Top Banner
1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Education’s Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent Alyson Barilarri, Associate Superintendent Thomas Dugan, Director OUR GOAL IS BEST PRACTICES IN NEWARK’S SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS Professional Development Staff For Code & Procedure’s Questions contact Mitchel Gerry, Mary Hart, Sakinah Springs, or Sandy Bruno. For Technology Questions contact Joe Fonseca. Report Summaries – May 2006
22

1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

Mar 26, 2015

Download

Documents

Kylie Carpenter
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

1

Newark Public Schools Office of Special Education’s

Professional Development Center

Marion Bolden, SuperintendentAnzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent

Alyson Barilarri, Associate SuperintendentThomas Dugan, Director

OUR GOAL IS BEST PRACTICES IN NEWARK’S

SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS

Professional Development Staff

For Code & Procedure’s Questions contact Mitchel Gerry, Mary Hart, Sakinah Springs, or Sandy Bruno. For Technology Questions contact Joe Fonseca.

Report Summaries – May 2006

Page 2: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

2

This presentation covers writing summaries for discipline assessments and reports that will be:

1. User-friendly for stakeholders who need to understand and utilize reports in school and at home (e.g., teachers, administrators, CST colleagues, and parents);

2. Aligned with participation and progress in the general education curriculum and program; and

3. Utilized by stakeholders in making code-mandated eligibility and IEP decisions.

Page 3: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

3

To Accomplish these Goals, Summaries must Include 5 Components

1. Reason for referral 2. Evaluation results that support and/or contradict the

suspected disabling condition identified at the “identification” meeting

3. Weaknesses that interfere with participation and progress in the general education curriculum/program

4. Strengths that facilitate participation and progress in the general education curriculum/program

5. Recommendations that will facilitate participation and progress in the general education curriculum and program

Page 4: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

4

1st ComponentSample Reason for Referral – This can be a reiteration of

the written referral &/or additional clarification of information from the identification meeting

Armando, a 13.7 year-old Hispanic male in the seventh grade, was referred by his teacher because of academic and behavioral concerns. Although Armando has a good sight vocabulary and has developed basic concepts, he is not working on grade level and can be disruptive in the classroom. According to the teacher, Armando needs directions repeated and extra time provided to complete assignments.

Page 5: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

5

2nd ComponentDoes Evaluation Support the Existence of the

Suspected Disabling Condition noted at the Determination (Identification) Meeting?

1. Utilize code definitions of disabling conditions to guide and limit your response. You must state one of the 13 code-delineated disabilities.

2. There are only 2 disabling conditions that require a statistical reference (standard deviations) – cognitively impaired and communication impaired.

3. Include a statement that your evaluation supports or does not support the suspected disabling condition, with a brief description of your assessment results that are consistent with code delineated definition.

4. The eligibility and disability decisions are determined by the IEP team and not by the individual disciplines!

Page 6: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

6

Example – 2nd Component of Summary for Specific Learning Disability

The evaluation supports the existence of a specific learning disability, which was identified at the determination meeting. Harvey’s deficits in verbal processing, as well as reading and written language, represent a significant discrepancy from his average cognitive ability.

Page 7: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

7

According to this assessment, Pete’s delayed developmental milestones, deficits in adaptive behavior, and a score two to three standard deviations below the mean on an individually administered test of intelligence, support the possibility of a mild cognitive impairment.

Example 2nd Component of SummaryMild Cognitive Impairment

Page 8: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

8

According to this assessment, Franny’s long history of verbal and physically acting out behaviors, which are frequently violent and result in injuries, have prevented her development of appropriate interpersonal relationships with peers and teachers. These problems have an adverse impact on Franny’s school behavior and achievement and support the suspected disability of emotionally disturbed.

Example 2nd Component of SummaryEmotionally Disturbed

Page 9: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

9

The results of JoAnn’s speech and language assessments indicate communication impairment in the areas of language and articulation. This was demonstrated on two oral language assessments as well as an articulation assessment in which JoAnn’s performance placed her below the 10th percentile and/or 1.5 standard deviations below the norm. The functional component further substantiates JoAnn’s difficulty with comprehension of verbal directions

Example 2nd Component of SummaryCommunication Impaired

Page 10: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

10

The result of Clinical Assessment of Articulation and Phonology yielded a standard score of 70 which falls within the 8th percentile rank. Barbara presents with an articulation disorder with the sibilant sounds /s/, /sh/, and /z/ sounds in conversational speech. Classroom observation confirms these results.

Example 2nd Component of SummaryEligible for Speech-Language Services

Page 11: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

11

2nd Component of summary if a lack of instruction in reading or math or limited English proficiency are the determining

factors, because these causes are specifically excluded in code.

This assessment reveals that Gertha is functioning significantly below grade-level academic expectations which may be a result of the student’s excessive absences in grades two through five. Consequently Gertha has not been consistently instructed in all curriculum areas for an extended period of time.

Page 12: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

12

3rd Component of Summary - List weaknesses identified in evaluation that prevent participation and progress in the

general curriculum and program.

Sources of information for this section:

1. Evaluation results

2. Referral information

3. Teacher input

4. Parent input

5. District and state assessments

6. Sample of student work

Page 13: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

13

3rd Component of SummarySample Weakness Statements

“Because of Pam’s auditory processing difficulties, she experiences significant problems in academics, which rely heavily on language. This is evident in her failure to achieve proficiency in language arts literacy on district wide and statewide assessments. In particular, written work is poorly organized with insufficient content and inadequate sentence construction when compared to grade expectations. In addition, reading comprehension is impeded by long passages beyond 500 words, limited vocabulary, poor note taking skills, and identifying the main idea expected for students in the same grade. In addition, Pam’s slow cognitive processing has had a negative impact on her ability to write and read selections at a speed expected of students in the same grade.”

Page 14: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

14

3rd Component of Summary – Weaknesses - & How to Integrate into the IEP

1. PLAAFP – weaknesses stemming from the disability that interfere with participation and progress in the general curriculum and program

2. Goals – weaknesses are usually based on a gap between what is expected of the student in the general curriculum/ program and the student’s present performance, which could then lead directly to goals

3. Special education services, accommodations, and programs that the student needs to achieve goals and facilitate participation, as well as progress in the general curriculum/ program

Page 15: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

15

Component 4 of Summary - List strengths identified in evaluation that facilitate participation and progress in the

general curriculum and program.

Sources of information for this section:

1. Evaluation results

2. Referral information

3. Teacher input

4. Parent input

5. District and state assessments

6. Sample of student work

Page 16: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

16

This assessment indicates that Tom’s motivation, on task engagement, andperformance increases when interested in an activity. This seems evident in hisrelative strengths in math, science, and hands-on activities. Tom’s strengths toreason and problem solve nonverbally also contribute to progress in math andscience. Here he has achieved proficiency on district assessments as well as Bs and Cs on report cards over the past two years. These strengths can beapplied to other subjects and extra curricular activities.  

Additionally, Tom’s strong interpersonal skills are demonstrated in cooperativelearning activities, where his good planning and leadership skills are utilized. Heappears to have excellent social skills. He is cooperative and respectful, withexcellent self-help skills and provides a good deal of assistance to his family outsideof school. These strengths have facilitated Tom’s participation and progress in thegeneral program and provide a foundation for future growth.

Component 4 of Summary - Sample

Page 17: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

17

Component 4 – How can identified strengths be integrated into the recommendations, as well as

various IEP components

1. PLAAFP – strengths that facilitate participation and progress in the general curriculum/program

2. Strengths can be utilized as accommodations, motivations, and reinforcements in the IEP to facilitate participation and progress in the general curriculum/program

Page 18: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

18

Component 5 of Summary - Recommendations from summaries that can be utilized to facilitate

student’s participation and progress in the general curriculum/program

1. Recommendations could derive from addressing student’s weaknesses and utilizing strengths.

2. The gap between the student’s current functioning and what is expected of him/her needs to be bridged. Therefore, the recommendations can include strategies, modifications, services, and goals to address this gap.

3. The recommendations can frequently lead to IEP mandates. Therefore, think about the IEP components when completing this section (e.g., special factors, such as behavioral and communication needs, curriculum accommodations, support for staff, etc.)

Page 19: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

19

Sample one of Component 5

Irwin would benefit from remediation in the following areas to make progress in the general education curriculum:

• Structural analysis and syllabication to increase word recognition and comprehension of multi-syllabic words

• Identification of cause and effect, fact and opinion, main idea and supporting details in texts to increase his comprehension in content areas

• Pre/during/ post reading strategies to increase reading comprehension with fictional material

• Direct instruction on each skill at the proficiency level of the writing rubric

Page 20: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

20

Sample 2 of Component 5

Marilyn would benefit from strategies and accommodations to support her continued growth in reading and written language functions that cross all academic areas, such as:

1. Teacher may state and post the lesson objective, and supply an outline of the material to be covered verbally

2. Student may:– use a writing outline with delineated areas that meet the proficient level

of the writing rubric in all subject areas – use a spell check to self correct written assignments – use a calculator to increase accuracy and speed with calculations – attend the after school program to complete homework assignments

where explanation and clarification is available

Page 21: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

21

FYI -Code Mandated Components of Reports

1. Dated and signed;

2. An appraisal of the student's current functioning and an analysis of instructional implication(s) appropriate to the professional discipline of the evaluator;

3. A statement regarding relevant behavior of the student, either reported or observed and the relationship of that behavior to the student's academic functioning;

4. If an assessment is not conducted under standard conditions, the extent to which it varied from standard conditions.

* Note - District also mandates use of discipline face sheet and summary.

Page 22: 1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.

22

This presentation covered writing summaries for discipline assessments and reports that will be:

1. User-friendly for stakeholders who need to understand and utilize reports in school and at home (e.g., teachers, administrators, CST colleagues, and parents);

2. Aligned with participation and progress in the general education curriculum and program; and

3. Utilized by stakeholders in making code-mandated eligibility and IEP decisions.

* Note – Staff experiencing problems writing these summaries can schedule an appointment with the PDC, utilizing a recently evaluated student.