Page 1
© Crown copyright Met Office
WMO Lead-centres for verification and archivingRichard Graham (Met Office Hadley Centre) and Won-Tae Yun (KMA) acknowledgements to all GPCs and members of the WMO Expert Team on Extended and Long-range Forecasting (ET-ELRF)
WMO workshop on Sub-seasonal to Seasonal Prediction, Met Office, Exeter, 1-3 December 2010
Page 2
Context
• Forecasters like to compare output from different models, this is helped by:
• easy access to products;
• same map projections, contour conventions etc;
• digital data for ‘user’ processing.
• Multi-model combinations also important
• Verification diagnostics also easier to use if presented uniformly
• Need for international coordination
ECMWF
JMA
2m temperature forecasts for DJF2010/11
Page 3
© Crown copyright Met Office
WMO CBS coordination of centres producing long-range forecasts:Global Producing Centres (GPCs)
First step: agree standard forecast and verification output:
• Designate GPCs: centres adhering to agreed procedures/standards in LRF – there are now 12 GPCs, forming an integral part of the WMO GDPFS
Next step: increase coordination
• 2 Lead Centres, facilitating user access to GPC products
• Lead Centre for Long-range Forecast Multi-model Ensembles (LC-LRFMME)
• Lead Centre for the Standard Verification System for Long-range Forecasts (LC-SVSLRF)
• Aim: improve access and usability of global LRF products to aid production of regional/national climate services
Page 4
© Crown copyright Met Office
GPC designation criteria
• have fixed production cycles and time of issuance;
• provide an agreed minimum set of long-range forecast products,
• 2m temp, precipitation, SST (averages of at least 1-month);
• any lead-time between 0 and 4 months.
• provide an agreed set of forecast quality measures (WMO Standard Verification System for LRF);
• provide up-to-date information on forecast methodology used;
• make products accessible to users (through website and Lead Centres)
Page 5
GPC name Centre System Configuration (ensemble size of forecast)
Resolution (atmosphere)
Hindcast period used
Beijing Beijing Climate Centre Coupled (48) T63/L16 1983-2004
CPTEC Centre for Weather Forecasts and Climate Studies
2-tier (15) T62/L28 1979-2001
ECMWF European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts
Coupled (41) T159/L62 1981-2005
Exeter Met Office Hadley Centre
Coupled (42) 1.25°x1.85°/L38 1989-2002
Melbourne Australian Bureau of Meteorology
Coupled (30) T47/L17 1980-2006
Montreal Meteorological Service of Canada
2-tier (40) T32/T63/T95/2.0°x2.0° (4- model combination)
1969-2004
Seoul Korean Meteorological Agency
2-tier (20) T106/L21 1979-2007
Tokyo Japan Meteorological Agency
Coupled (51) T95/L40 1979-2008
Toulouse Météo-France Coupled (41) T63/L91 1979-2007
Washington National Centres for Environmental Prediction
Coupled (40) T62/L64 1981-2004
Moscow Hydromet Centre of Russia
2-tier (10) 1.1°x1.4°/L28 1979-2003
Pretoria South African Weather Service
2-tier (6) T42/L19 1983-2001
The 12 WMO-designated GPCs
Page 6
© Crown copyright Met Office
WMO Lead Centre for LRF Multi-model Ensembles (LC-LRFMME)
http://www.wmolc.org/
Jointly operated byKorean Met Agency & NOAA NCEPWon-Tae Yun, Arun Kumar
• collect LRF data from GPCs
• core data: monthly pre-calculated anomalies (EM + members) active
• additional data: hindcast and forecast started but not active
• display GPC forecasts in standard formats (next 3-months only at present)
• generate and display an agreed set of MME products
• distribute GPC data (for those GPCs that allow it)
• promote research into MME techniques
Primary functions:
Page 7
GPC forecasts for DJF 2010/11: ensemble mean pmsl anomaly (from LC-LRFMME web)
Exeter ECMWF Toulouse
Beijing
Washington
TokyoMelbourne
Seoul Montreal
Coupled systems
Un-coupled systems
Pretoria
‘Dynamic’ user-selectable domain
Page 8
Multi-model GPC pmsl forecasts, DJF 2010/11from LC-LRFMME website
Ensemble mean of 10 GPCs
Ensemble mean of 7 GPCs (coupled systems)
Ensemble mean of 3 GPCs (un-coupled systems)
multi-model subsets produced interactively from LC-LRFMME website
Presented at South East Europe Regional Climate Outlook Forum (SEECOF), 22-26 November 2010
Page 9
What about last year?pmsl anomalies: observed & GPC predictions from Nov09 for DJF2009/10
anomaly sign ‘consistency’Observed pmsl anomalies (wrt 61-90)
10-model multi-model EM
Page 10
Other products/activities
Other variables:
• Nino3.4 region plumes
• 2m temperature; precipitation; 850 hPa temperature; 500hPa height; SST
Methods of multi-model combining:
• Operational: simple equal weights
• Research: skill weighted combination; linear and non-linear methods
Sub-seasonal:
• 1-month means available in addition to 3-month means
Note: ET-ELRF: last meeting recommended pilot projects on potential for monthly-range prediction for (e.g. rains onset)
Page 11
© Crown copyright Met Office
Priority prediction needs Africa: rainfallDFID-Hadley Climate Science Research Partnership
• Poll of 9 African Regional Centres and National Meteorological Services • Highest priority: predictions of the temporal distribution of seasonal rainfall (e.g. onset,
duration, dry spells)• Less clear at what lead-time onset prediction is needed to be useful
0123456789
No
. o
f vo
tes Rank 1
Rank 2
Rank 3
Rank 4
Question: what next beyond standard 3-month means and terciles?
Page 12
Lead Centre for Standard Verification of Long-range forecasts (LC-SVSLRF)
• repository of global SVSLRF scores for GPC forecasts
• Core of SVS: ROC maps and diagrams, reliability diagrams, MSSS
• documentation on verification scores (Attachment II-8 of the WMO manual on the GDPFS)
• observation datasets for verification, and code for calculating the SVSLRF scores
http://www.bom.gov.au/wmo/lrfvs/
Jointly operated byBureau of Met. BoM) & Met. Service of Canada (MSC)David Jones, Normand Gagnon
Page 13
Examples of submitted data http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/climate/wmo.cgi
ROC curvesROC score maps
Reliability/sharpness diagrams
Courtesy: David Jones (BoM)
Page 14
Use of Lead Centre products at African Regional Climate Outlook Forums (RCOFs)
Page 15
GPC forecasts for E. Africa ‘short-rains’ SON 2010: ensemble mean rainfall anomaly
Exeter ECMWF Toulouse
Beijing
Washington
TokyoMelbourne
SeoulMoscow Montreal
Coupled systems
Un-coupled systems
Page 16
Sample verification: ROC scores for SON precipitation, 1-month lead
ToulouseWashington TokyoMelbourne
above
below
0.6
Page 17
WMO Lead Centre information and final consensus, SON 2010
Ensemble mean of 10 GPCs
Ensemble mean of 7 GPCs (coupled systems)
Ensemble mean of 3 GPCs (un-coupled systems)
Model consistency
Forecaster judgement
Final consensus
Verification
Page 18
WMO Lead Centres in context of GFCS
Page 19
GPCs: role in the Climate Services Information System (CSIS)
GPCs and their
LCs
Other Centres
Monitoring Centres
obs/research
users
GFCS
CSIS
Page 20
WMO Global Seasonal Climate Updates (GSCUs)
• International consensus on global-scale seasonal monitoring and outlook (will extend the WMO El Niño/La Niña updates);
• Other climate indices (Indian Ocean Dipole, NAO)
• Temperature, precipitation
• Intended users: RCCs, RCOFs, NMHSs, but also ‘globally acting users’ (e.g. UN, Red Cross);
• Scoping meeting and first meeting of GSCU Task Team took place 12-15 October 2010;
• identified work needed before Pilot Phase can be begin
• requirements of GSCUs on the Lead Centres are feeding into work plans, e.g.:
• probability forecast products, extension of forecast range
• verification of the multi-model products
Page 21
Summary
• WMO CBS (working with CCl) has designated GPCs and associated Lead Centres for multi-modelling and verification - strengthening coordination of LRF
• Forecast and verification products are available to RCCs /NMHSs / RCOFs - active use is being made
• Lead Centres will play a key role in WMO Global Seasonal Climate Updates (monitoring and outlook) – part of GFCS vision.
• Key plans for the WMO Lead Centres (guided by the Expert Team for Extended and Long-range Forecasts) include:
• development of probability forecast products
• extension prediction range (to ~6 months)
• verification of multi-model products
• possible centralisation of the verification process
• Issue of length of hindcast – but also of consistency of choice of the hindcast period across the GPCs
Page 22
Thank you! Any questions?