1 Dr. Ronald Dr. Ronald Cooper Cooper Small Business Small Business Administration Administration USA USA
Mar 27, 2015
1
Dr. Ronald CooperDr. Ronald CooperSmall Business AdministrationSmall Business Administration
USAUSA
2
• Small Business Innovation Research Program
(SBIR)
• Small Business Technology Transfer Program
(STTR)
• Member, National Academy of Sciences’, U.S.
Innovation Policy Committee
• Instructor, American University, USA
• Science, Technology, and Economic Policy
Board, National Academy of Sciences
• Publications: Technological Innovation,
Economic Policy, and Economic Development
3
Financing Small Firm Innovation in the United States
Ronald S. Cooper, Ph.DOffice of TechnologyU.S. Small Business Administration
The Small Business InnovationResearch (SBIR) program
and related programs
4
Public innovation programs—U.S.Public innovation programs—U.S.
• “U.S. experience” -- national, state, local-- models, practices, lessons
• Targeting small firms and individual entrepreneurs
-- ¼th R&D $, 55% innovations-- incentive: possibility of high returns-- risk is manageable, failure is an option
5
National policy shiftNational policy shift 1950s, 60s -- Federal role was to support basic
research in Federal labs and large businesses
1970s, 80s -- Policy shift towards: - commercialization of federal R&D - government-industry partnerships - greater role for small business
– “Stevenson-Wydler Act” of 1980
– “University and Small Business Patent Procedure Act” of 1980 (Bayh-Dole Act)
– “Small Business Innovation Development Act” of 1982 established the SBIR program
6
Concern over competitiveness of US industry—productivity
Disconnect between invention and innovation
Economic contextEconomic context
• only 5% inventions in federal labs licensed
• VC industry
• no good “angel” investor networks
• funding gap “valley of death” for early- stage innovation
7
SBIR addresses innovation finance gapSBIR addresses innovation finance gap
Dimensions of the Gap Public program
1. Information Certification effect, outreach
2. Short Timeframe Awards/grants
8Source: MoneyTree Survey—PricewaterhouseCoopers, Thompson Venture Economics, NVCA.
1.4%
62.7%
19.2%
16.7%
Expansion
Early Stage
Late Stage
Start Up
US Venture Capital InvestmentsUS Venture Capital Investmentsby Stage, 2002by Stage, 2002
9
US Venture Capital Investments by Stage
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Source: MoneyTreeSurvey
Later Stage
Expansion
Early Stage
Startup/Seed
10
SBIR addresses innovation finance gapSBIR addresses innovation finance gap
Dimensions of the Gap Public program
1. Information Certification effect, outreach
2. Short Timeframe Awards/grants
3. Size of financing Small grants (< $1m)
11
US Venture Capital Disbursements by size of financing round
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
$16
$18
Source: NVCA and Venture Economics, special tabulations.
Mill
ions
of 1
998
dolla
rs
> $10 million
$1-$10 million
< $1 million
12
SBIR addresses innovation finance gapSBIR addresses innovation finance gap
Dimensions of the Gap Public program
4. Few (fad) technologies Wide range of technologies
5. Geographic specialization Broad geographic coverage
1. Information Certification effect, outreach
2. Short Timeframe Awards/grants
3. Size of financing Small grants (< $1m)
13
Objectives of SBIR program:
Stimulate technological innovation
Use small business to meet federal R&D needs
Increase private-sector commercialization of innovations derived from federal R&D
Small Business Innovation Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) ProgramResearch (SBIR) Program
14
SBIR program todaySBIR program today
• National program providing $2 billion each year to small businesses for innovation
• Over 1,500 firms receive over 5,000 awards each year
• Enables US small businesses to engage in federally-funded R&D—with potential for commercialization
• Enables/encourages federal agencies to utilize the innovation advantages of small firms
15
SBIR’s 3-Phase StructureSBIR’s 3-Phase Structure
PHASE I Feasibility of idea $100,000 (1 year)
PHASE II Full R&D, prototype $750,000 (2 years) Commercialization plan
“PHASE III” Commercialization stage Use of non-SBIR funds
(private capital or federal follow-on)
16
Small business located in the U.S.
500 or fewer employees
Organized for-profit U.S. business
At least 51% owned and controlled by U.S. citizens (individuals)
Principal Investigator’s primary employment must be with the small business
Research partners are allowed/encouraged (up to 1/3 of Phase I, up to 1/2 of Phase II)
SBIR eligibility requirementsSBIR eligibility requirements
17
Federal agencies with “extramural” research budgets of over $100 million per year must reserve a percentage for small business through the SBIR program.
Amount of R&D budget to be set-aside for SBIR:
1982-86 1987-92 1993-94 1995-96 1997-present1997-present
0.2+% 1.25% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5%2.5%
Source of funds for SBIR:
18
U.S. federally-funded R&DU.S. federally-funded R&DTotal: $85 billion in 2002
Small Business 5%
Big Business 27%
Univ. & Colleges 34%
Non-Profit 7%
Extramural 74%
Federal Labs 27%
$62B
19
Program StructureProgram Structure
Each participating Federal agency administers its own SBIR program– Solicitations (with technology topic areas)
– Proposal review & selection (scientific merit / commercial)
– Highly competitive: 16% of proposals accepted - Phase I ½ of Phase I projects win Phase IIs
SBA has oversight and outreach responsibilities
- Policy directive - Monitoring - National conferences
- Evaluation - Outreach programs - Reporting to Congress and activities
20
• Defense (DOD) 600 • Health (HHS,NIH) 487 • Space (NASA) 110 • Energy (DOE) 95 • Science (NSF) 78 • Agriculture (USDA) 17 • Commerce (DOC) 7 • Education (ED) 7 • Environment (EPA) 6 • Transportation (DOT) 6
SBIR participating agenciesSBIR participating agencies
TOTAL ~ $2 BTOTAL ~ $2 BFY 2004FY 2004
(FY2002)
$ millions SBA (oversight)
21
Project selection processProject selection process
Integrity of selection process—key to program success
1. Independent review panel of experts (vol.)
2. 3-5 proposals e-mailed to each reviewer
3. Reviewers grade proposals scientific/technical merit commercialization potential
4. Review panel convenes, ranks proposals (1) Must fund, and (2) award if funds available
5. Agency official makes awards [choice]
Balance between very new ideas and commercial viability
22
Key featuresKey features
Grants & contracts, not loans
truly early-stage, no pay-back, no debt burden
program continues to fund high-risk research
Small business owns intellectual property government must protect IP for 4 years
agency retains royalty-free license for government use only of technical data (IP)
23
SBIR program evolution1982
FederalGovernment
SmallBusinesses
24
SBIR program evolution1982
SmallBusinesses
StateGovernment
Quasi-Government Corporations Economic Development Entities Technology Centers
FederalGovernment
25
State/regional assistance programsState/regional assistance programs
Non-profit org
Matching funds established with state govt funding (1:2)
Firms required to find commercial partners
Firms receive funds in installments only when they pass business milestones:
• Business plan, management structure, marketing strategy, secure private risk capital
Assistance also includes: matching with VCs, angel network, mentor networks, incubators, universities, export assistance
Conditional payback:
• 5% of sales, if successful - 2-3 times original investment
• self-financing after +- 5 years
26
Modified 3-phase structureModified 3-phase structurePHASE I
Feasibility of idea $100,000 (1 year)
PHASE II Full R&D, prototype $750,000 (2 years) Commercialization plan
PHASE III Commercialization stage Use of non-SBIR funds
(private capital or federal follow-on)
“PHASE IIb” (NSF)≈ $400,000 initially
→ $350,000 only with matching invest.
$700,000 cash
$1,450,000$1,450,000
27
Outreach & assistance initiatives
• Outreach to bring in new firms. Is needed:
– to maintain quality of proposals, cutting-edge research
– to improve geographic dispersion (political support)
• Federal support for state-level assistance programs that support innovation success
– Federal & State Technology Partnership (FAST) program
– Rural Outreach Program
– “63% of SBIR projects need assistance with commercialization activities”
28
Federal and State Technology Partnership Federal and State Technology Partnership (FAST) Program(FAST) Program
• Purpose: to provide support to state-level organizations that help small businesses in, or interested in, the SBIR program– Mentoring networks: Business advice & counseling
• Matching grants to state-level organizations– incentive for states with lower levels of SBIR participation
– administered by SBA
• Target: All states eligible, one grant per state
• Funding = FY 2001: $3 million, 30 grants FY 2002: $3 million, 27 grants
FY 2004: $2 million, 10 grants(Grant size: $100K)
29
Rural Outreach ProgramRural Outreach Program
• Purpose: to geographically expand competition for SBIR awards by supporting outreach efforts in states with low levels of program participation.
• Target: 25 rural states
• Matching 5-year grants: one per state, 1:2 (state:federal)
• Funding level: FY 2001: $1.5 million, 25 awards FY 2002: $500K, 10 awards
FY 2004: $250K 5 awards
• Grant sizes: $40K, $52K, $80K
30
SBIR program evolution1982
SmallBusinesses
StateGovernment
Quasi-Government Corporations Economic Development Entities Technology Centers
FederalGovernment
Academia University Research Parks Faculty & Graduate Students Technology Incubators Research Foundations
31
Small Business Technology Transfer Program Small Business Technology Transfer Program (STTR)(STTR)
Promoting Small Business-University CollaborationPromoting Small Business-University Collaboration
• Set-aside program to facilitate cooperative R&D between small businesses and U.S. research institutions
• Established 1992, recently extended through 2009
• Similar structure to SBIR, administered by SBIR offices
• Funding: – Set-aside = 0.3 % of extramural R&D →→ $200 million– Agencies with extramural R&D > $1B must participate
• FY2002: 356 Phase I awards 114 Phase II awards
32
STTR - SBIR DifferencesSTTR - SBIR Differences
• STTR requires research institution partner University or college / non-profit research org. / FFRDC
• Research partner share: min.= 30% max.= 60%
• Award always goes to small business
• Requires written agreement allocating IPRs
• Principal Investigator’s primary employment can be with research institution or small business
33
SBIR program impactsSBIR program impacts
Is often only source of funding available
Enables new startups, spin-offs
Induces entrepreneurial activity (“demonstration effect”)
Enables small firms to develop innovative capacity
Complements private ventures (reduces risk)
“Success rate”: 39% of projects had sales attributable to SBIR (55% had sales or additional investment)
Market value of companies started with SBIR projects (?)
34
LessonsLessons learned learned
• There is an effective role for government in funding early-stage small-firm innovation; grant and payback
• One program cannot do everything: different programs for different stages
• Eligibility: restrict to for-profit small businesses
• Proposal selection: integrity, quality, balance (between very new ideas and commercial feasibility)
• Small firms must own the IP (incentive), public programs must protect it
• Need to design so that it compliments and coordinates with private risk capital (angel, VC, etc.)
35
Lessons learned Lessons learned (cont’d)
• Must have university-specific part of program, or separate (linked) program (like STTR) to deal with IP and promote spin-offs
• Must coordinate with regional/local business assistance programs
• Outreach is needed to maintain program at cutting-edge (new blood)
• Outreach (not quotas) to achieve geographic dispersion--helps create political support
• Program flexibility where possible
36
SBIR & STTR ProgramsSBIR & STTR ProgramsOffice of Technology
U.S. Small Business Administration
For more information• Contact individual agency websites• Cross-agency websites:
www.sba.gov/sbirwww.sbirworld.com
Ronald S. Cooper
(202) 205-6455
37
Dr. Ronald CooperDr. Ronald CooperSmall Business AdministrationSmall Business Administration
USAUSA