• Ethnomethodology (since 1950)

• Phenomenology philosophy (Husserl 1975) and Schütz (1962-6)


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

Assumptions for discursive approach on social work and supervision

• Social work as well as supervision is a socially constructed activities.

• The way we talk about our practice is actually part of our practice (Hawkins et al. 2001).


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

Key assumptions in social constructionism

• Reality is a social construct which is an effect of social processes through which people ‘come to describe, explain or […] account for the world including themselves in which they live’ (Gergen 2003, 15).


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

Key themes in social constructionism

• A critical stance towards taken-for-granted knowledge.

• Language. Language as a form of social action.• Multiplicity. A focus on interaction, social

practices and on processes.• Context. Historical and cultural specifity of

knowledge


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

Language

• Language is one interaction and it is actually the main kind through which people construct what it is considered “truth” at any given moment.

• We need to study language in order to study anything at all (de Shazer 1993, 84).


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

Multiplicity

• The idea that social constructionism is an ongoing process which occurs through interaction prompts an idea that these shared and “negotiated” understandings about “reality” could take on a wide variety of forms.

• It leads to an assumption that numerous possible “social constructions” dependent on time and place of the world could be considered. Each different construction relates with a different kind of action by a human being (Parton & Marshall 1998, 241).


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

Context

• Social constructionists “share the view that context organizes meaning” (Gubrium & Holstein 1999, 291).

• They argue that the ways in which people commonly understand the world and the categories and concepts they use to explain the world are historically and culturally specific (Burr 1995, 3-4).


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

AČIŪ UŽ DĖMESĮ! / THANK YOU!


Rasa Naujanienė

2010.05.21.

KVIETIMASĮ SUPERVIZORIŲ IR KOUČERIŲ RENGIMO

PROGRAMĄ2010-2012 metai

Besidominčius prašome kreiptis tel.: 8686 30573; 8 (37) 327846 arba registruotis iki š.m. rugsėjo 10 d. arba el.paštu: [email protected]

2010.05.07.. Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION: DISCURSIVE PERSPECTIVE TOWARDS SUPERVISION I NTERNATIONAL S CIENTIFIC C ONFERENCE SOCIAL.

Documents

supervision rasa naujanien2010

social worker

discursive perspective

social levels

word supervision

parties of social realities

case work practice

s accountability possibility